
April 22, 2008
BUCHAREST, Romania –- The question of whether wild animals should be kept in private homes, a hot button issue in the United States, is at the center of a case in Romania, where a man was charged with housing a three-year-old lioness in his rear garden.
Rompres state news agency says police found the lioness caged on the man’s property after neighbors called police to complain about the roaring. On the premises police also found two deer, a stag and two peacocks roaming the garden, according to the report. The residence is in the southern village of Pietrosita.
The 28-year-old man is charged with illegal possession of wild animals and could face up to a year in jail, the report says.
Restrictions are limited in the U.S. on purchases of large exotic cats, like lions and tigers. Laws concerning the ownership of such animals vary by state. Experts estimate that between 10,000 and 15,000 tigers in the U.S. are kept as pets or live in private facilities. In contrast, conservationists estimate that fewer than 5,000 tigers live in the wild -- worldwide.
A representative at New York City’s Romanian Cultural Institute told Pet Pulse that only recently did Romania implement laws prohibiting the housing of wild animals on private property.
“Many people in larger cities used to keep animals in their backyards,” the rep said. “Like roosters, or hens or pigs.”
Private ownership of such animals requires special approval, according to Romania’s Deputy Consul General, Andreea Berechet.
“I can tell you that the Romanian law on the protection of animals stipulates that in order to hold a wild animal, you need the approval of the (Romanian National Sanitary Veterinary and Food Safety Authority),” Berechet told Pet Pulse.
Attorney Augustin Zabraupanu, who practices in Bucharest, the Romanian capital, told zootoo.com that private ownership of such large cats is unusual in Romania.
“There are only a few people who have lions, tigers, etc.,” he said.
Tell us what you think about “Roaring Strips Romanian Man of Pet Lion ” below. Share your favorite videos by clicking on the ZootooTV tab. Send us your story ideas by e-mailing us at news@zootoo.com or by calling us at 877-777-4204.
Comments
Page 1 of 2
Next5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
Anyway - that is cruel to keep a large lion just caged in a yard.
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
I'm simply flabbergasted. How on earth can so many of them have been secured (legally or illegally) in private homes? Completely insane.
5 months ago
Reply
People should not be allowed to keep lions, tigers, bears or any other wild animal in their home.
no no no
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
a cage of someone , but should be in their own habitat or zoo areas. Would love to
see it against the law everywhere for people to own such animals.
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
The wild in Asia is non-existant, unless men have put fences and armed guards around it. Most animals in China and India have such small areas to roam that they are now inbreeding themselves toward extinction.
This is an attitude that once had merit, but is now no longer realistic. With tigers on the cusp of extinction, it is truly folly to think they should only live in the wild. Especially if you have ever met a tiger on a cared for basis. Properly cared for animals are happy, content, and live long lives.
Even the wild animals develop a relationship with humans that live near them. It is often the humans that won't tolerate the animals, poisoning, trapping, and carving up every inch of terrain to put up houses with swimming pools, which if an animal dares to drink from, can be and often is shot.
Best, Eric
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
I guess also that we need to realize that as our population grows and people live longer, these wild animals have less and less space that we can call wild. I don't think the solution is to have these wild animals in our homes or yards. We need to think about ways to conserve the wilderness and also protect the environment in ways so that what little wilderness we have remains that way.
5 months ago
Reply
The wild encroachment issue is true for many species, especially those that are thought to be dangerous. Grizzlies can no longer be found in California, except on the state flag. Wolves had to be re-introduced in Wyoming, but are now being hunted again as I type.
No, the time has come to find avenues for them to be cared for properly, and many nations realize this. Kruger NP in South Africa is fenced, and the people need to stay in the cages. In most countries this is not an acceptable idea, so the animals are slaughtered, the food and water they have access to is polluted or removed, and they really have no chance at all.
People that care need to step up and give them homes that are safe. Whether it is room service (Cages) or massive areas where they can continue to live in an uncivilized state, the time is gone to argue.
Proactive actions are not eliminating habitats, but improving the habitats and avenues for those habitats to exist.
A lion roaring is a wonderful sound, but no, I would not appreciate it every night either. Sadly, my kind (Human) of intolerance is prevalant in this world.
Best, Eric
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
This article says the laws recently changed. Perhaps he owned the cat before the law was passed, and now the cat will pay the price. The owner that cared and fed him will be prosecuted, the cat will be taken away and either placed in a Romanian zoo for spectators to torment, or be executed.
Why? It made too much noise for the neighbors to tolerate.
Many people here seem to have the same intolerance, and it is killing many species.
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply