OC Shelter Works Toward No Kill Status


LAGUNA HILLS, Calif. -- A grassroots effort spreading across the country by way of animal caregivers demands changes to save animals. One shelter in the richest county in California has joined in the push to save and rehome 100 percent of the animals that .

More than 5,000 residents are part of the South County Animal Shelter Coalition (SCASC), which is pressuring its local city and county governments for an alternative to the existing Orange County shelter.

The current shelter run by Orange County Animal Care Services was built in 1941 to service the 200,000 residents who lived in the county at the time. Today, it serves more than 2.1 million residents, and admits 39,000 animals a year. It’s an “open shelter”, meaning, it accepts any and all animals. But SCASC founder Jean Bland said she and her members are reluctant to bring any stray or lost animals to the facility.

“The kill rate is so high… you’d rather take care of it yourself than take it to the shelter and having it killed because there’s a 50-50 chance it might not make it,” Bland said.

The kill rate at the county shelter is 46%. That’s why Bland herself has turned her Laguna Hills home into a haven for 21 animals that were lost or strayed: three dogs, four cats, two wild ducks, two owned ducks, three love birds, a mini macaw, an iguana and a horse. As generous as that may be, she and other coalition members don’t believe individual homeowners should have to turn their homes into shelters to save animals’ lives.

“We’re asking that no healthy, adoptable animals be killed for lack of space. If an animal is truly on its last leg and the only kind thing to do is euthanize them gently, that’s one thing. Or if it’s at risk because it’s aggressive and can’t be trained, then we understand,” Bland said.

Orange County Animal Care Services is located in the city of Orange. Bland said it’s an inconvenient location for residents who live in the south part of the county, like her coalition members do.

The group has lobbied city governments in Laguna Hills, Rancho San Margarita, Lake Forest and Alisa Viejo to combine resources and build a second shelter, or find an alternative to the county to service their cities, including contracting with city-based shelters in the south county including Mission Viejo, Irvine and Coastal (Dana Point and San Clemente).

City and elected officials have been reluctant to spend money on an alternative. It’s a decision coalition member Amber Woodcock who represents Rancho San Margarita, doesn’t understand.

“I think it’s falling on our officials’ heads. They’re not pushing for it the way our community is asking. Our residents need to step up and be more proactive and convince them this is needed in our community,” Woodcock said.

Bland said the group’s next step is voting officials out of office who don’t support their efforts. Coalition members said they’re also willing to work with the current county shelter management to change its philosophy and practices to transform the shelter into a no-kill one. So far, current shelter management has not taken them up on that offer.

Tell us what you think about “OC Shelter Works Toward No Kill Status” below. You can share your favorite videos by clicking on the ZootooTV tab. You can send us your story ideas by e-mailing us at news@zootoo.com or by calling us at 877-777-4204.

Bookmark & Share: Newsvine Newsvine  Digg Digg  Del.icio.us Del.icio.us  Reddit Reddit


Tags


How do you like this article?

100%, 11 out of 11 users thumbed up.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down

Discuss this topic

Comments



157 comments found.
 
JBland
JBland
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I am a member of the South County Animal Shelter Coalition and although we wish the OC Shelter would work toward at least a substantially lower kill rate they are not currently working toward anything like a No Kill Status. They only recently got a hot water heater so that the animals could get warm baths and this need had to be pointed out to them by an Orange County Supervisor. Members of our group are continuing to work hard with the Orange County Supervisors to substantially improve this shelter and get another one built to take some of the stress of serving 2 million people in about a 1000 sq. miles of of this one shelter.
Jean Bland
 
Claudia
Claudia (HSSAZ)
3 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Good that the group is taking initiative.
 
paula s.
paula s. (paula0092)
3 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
hows this idea.. personally i am for NO KILL for the adoptable!!!.. I THINK IF ALL COUNTY/STATE RUN SHELTERS HAD A ON SITE BEHAVORILIST AND TRAINER..or there had to be at least that in each one! TO HELP EMPLOYEES / VOLENTEERS.. EACH DOG WOULD GET THE CARE THEY NEED,, no more selling pups no more puppy mills NO pet stores just the shelters.. state funded.. federal what ever ..you would have to get your pet thru the state like a adoption agency..!! i know this a crazy idea ,, but its just that my idea.. so no more selling a life to the highest bidder or disposing of one that is un wanted ..lets treat a life with the same respect we give the ever in charge human one .. lets recognize that though different .. a pets life is just as valuable!! as a human one!!!
 
samsamjr2
samsamjr2
3 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
no-kill is the way to go.
 
Janet V.
Janet V. (janeyv)
3 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I'm glad. All shelters should work toward no-kill options except for illness or untreatable injuries. More people are needed to help out in their areas for educating and volunteer work. Maybe schools and churches could lend helping hands. Just a thought.
 
kelly D.
kelly D. (kelly13603)
3 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
education...is the way.... i'm for no kill....but you have to educate people about the numbers being killed or turned away.
 
Christina
Christina (chobbs)
3 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I agree with VetGirl below. I don't believe that a shelter should be completely "no kill", especially when aggression or illness is concerned. I adopted my dog from a "no kill" shelter that was also an open shelter AND contracted with the local area to take in all strays. Unfortunately, the local area was downtrodden and drug-ridden and contained many aggressive strays. There were dogs that were literally frothing at the mouth in their stacked cages and they would never be adoptable. The shelter did not have the resources to socialize and rehabilitate these animals. That means they would be destined to live the rest of thier lives in their small stacked cages. I believe that is terribly inhumane to the animal. However, I STRONGLY believe that an animal that is adoptable or able to be rehabilitated should NEVER be euthanized for space. Although our shelter does not do this, it is a sad reality of the shelter business. I can't tell you how many times I've listened to volunteers at neighboring shelters lament over having to lose adoptable dogs to space issues. It is horrible that we don't have room for all of these loving animals.
 
DrJGardner
DrJGardner
3 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Hi. I agree that "no kill" is an option we will never achieve. Some animals are too old, or too sick, or too aggressive to be saved (just like some people). In California at the Orange County shelter they kill about 50% of the animals. At city based shelters like Irvine and Mission Viejo the rate is less than 10%. So that's a BIG difference. Perhaps "low kill" is a more achievable goal.
 
Carly67
Carly67
3 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
It should be the law to make all shelters no-kill.
 
rose3three
rose3three
3 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
It's not surprising that officials aren't on board with no-kill shelters. The human mentality tends to see animals as disposible items and do not have a problem with putting them down rather than saving them. Folks agree animal abuse should not be tolerated, but do not see that killing them is also abuse. God put these creatures on this planet for a reason and it's up to us to take care of them - that's our job.
 
Sara S.
Sara S. (MochaWheels)
3 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
all shelters should have a no kill policy
 
Angel L.
Angel L. (Etain)
3 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I really hope someday we can stop hearing about kill shelters altogether... according to what I've heard the kill rate at our local shelter is 75%..... I don't know what to do about it other than promote awareness and help but I want to go down there and rescue them all!
 
Come on lets make all shelters no kill! Lets go people!
 
Vetgirl21
Vetgirl21
3 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Shelters shouldn't go completely no kill. Then they would all be full and more people would dump their animals when they cant get rid of them. But a better way would be "selective no kill" you can only "kill" if an animal is severally injured, very sick or contagious, or has done harm that can no longer be changed with behavior modification. But definately something should be done about the hundreds of healthy animals being "killed" every day.
 
kjungb
kjungb
3 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
people are scared of change even if it's the right thing. the shelter should have taken up the offer of help in time no time flat. the easy thing is to do nothing, but obviously SOMETHING needs to be done here. i hope this shelter gets a better location with a no kill status.
 
I wish every shelter could go no kill.
 
parker e.
parker e. (feminist)
3 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
problems can come with no kill. They have to turn away pets cause they have no more room, etc.
 
beaglemutz
beaglemutz
3 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Agreed, it can be easy to call yourself no kill when you can pick and choose or say 'no.' It's a harder road to travel when you can't do those things.
 
beaglemutz
beaglemutz
3 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I think you really have to understand the differences in the way some folks use the words 'no kill.'
 
Carryl D.
Carryl D. (carryld)
3 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Its such a pity that so many great animals can't find homes. Whatever can be done, should be done. Jean Bland is a kind, giving woman to open up her home. Many people open up their homes by fostering, but permanent, loving homes are whats needed.
 
If you can help go to www.socoanimalshelter.org
 
wendy T.
wendy T. (breeze35)
3 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Only in California!!
 
beaglemutz
beaglemutz
3 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I hope not!
 
Jeanne H.
Jeanne H. (JHind)
3 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Working toward no-kill status is a great idea. It takes a lot more than words or declarations to be no-kill because a no-kill status means you need to put the time in with all the animals. But I think this is the right direction.
 
Visit www.socoanimals.org
thank you
 
Bob C.
Bob C. (rjcronk)
3 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 1 user liked it.
Reply
I wonder what the Presidential candidates stand is on animal rights and no-kill shelters. If we had spent all the money we have wasted in Iraq this problem would be non-existent and we would not have wasted over 4,000 American lives...

 
beaglemutz
beaglemutz
3 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
We can't even get our local officials to understand or care....
 
kittypassion
kittypassion
3 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
This should be happening all across the USA. We need to speak out and stand up for what we believe. If the government employees, for which our tax dollars pay for their salaries, do not want to change all shelters into no-kill, then we need to vote them out and get people in the correct departments that will help us make these changes. This should be a grassroot mission.
 
Only in California!!
 
jerZgirl
jerZgirl
3 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Oh, I'm not going to be popular with what I'm about to say...

No-kill shelters are a great concept but a bad idea in reality.

First off, who will determine what is "adoptable"? I firmly believe that not every animal in a shelter can or should get adopted out. Man-biters for one-if a dog bites a human enough to be put in a shelter it should not be adopted out. Period. Put it down. No questions or exceptions in my book. Why wast your time to "train and rehab" a man-biter when GOOD dogs are languishing in the same shelter?

Sick animals are another-how much should the shelter spend to rehab dogs and cats with serious illnesses? I don't know the answer myself. It's all relative.

And it takes comittment from volunteers to make sure the dogs in the no-kill shelter don't go stir crazy after sitting in a run for months...not every facility has that luxury of dedicated volunteers.

While it would be wonderful to see every dog and cat with a home, it will never be a reality. And space is at a premium in most places as it is-why push the limit? Especially with cats-there are so MANY adoptable cats out there and nowhere NEAR enough homes-how long are you willing to keep a cat in a cage?
 
kjungb
kjungb
3 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
i see your points, and i've heard them before. i understand and i don't think that we'll ever have a world where every shelter is a no kill facility. but i think we can move in the right direction and begin changing certain shelters into no kill facilities.

I do have to say that as a volunteer at a no kill shelter we have 14 free roaming rooms with multiple cats in every room. (we have about 140 total right now). The cats that we keep in cages are ones that HATE other cats, incoming cats until all tests are negative for FIV and FeLuk, and sick/watched cats. Not ALL no kill facilities keep their cats locked in cages.
 
beaglemutz
beaglemutz
3 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
How about a world where we don't need as many shelters in the first place...
 
Ok you said it. Now here is what I have to say to that. ready? What Jean and others are doing is to help save lives. The South County Animal Shelter Coalition mission to get a pro humane shelter in South OC. We reconize that some severely sick or aggressive animals will have to be euthanized. In comparrison to other pro humane shelters in the area (not county run) stats show a decrease in int he amount of the animals coming in and a high number of them being adopted. Why you say? well these shelter do everything they can to encourage adoption. They use adoption application and check people out to make sure they are the right fit(county does not) more animals get returned otherwise. Senior programs are in place for older animals so they can be adopted more quickly, Volunteers are in high amounts so no animal goes without attention(more walks than your own dog gets) Besides who wants to work for a shelter where you walk a dog one day and then it is euthanized the next. Over time, the number of animals going into the shelter decrease. The sign that spay and neutering and education to the public is working. How can Orange County help with so many cities to look after? They need more shelters down here and our cities need a prohumane one. It has been to long. I can go on and on here, but the bottom line is that all the leaders of this group are fighting for what is right.
 
Jeanne H.
Jeanne H. (JHind)
3 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 1 user liked it.
Reply
But I think it can be a reality if there are other efforts supported as well. If animals are spayed and neutered, the stray dog and cat population truly can be reduced. It takes time, but it works. Not every dog bite means the dog can't be rehabilitated and again a community effort to work with dogs with behavioral issues can work. A no-kill shelter should have to show that it can handle the animals it takes in so no animal is somehow left in a run for a long time and not socialized. I must be lucky in that I only know a few no-kill shelters and the efforts and volunteer hours put in are extraordinary. We all know that pets become ill and that a responsible pet owner knows when it is time to put an animal down. The issue I have is that putting an animal down because we just don't have time or space is irresponsible. That's why I volunteer; it isn't enough to say we need to do something. If every person who cares for animals contributes either time or money (and it really is the time and love that helps the animals) and if every community works to educate people about pet ownership, bans sales of pets from pet stores and uninspected breeders, and starts working with schools through schools and volunteer service at shelters...I think we'd see a big drop in the problems. It takes time and effort, but I don't think it is hopeless.
 
jerZgirl
jerZgirl
3 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
You must be the lucky ones that don't live where I do. I see it different-its a stark contrast...

And I still stand that a dog bites a human unprovoked enough to warrant medical attention or to have it wind up in the shelter-no matter how cute and fuzzy it may be it gets put down. Even goes for my own dogs. I know too many perfectly adoptable dogs that sit and sit and dont get the attention they need becasue a shelter is trying to rehab a dog that bit. And I'm sorry if this offends you, but this is why the message boards are here-to voice opinons.

In this sue-happy world WHY waste precious funds on a biter???
 
Thank you so much
please visit www.socoanimalshelter.org
 
Carryl D.
Carryl D. (carryld)
3 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
You go girl..you said it in a nut shell.
 
It seems like, in this area, there could be funds made available to make this shelter no-kill. Amongst people I know, there is much unknown about the numbers of animals euthanized every year. I think people are starting to hear more - perhaps that is what this shelter needs - simple publicity to get the community going.
 
Brenda
Brenda (BrendaM)
3 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
More political red tape and lack of support for animal causes...

I hope that they get what they need. It would help a lot!
 
Christine
Christine (kikgirl2)
3 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
That is awesome! More and more people/shelters/rescues need to get with this program!! First and foremost people really need to learn the importance of spaying and neutering their pets, puppies and kittens are so cute and so much fun, but people have to look at the big picture. No-kill is wonderful, but they definately need help, and help starts with being the owner of an animal who isn't fixed.
 
suzzieQ
suzzieQ
3 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I'm sorry but i do not like the idea of a no-kill shelter. This just means, if they can't adopt an animal out in so much time, it goes to an open-shelter, where it still might be put down. No-kill shelters just don't like to put down old, sick, or agressive animals.
 
kjungb
kjungb
3 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
That's not a correct statement. Have you had close experience with a no kill shelter before? I have been at one for the last year and we have 140 cats right now. We have no aggressive cats in the entire shelter. We have had to put down multiple cats that were dying from various diseases. We have had cats at our shelter that have been there for 2 or more years (we opened the doors only 2.5 years ago). We do not give them to other shelters to be put down, that would defeat the purpose of a no kill shelter. We have an additional almost 80 cats that are foster homes that are also adoptable through our shelter.
 
We are fighting to save lives. We understand some severely sick or aggressive animals may need to be euthanized, but it will not be due to lack of space. All animals will have the chance. Just on a side note: Have you ever watched Ceasar Milan the dog whisperer?
 
beaglemutz
beaglemutz
3 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
What's the obsession with Milan? Go visit the American Humane website to read about his negative, intimidation, pain based training.
 
Dusty
Dusty (dvrkennels)
3 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Good luck.
 
I hope that works out. Good luck : )
 
margaret  m.
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
well i wish them all the luck in the world. They are trying to do a really good thing.
 
terrae01
terrae01
3 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I hope their efforts pay off!
 
melissa7271
melissa7271
3 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
It sounds like they are hard at work to get this and hard work does pay off. I wish them the best with the whole process.
 
Serena E.
Serena E. (redpuppy79)
3 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
i hope they make it to there goal, do what ever you can to get the community involved. they will help greatly when it comes to the people in the goverment
 
Kelly
Kelly (Bubbled26)
3 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I wish them lots of luck with this. I hope they are able to get another shelter built as well because it sounds like that would help a lot. More people need to step up and help out! I hope they are able to find a solution.
 
good luck
 
Ashley W.
Ashley W. (awhite1020)
3 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Great story. I hope it works out.
 
Laurie F.
Laurie F. (sallygrace)
3 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Congrats on their efforts, I hope they succeed!!
 
Ty N.
Ty N. (ParamoreFan1)
3 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Oh,I do hope that this works!
 
Lisa
Lisa (Spaceylisa)
3 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
This is great. I do hope it can become a no kill shelter
 
Ellen K.
Ellen K. (EllenK115)
3 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Why is it easier for officials and those to run the shelter to destroy an animal that could be adopted? They are the richest county -- not that that matters -- so put some $$$ towards making a positive environment facility -- adoptions, spay/neuter, education, community outreach programs, etc. The reason I say that it does not matter if they are rich or not -- the poorest of communities can have the biggest of hearts and do a better job with the animals in their care...!
 
Right ON !!!! Thank you
 
DrJGardner
DrJGardner
3 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 1 user liked it.
Reply
Interested people should log on to www.socoanimalshelter.org. Copies of research papers are available from socoasc@yahoo.com
 
gail
gail (adolphe)
3 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Good for this group of people and I wish them the best of luck.
 
great job :)
 
Tabetha W.
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
It is wonderful to see more people taking action for "No Kill Shelters" Best of luck to you!
 
Jaime S.
Jaime S. (4thefur)
3 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I wish I had the money to setup my very own non-kill shelter. I would go shelter to shelter and rescue animals that are near death.
 
Elisha C.
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Good work. It makes me feel so happy when I read stories like this. Every one on a board or committee should feel like every shelter should be a no kill. Why be there if it is not too support the animals.
 
kadiquilts
kadiquilts
3 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
A noble goal.
 
The people need to step up and adopt! I know that shelter, but don't live in California anymore.
 
tanyam
tanyam
3 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
i would love to see a no kill shelter but some people forget that most no kill shelters are that way because they do turn animals away when they are full and i think its unfair to blame shelters for euthing animals to make room for all the new ones that come in half of which are turned in by the owner
 
chili1zz
chili1zz
3 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
what great hope that some day more shelters will not kill
 
Rosemaryh
Rosemaryh
3 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.