April 16, 2008
RALEIGH, N.C. – A North Carolina Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals is pushing a county-run animal shelter to make fundamental changes. SPCA officials said their plan will prevent the unnecessary killing of animals.
Although the Wake County shelter disagrees, it is being forced to implement the SPCA’s changes anyway -- and may lose part or all of a proposed $4 million budget as a result.
Mondy Lamb is the marketing director at the SPCA. For years, she said, the animal loving staff there has tried to help local animal control reduce euthanasia, increase adoptions and improve the quality of life for animals’ within its care.
But until recently, the SPCA’s plans were mired by a lack of outside force, and fundamental differences in the groups’ animal care outlook.
“(Wake County Animal Care, Control and Adoption’s) role is to prevent people from getting rabies,” said Lamb, referring to the county shelter’s mission.
According to Michael Williams, director of Wake County Animal Care, Control and Adoption is protecting the community from unhealthy and unsafe animals.
It also provides homeless animal care and adoption services -- although it doesn’t require an adopted animal to be spayed before leaving with its new family -- a major point of contention for the SPCA.
Williams said that at the onset, every government run animal care facility was meant to prevent the spread of rabies. But that role has grown to include stray animal collection, care and adoption.
“We adopt more animals per year than the SPCA, but then again we take more in, too,” said Williams, whose budget is about $500,000 less than the SPCA’s.
Both Lamb and Williams said that for the last decade or so, the SPCA has been working with the county shelter to make improvements. In Williams’ words, “they want us to do things their way.”
But Lamb said her organization’s goal is to improve the well being of the animals in the county’s care -- by reducing the number they take in and have to euthanize through implementing low-cost spay/neuter programs and increasing adoptions.
In the SPCA’s view, preventing animal births today means fewer will need to be put down tomorrow.
Lamb said those techniques have worked at their facility, and if they are adopted into law by the county, they could set an example for the rest of North Carolina’s public and private animal care groups to follow.
The SPCA follows the Maddie’s Fund guidelines -- which promote No Kill through spay/neuter, fostering, rigorous adoptions and an adoption guarantee. Meaning the shelter has committed to get an animal adopted -- and it cannot be put down to make room for another.
While the SPCA is honing its skills for saving animals’ lives, it has worked to share the life saving goal with the community -- and the county shelter.
Measures for transforming the county shelter into one more closely allied with the goals of the SPCA were discussed during a Board of Commissioners work session held on Thursday, March 10. Lamb said her organization had tried to get these changes made through working more privately with the county for years, but to no avail.
So prior to the meeting, the SPCA sent a newsletter to its 60,000 readers asking them to mail letters regarding the county shelter to their local commissioners. After the local representatives’ inboxes were flooded with letters and e-mails, it was decided that the concerns should be heard.
During the session, the SPCA laid out that it wants the county shelter to combat issues in cleanliness, overcrowding, and the use of a gas chamber for putting down animals that pose a health or safety risk to staff.
Also, on the agenda is a devised plan by the county to start sending more animals to the facility beginning July 1 -- which Lamb said the county cannot manage.
Finally, the SPCA believes it can help reduce the county shelter’s need for a larger facility, through preventative spay/neuter and increasing adoption, as well as animal reuniting programs.
The SPCA said their changes amount to reduced taxpayer spending and potentially saving more homeless animals’ lives.
But Williams said his shelter is clean, and that those who made allegations about it being unkempt, “probably hadn’t been inside the shelter for a year or so.”
“We do keep a clean shelter,” he said.
He said staffing needs could be met through increased funding -- specifically, a $4 million package, which could be approved as early as July. At that time, animals will be redirected from shelters in the nearby towns of Garner and Cary to Raleigh’s facility.
Williams believes his shelter can handle the additional animals -- roughly 900 or so each year -- since his facility already takes in more than 5,000.
The decision to redirect the animals came from the SPCA, which for years has held a contract with the county to collect and house homeless animals, but now wants to opt out and focus only on “high-volume” adoptions.
Lamb said the SPCA’s plan would help prepare the county shelter for that transition without the need for the $4 million in taxpayers’ money. She doesn’t think the shelter will be able to reduce its euthanasia numbers through increased funding.
She said the plan was to “hold the shelter’s hand” through the transition.
Williams disagrees with that notion.
“If we were on the same playing field financially, we could make a lot of changes,” he said.
Yet the Board of Commissioners decided to hear out the community’s concerns and will begin the process of implementing them, although no date for making any legal changes has been set.
“We’re going to stop using (the gas chamber),” said Williams. “If that’s what the citizens would like, then we’re happy to do that.”
The device, in recent years, had only been used for around six percent of the shelter’s euthanasia -- and Williams said even then it was for rabid raccoons and other wildlife and overly aggressive dogs. He said it was a way to reduce the risk of injury to shelter staff.
As for that potential $4 million budget, Williams is still pushing for it. The board will reconvene in coming months to make that decision.
Tell us what you think about “NC Shelter Pushed by SPCA to Change” below. You can share your favorite videos by clicking on the ZootooTV tab. You can send us your story ideas by e-mailing us at news@zootoo.com or by calling us at 877-777-4204.
Comments
Page 1 of 2
Next4 days ago
Reply
4 months ago
Reply
4 months ago
Reply
4 months ago
Reply
4 months ago
Reply
4 months ago
Reply
4 months ago
Reply
4 months ago
Reply
4 months ago
Reply
4 months ago
Reply
4 months ago
Reply
4 months ago
Reply
4 months ago
Reply
4 months ago
Reply
4 months ago
Reply
4 months ago
Reply
4 months ago
Reply
4 months ago
Reply
4 months ago
Reply
4 months ago
Reply
4 months ago
Reply
4 months ago
Reply
4 months ago
Reply
4 months ago
Reply
4 months ago
Reply
4 months ago
Reply
4 months ago
Reply
4 months ago
Reply
4 months ago
Reply
What percentage of animals coming into his shelter are deemed unhealthy and unsafe versus what percentage are euthanized versus his $4million budget... His is a shelter in desperate need of a "staff makeover"
4 months ago
Reply
4 months ago
Reply
Arghhh
4 months ago
Reply
4 months ago
Reply
4 months ago
Reply
4 months ago
Reply
4 months ago
Reply
I glad the SPCA wants to help the shelter, open your minds and hearts, work together to save the quality of life for these beautiful creatures. Let's all work together however we can and together we can make a diiference and help reduce the number of adoptable animals being brought into shelters.
4 months ago
Reply
4 months ago
Reply
I think that it is great the SPCA wants to help Wake Co. animal control out. I think that it is just immature for the head of the animal control to get so upset and not be open to getting help from the SPCA. They need to compromise and work together for the betterment of animals. If they don't spay and neuter the animals they adopt out, they are still be adding to the problem. That is why at the shelter I work with we make sure each animal is spayed/neutered before it leaves us. In any case, I hope that they can get over their differences and work for the better good. If this is successful, it could be a great thing for the animals of North Carolina.
4 months ago
Reply
4 months ago
Reply
4 months ago
Reply
4 months ago
Reply
4 months ago
Reply
4 months ago
Reply
Spay and neuter before adoption.
4 months ago
Reply
I am a "No Kill" advocate. I believe that any healthy animal that can be adopted,should have that opportunity.You shouldn't have to die because you came into a shelter wearing the wrong number.
It's awful that our Shelters are so full.It's awful that staff are overwhelmed with their specific job,and probably ten others jobs that they have to help out with.It's awful how much it takes to care for these animals,but that doesn't mean that animals should be done away with because of it.
Our Government contributes to so many causes outside of our country.Some I agree with,most I do not.They need to step up the game some.They need to spend more time taking care of their own because we have so many "Causes" ourselves. I don't mind helping,but I want our country's problems to be top priority.
Public Awareness is a powerful tool.
If more people know that there is a cause,more people will get involved.
The shelters need to continue to promote their need for Volunteers,donations,etc.
It's a HUGE problem,but we have to suck it up and continue to try and help the poor animals who can't speak for themselves.They have rights too.
4 months ago
Reply
4 months ago
Reply
4 months ago
Reply
4 months ago
Reply
Spay and neuter before adoption.
4 months ago
Reply
No Kill Policy:GOOD
Use of A Gas Chamber:That Should be ILLEGAL!!!
4 months ago
Reply
What the shelter really needs right now is funding so they can improve their facility and improve animal care (they need air conditioning! there aren't enough staff or volunteers to walk the dogs once a day), increase adoptions, decrease disease (so animals coming in don't mix with animals being adopted). I hope you will join me in lobbying the County to provide the funding that the shelter desperately needs. Unfortunately, "no kill" is not an option when the shelter takes in 5000 animals every year due to irresponsible owners - it's not the shelter who doesn't care, it's the owners who think it's ok to let their animals roam free and turn them in to the shelter when the pets are "too old" or "too big" or "too much trouble".
4 months ago
Reply
4 months ago
Reply
4 months ago
Reply
4 months ago
Reply
4 months ago
Reply
4 months ago
Reply
4 months ago
Reply
4 months ago
Reply
Page 1 of 2
Next