Piping Plover v. Feral Feline Debate Hits Long Island
April 14, 2008
SECAUCUS, N.J. -- In the Long Island community of Brookhaven, a pair of endangered piping plovers nests on Cedar Beach. The migratory birds recently returned to their annual nesting grounds, exacerbating an issue that has surfaced up and down the eastern seaboard for years.
The Cedar Beach plovers have not successfully fledged (raised) a chick in seven years – a fact some say is because of a feral cat colony in the area.
The major proponent of this argument is the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, which wants the felines removed, and has threatened to levy fines against the city of Brookhaven totaling $15,000 a day until the birds are safe again.
Some 30 cats -- many believed to have been dumped by irresponsible owners -- now face being removed from the area by trappers, which will cost the city $10,000. Trapping will begin in less than two weeks, once a referendum on the issue is voted on.
Joan Phillips, vice president of the Animal Alliance of Long Island, wants to negotiate a compromise that will prevent new cats from getting dumped once the existing colony is removed.
“We offered to help find solutions to get the cats out, if (they) set up cameras to catch people that dump their animals,” said Phillips, an avid animal advocate.
But Phillips said the city has chosen another route. Instead, they've given feral cat advocates two weeks to remove as many of the animals as possible before the trapper is sent in.
The plan is to remove the felines, which are invasive predators, to a nearby colony that is cared for by residents. Those that have not been through a Trap, Neuter, Return program may undergo neutering and vaccination before being released among the existing cats.
The established colony of cats has been cared for by residents for about a decade.
Currently, they live very near the plovers' nesting site, which is close to the water and not very well hidden –- the birds are an especially open target for predation, humans walking and beach maintenance machinery.
While there's no proof of a Cedar Beach cat having predated a plover, ornithologists say it's naïve to say cats are not partly responsible for the birds' situation.
“I think there’s a lot of reasons to believe cats are important predators,” said Amanda Rodewald, associate professor of wildlife ecology at Ohio State University's School of Environmental and Natural Resources.
She cited felines’ habit of killing birds for sport, let alone hunger. So even if they’re well fed, they’ll kill birds and rodents for fun. And when prey, like plovers, live on the ground, Rodewald said it is likely that the cats are a serious threat to the birds’ existence.
Because the birds are at such a high risk of extinction – plovers have been on the endangered species list since 1986 – they do need protection.
“I don't think we have a choice,” said Dr. Peter Marra, a scientist at the Smithsonian Migratory Bird Center with The National Zoo. “These cats should not be in the environment.”
Marra said a study he's working on found birds nesting near feral cat colonies are typically successful in raising their young.
In fact, he said the survival rate among young birds from nests near felines' habitats and those that were not were about the same.
But once young birds living near cats leave the nest, their mortality rates increase dramatically, which Marra said is due to feline predation.
In cases like Brookhaven's when an endangered animal lives so close, Marra asked, “Why should a feral cat population be allowed to exist.”
And since cats are not near extinction, protecting their habitat is low on the priority list. Marra said that if cats were native, he would not advocate so strongly their removal.
Yet he feels the birds “need our protection,” he said.
Both Marra and Phillips agree on that point, and the city plans to do just that -- remove the animals.
But there's another point of contention -- Marra and Phillips said preventing the feral cat colony from redeveloping is paramount to resolving the dilemma.
Brookhaven officials, however, have not yet developed a plan to stop cats from returning to the area.
One solution, said Phillips, would cost the city a small percentage of what's being paid to the trapper and would allow feral cat advocates to humanely trap and relocate the felines.
Her idea is for the city to spend $2,000 to $4,000 on surveillance equipment, followed by steady prosecution of cat dumpers.
“What's the point of spending $10,000 to trap the cats when the next day someone could come dump more,” said Phillips. “One person was seen dumping 41 cats. We need a guarantee that something will be done to prevent this from happening again.”
Phillips’ solution is backed by state laws, where in New York, animal dumping and abandonment are illegal and carry misdemeanor charges; she said making an example of one offender through a surveillance system would do a lot to deter dumping in the future.
An act, she contends, would do more to ensure the plovers' future than the city's current plan.
“(The city) did not sit down with the right people to plan this,” said Phillips, who also said other supporters offered to trap the cats at no cost.
The group was also even willing to relocate the felines if a surveillance system was considered.
The matter is now in the hands of a committee, which include members of the Audobon Society, FWS, the Nature Conservancy, Brookhaven legislatures, a veterinarian and Animal Alliance -- the only feral cat representative.
To date, Animal Alliance has not had much luck convincing the group that their surveillance plan is the most suitable option.
With a solution still in debate, the cats are caught in the quagmire. A decision is expected the week of April 21.
For more information, contact the Animal Alliance of Long Island at animalallianceli.org, the Eastern Long Island Audobon Society at easternlongislandaudubon.homestead.com or the Nature Conservancy at nature.org.
Tell us what you think about “Piping Plover v. Feral Feline Debate Hits Long Island” below. You can share your favorite videos by clicking on the ZootooTV tab. You can send us your story ideas by e-mailing us at news@zootoo.com or by calling us at 877-777-4204.
Latest and greatest Comments
Most Recent Pet Pulse Videos
Other news of the day
Domino Effect Leaves Horses Starving Across Nation
TALLAHASSEE, Fla. -- The economy is ...
News archive
Experts: Sea Lions Died from Heat, Not Gunshots
PORTLAND, Ore. -- The deaths of six ...
Dogs, Owners Walk To Fight Cancer – For Both
NEW YORK CITY –- It's only fitting...
DMX Arrested on Drug, Animal Cruelty Charges
SECAUCUS, N.J. -- Phoenix authoriti...
Ohio State Offers Program to Ease Vet Shortage
SECAUCUS, N.J. -- Among the shortag...
Heroic Kitten Rescue Takes Tragic Twist
JERSEY CITY, N.J. –- Despite windi...






Page 1 of 2
Next1 week ago
Reply
1 week ago
Reply
1 week ago
Reply
1 week ago
Reply
2 weeks ago
Reply
2 weeks ago
Reply
2 weeks ago
Reply
2 weeks ago
Reply
3 weeks ago
Reply
What about the ass who was spotted dumping 41 cats? If they know how many why do they not know a license number or description?
It's time the people who cause all of this crap pay for it. Seems like fines - I mean real fines and not a slap on the wrist - woud be a way for some cities to pad their coffers and finally deal with something instead of ignoring it until it gets out of hand.
3 weeks ago
Reply
3 weeks ago
Reply
3 weeks ago
Reply
3 weeks ago
Reply
3 weeks ago
Reply
3 weeks ago
Reply
3 weeks ago
Reply
3 weeks ago
Reply
3 weeks ago
Reply
3 weeks ago
Reply
3 weeks ago
Reply
4 weeks ago
Reply
4 weeks ago
Reply
4 weeks ago
Reply
4 weeks ago
Reply
According to the article the plovers have not successfully raised a chick in seven years. While the feral population may or may not have something to do with that fact, there has to be many other factors going on here. The poor birds are exposed to everything! To predators, to humans and beach maintenance machinery?
Let the animal welfare folks relocate the cats to the nearby successful colony and, of course, they will make sure that those who aren't will be spayed/neutered and vaccinated. All well and good for these particular cats, but the dumping issue must be addressed. Spend a few thousand bucks on surveillance, catch some ass illegally and immorally "dumping" cats, and make sure they are at the very least fined heavily. What the hell is the problem? Sometimes government is so damned stupid it scares a person!
4 weeks ago
Reply
4 weeks ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
It really is all about the young fledglings,for they are the ones who are dying after they leave their parents nesting area. Do you take them away as eggs , & hand raise them until their capable of surviving,and then release? Or do you take them from the parents right before the parents are ready to boot them out of the nest? Will they deal with that trauma okay? Will they too(like the geese some years back) have to be trained to migrate because the humans got involved,or will they "just know"?
Should you do away with the all the feral cats, or the Opossums,dogs,foxes,Raccoons,Birds of Prey and any other animals that may inflict harm on these birds?(And let's not forget the humans in all of this)
Can you keep tearing out natural habitats , and building more and more houses and business developmentsand then be outraged when it affects our Wildlife?
Can you continue to "Promote your states"and their beaches for the perfect place for those summer vacations , just so that your town,city,state has those big Profit numbers?Or should you just start locking the beaches down from late March through September, along with any properties owned by Residents ,keeping both Tourists and locals from enjoying what they deserve to enjoy,because they either own that back yard or they pay their taxes?
The more I think about this,the more my head hurts. I don't want any animal to become extinct,but where do we draw the lines??
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
Need first to help to this cats.
Cats are more close to the people. And cats are more important to the people.
People need respect lifes of another around and need respect Nature.
People too like to eat meat and eggs of the chicken,turkye and another birds.
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
And people can not to be econom on theirs souls.
How need only humane treatment with lifes of another.
Cats are more close to the people then birds.
Cats are so clever and they so love people.
I understand this scientists-it is their job to study birds.
But need to respect all alive around and Nature.
And need everywhere to begin spay/neuter programs.This is the best way and no problem in the future.And it is will be cost more, more little .
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
Second - 10 grand to trap about 30 cats? Are you kidding me? That town is getting ripped off by that trapper – seriously!!!
I feel for the birds as well since they are endangered. But the article even states that there is no proof that the cats are predators to these birds – and that humans walking the beach and the beach maintenance machinery are the birds predators.
Plus other studies need to be done regarding why there is a decline in these birds. There has been proven for instance that the decline of horseshoe crabs have a direct impact on the decline of Red Knots (shore birds). The culprit – HUMANS. Humans killed horseshoe crabs - and their eggs which the shorebirds ate – were just not there since there were no horseshoe crabs. So maybe the wildlife folks should look at all factors before trying to blame some cats.
PS - It was a doc on PBS - it was amazing - "Crash: A Tale of Two Species." Check it out!
Plus - the problem in this case (just like the one I mentioned above) is again - HUMANS. They dump the cats and create the problem. That is your problem people - start there!
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
Also, if this state doesn't have laws that require cats that are allowed to roam to be spayed or neutered, it should fine these owners whose cats are picked up by the shelters that aren't neutered. I think the responsibility lies with the owners of the cats. There are many good cat owners who care for their cats, and then you've got those that create these feral populations in the first place.
1 month ago
Reply
I'm wondering why there are so many cats and who is feeding them? This perpetuating the problem as the dumping is probably happening because people know that someone is taking care of the cats.
Because the birds are endangered, they have to be protected even if it means innocent cats that have been dumped by their owners have to be euthanised.
1 month ago
Reply
Placing a pet out into the wild only makes them more vulnerable to danger.
1 month ago
Reply
Page 1 of 2
Next