
April 15, 2008
SAN CLEMENTE, Calif. -- The term No Kill is common to animal shelter workers and animal advocates nationwide. A No kill shelter is one in which euthanasia is reserved only for the untreatable and untamable animals. Few shelters can claim the title, but author and animal advocate Nathan Winograd believes the country will embrace this methodology within the next decade.
Winograd’s goal: to essentially “create an army of compassion” to change sheltering as Americans know it.
He is the general of this army and his strategy is clearly detailed in his wildly popular new book “Redemption: The Myth of Pet Overpopulation and the No Kill Revolution in America.”
The first-time author published the book in September 2007 and already “Redemption” is in its third printing.
It chronicles Winograd’s career as a No Kill advocate and shows how anyone can transform their shelter, their community into a No Kill facility.
“It’s really a grassroots movement of pet-loving citizens around the country demanding cities to embrace new models of sheltering,” said Winograd, a pet owner who rescued his own companions from shelters.
He has blamed the shelter system for unnecessarily killing healthy, adoptable animals for reasons such as space restrictions.
The notion of “pet overpopulation” in Winograd’s mind is a “myth.” He refers to his research which shows more people are looking to bring dogs and cats into their homes than the number of those put into shelters.
“Right now, in our country, shelters are failing 50 percent of times for dogs in some communities as high as 80 percent for cats,” said Winograd. “The reason is they’re blaming the community for having to kill, but not changing their own behavior that would impact killing.”
Winograd advocates that mobile adoption sites, low cost or free spay and neuter programs and encouraging volunteerism are steps that will combat what he calls “institutional defeatism.”
He helps shelters break through that defeatism by studying their policies and procedures, and recommending changes that will save more animals.
“Not enough shelters are saying ‘what’s wrong?’ Anything we can do to overcome what you see is behavior problem in animals, or inability to afford medical care for animals, or environmental problems like, ‘my landlord doesn’t allow pets,’ ” said Winograd. “If shelters did those things, and did those things comprehensively, and did those things rigorously, we’d be a no kill nation today.”
Through his consultant work, the creation of the No Kill Advocacy Center in Oakland, Calif., and now his book, Winograd continues to preach what he sees as the inevitable reality of a No Kill nation.
“I think we’ll be a no kill nation in five to 10 years, and killing will be seen by the next generation as a cruel aberration of the past,” said Winograd.
Pet Pulse’s coverage of the No Kill Advocate Center and author Nathan Winograd will continue with our series highlighting the No Kill movement.
Tell us what you think about “No Kill Advocate’s Goal: Create an Army of Compassion” below, and be sure to watch the video of this story at the top of your page. Share your favorite videos by clicking on the ZootooTV tab. Send us your story ideas by e-mailing us at news@zootoo.com or by calling us at 877-777-4204.
Comments
Page 1 of 2
Next2 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
Another person sent a pic of 5 puppies to half of that (50) and they were gone and people wanting more in 10 minutes.
Mr. Winograd needs to come to Texas and show the shelters that overpopulation is a myth. I love his ideas but I have to disagree with him.
Also, spaying and neutering is not affordable here and that is a large part of the problem. I just don't think I understand why it has to remain at over 100.00 when the vets don't keep the animals overnight any more.
A no-kill nation would be wonderful.
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
The notion of “pet overpopulation” in Winograd’s mind is a “myth.” He refers to his research which shows more people are looking to bring dogs and cats into their homes than the number of those put into shelters.
I haven’t read the book, but I am on my way to get a copy. I hope he gives directions to the planet he lives on so I can fire up my space ship and bring all the homeless animals from earth to him and all his friends waiting to adopt pets.
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
We need to make this an army of many!
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
Having worked at an animal shelter that had an animal control cotract, I can tell you that part of the problem is the un-checked breeding practices of a lot of backyard breeders and puppy mills. For this Winograd to make the claim that there are "more people looking to bring dogs and cats into their homes than the number of those put into shelters". Of course this statistic takes into account the many, many people looking for pure-bred or "designer" dogs and cats. I once overheard a breeder make the statement that "there are always homes for the puppies" a few months later she was left with a puppy she had been unable to sell (at $1600.00 each!).
While I do applaud Winograd's attempts to eliminate all un-neccessary euthanasia, I fear that the goal of "5-10 years" may be a little overly optimistic. I do believe that education is a huge part of the equation, but I also believe that there need to be stringent laws regarding the breeding of dogs and cats.
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
There are two things that make for a successful no-kill, in my opinion. One is when there is an evaluation process to evaluate all dogs/cats temperments and then screen adopters as well. This ensures a good fit between new pet and owner and makes for a lifelong love that will be less likely to end up back in a shelter.
The second thing that is a must is an aggressive spay/neuter policy. Not just for the shelter pets but for the community. It has to be simple for the community to use and affordable. This is the true secret to success. It makes the most sense - to get to the root of the problem and stop pets from coming into the shelters in the first place. This book has hit on these points.
It concerns me that there are still a lot of communities that do not have any low cost spay/neuter programs to turn too. At our shelter, we have received countless thank you letters from people using our program and they all say virtually the same thing - thank you for helping me to be responsible. I truly feel that people do want to do the responsible thing and if they have that option at their local shelter they will do it. I agree with this author that we can certainly attain no-kill status in this country if we all join together and get to the root of the problem. If we help people to be responsible owners, then hopefully the next generation will also be responsible and they will only hear about euthanasia in books from the past...
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
The myths he speaks about - like landlords not allowing pets - well - welcome to NYC - it is not myth. My shelter (a no-kill by the way) and a lot of other organziations have dedicated their time to combatting this problem - but guess what - landlords have a lot more pull with politicians usually - so it is truly a struggle for many of not most in NYC.
So what he says is a nice thought - and hopefully we can get there one day - but I think this guy needs to step back into reality first.
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
I am glad that since we got the new director, the SPCA that runs our shelter has done more aggressive marketing of available pets, and increased adoptions. We might qualify as a "no-kill" shelter, but I'm not totally sure. My involvement is more in fund raising and public relations as a volunteer.
I think the "No Kill" philosophy is definitely worth all shelters aspiring to, even if they never totally reach it, as long as they are working toward it, it is tremendous progress in the right direction.
I have talked with the shelter director here about the possibility of doing swaps with other shelters. Labradors are a dime a dozen here, and if it could be arranged, maybe we could swap with a shelter in another area where labs would be more desirable, for something "different" to this area.
Perhaps it could even be a regional network, where if someone was looking for something specific, they could check with other shelters and arrange to have the animal transferred in. If junkyards can do it for car parts, and car dealers for new cars, why not do it for the animals? Obviously there would be many details to work out, but it could be done.
5 months ago
Reply
For more info on early spay/neuter go here
http://www.columbusdogconnection.com
If we can not get shelters/rescues to do 100%, how can get get the public.
5 months ago
Reply
I ask because there are some no kills that don't do anything under 6 months and to me that is wrong.
I believe no animal should leave a shelter/rescue until it is altered. No excuse.
So again, how many of your shelters do 100% spay/neuter. If you don't, then we can never move to a no-kill or I like better a low kill shelter nation.
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago
Reply
5 months ago