January 25, 2008
HAMILTON, Tx. - An undercover investigation by People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals revealed that a Petsmart vendor routinely abuses the animals it raises.
A PETA investigator gained access to the Rainbow World Exotics facility in Hamilton, Texas, which breeds birds and other small animals that are sold in Petsmart stores. Over the course of two months, the investigator documented, filmed and photographed the way animals are treated.
Petsmart does not sell dogs and cats.
PETA is asking customers to boycott Petsmart pending a full investigation by the Department of Agriculture. The animal rights group has filed paperwork in hopes of obtaining such an investigation.
The investigator witnessed a rabbit getting neutered. As can be seen in the video, the animal wasn't properly anesthitized and the blade used was reportedly dull. To clean the animal, Clorox lemon scented wipes were used.
Dead animals were routinely found throughout the facility. Animals eating other animals, cramped cages, and lack of medical care were also common.
Petsmart contends the vendor has passed all previous inspections, and will stand by the company. Information found on the Petsmart Web site stated the company is taking the situation seriously and will fully investigate PETA's allegations.
Petsmart says it requires all its vendors to follow USDA regulations concerning animal care, including having a licensed veterinary professional on site.
Petsmart made headlines last month when it pulled all its birds from 785 U.S. locations because of an outbreak of psittacosis – also known as parrot fever.
To learn more about PETA's investigation, go topetsmartcruelty.com There is graphic imagery. For Petsmart's response, go topetsmart.com and click “Press Room,” then “The Facts.”
Tell us what you think under this story. Post your favorite pet videos at the zootooTV tab. E-mail us your story ideas at news@zootoo.com or call us at 877-777-4204.
Comments
Page 1 of 17
Next1 month ago
Reply
This is the same ALF that PETA co-founder and President Ingrid Newkirk wrote about approvingly in her book Free the Animals! The Untold Story of the U.S. Animal Liberation Front and Its Founder, ‘Valerie’. According toAmazon.com, Newkirk "is one of the few people with firsthand knowledge of the ALF and is personally acquainted with the organization's founder." Furthermore, Newkirk:
…gives interviews to ALF’s publications, supports the legal defense efforts of ALF criminals (with PETA’s money), has been subpoenaed in regard to her ALF connections, and has even been accused in court documents of participation in the ALF arson of a Michigan State University research lab.
I think it’s safe to say that Newkirk would have approved of this recent terrorist attack on a scientist’s home. Newkirk is so strongly opposed to animal research that she has said:
even if animal research resulted in a cure for AIDS, "we'd be against it"
So she’s uncompromisingly opposed to animal testing. Well, as it turns out, not so much. Not when she needs modern medicine, at any rate. You see, recently she broke her wrist:
Just as I was setting out to launch my new book, Let’s Have a Dog Party!, I met a wet floor and went splat, neatly snapping the bones in my wrist. Ooh, the pain! Thank goodness for IV drips.
Thank goodness for IV drips. IV drips. That would be those same intravenous anaesthetics that were tested on rats, rabbits, dogs, cats and monkeys. Apparently she’s not opposed to that animal testing. So unopposed that she thanks "goodness" for it.
Now, you may say, Newkirk didn’t have a choice in this matter, or that Newkirk believes animal testing was unnecessary to develop these medications and procedures. Well, if you think that, I’ll just refer you to PETA’s Animal Testing page, that unambiguously states:
Send back items that you have from companies that test on animals...
From the comments to the PETA blog, I think we can assume that Newkirk is now aware that her painkillers were, in fact, tested on animals. So can we assume that she will now refuse (“send back”) any more painkillers? Or will she, like PETA Vice President and insulin (tested on dogs, rabbits and mice) dependent diabetic Mary Beth Sweetland, continue to enjoy the benefits of animal testing while supporting terrorist acts on the scientists who provide them?
I think we should be told.
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
6 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
6 months ago
Reply
6 months ago
Reply
6 months ago
Reply
6 months ago
Reply
6 months ago
Reply
6 months ago
Reply
6 months ago
Reply
6 months ago
Reply
6 months ago
Reply
6 months ago
Reply
6 months ago
Reply
6 months ago
Reply
Page 1 of 17
Next