Readers' Comments
68 results
Sandeecbell
5 years ago
Our pets are as healthy as we allow them to be. Regular exercise, good nutritious food, veterinary care, and lots of love. That's what makes a pet healthy, not where you live.
Michelle R.
5 years ago
I would chose MIchigan over California any day. Michigan at least has fresh air and wilderness. Besides Detroit and Flint, I think Michigan IS a good home for people and pets.
Michelle R.
5 years ago
You know, just because I'm super close to Detroit doesn't mean my pets aren't healthy. I can believe Denver, but California? The Land of the Smog? I can't believe it.
Lambrhondal
5 years ago
THERE ARE NO EASTERN OR SOUTHERN CITIES LISTED IN THE TOP 5. WHAT DOES THAT SAY ABOUT US?
Shirley B.
5 years ago
Denver has too much snow for arthritic pets and senior owners. My beagle, Sandy, and I moved to Virginia to escape snow and frigid temperatures. We both feel much better. Although Sandy is 12+, she still runs around like a puppy on her good days.
Margaret S.
5 years ago
I too wish the stories stayed up longer. But, we still can see the list of what were considered the top 5 healthiest cities for pets. Too bad my city is not on the list.
Michele Z.
5 years ago
There are serious validity questions about all types of ranking like this. The criteria used are questionable and debatable. For example, I just laughed when Pittsburgh received the "Most Livable City" rating several years ago. If you change the criteria, you will change the rankings.
Top Stories
by Dr. Patrick Mahaney Have you ever lost track of your pet’s location? It’s always a scary situation to suddenly realize your canine or feline … more ›
Advertisement
Advertisement




