Minnesota's Plan for Dangerous Dogs
October 25, 2007 |
By Matt Van Hoven
| 367 comments
Tags: dogs, pitbulls, midwest, behavior, crime & law
MINNESOTA – In Minnesota, the City of Apple Valley is taking a new approach to dealing with so called “dangerous dogs.” Rather than banning certain breeds, they're looking into each dog's behavior.
A new ordinance would allow authorities to determine just how dangerous a dog may be – and decide from there how to accommodate them in a way that reduces risk.
Here's how it works.
If a dog has a history of unprovoked attack that causes bodily harm, it's considered “dangerous.”
If a dog commits an unprovoked attack that doesn't result in bodily harm, it's considered “potentially dangerous.”
In either case, such dogs will be micro-chipped, and must wear muzzles when in public. If the dog dies, is sold or is moved, police must be notified within14 days.
But there's a twist. The ordinance proposes that dangerous dogs may only be housed in industrial areas of the city, away from residential neighborhoods.
That part of the law is a point of contention for dog owners, who would likely have to relocate.
Compared to similar measures though, Apple Valley's plan works on a case by case basis – a fact that demonstrates a new breed of thinking on the issue.
What do you think of this plan? Share your opinion below this story. Post your pet videos at the zootooTV tab.
You can email us story ideas at news@zootoo.com or call us at 877-777-4204.
Comments (224)
Top Stories
by Dr. Patrick Mahaney Have you ever lost track of your pet’s location? It’s always a scary situation to suddenly realize your canine or feline … more ›
Advertisement
Advertisement


