Impounded 6 Months, Accused Dog Back Home


Sayreville, N.J. –- After being stripped from his home – twice – a New Jersey dog is back with his owner after being impounded for about six months when labeled potentially dangerous by the borough of Sayreville.

Kuma, a three-year-old mixed breed, was in a scuffle last September, during which he injured another dog and two passersby trying to intervene. Sayreville’s chief Health Department official labeled Kuma potentially dangerous, and ordered him impounded while the case was pending.

A settlement was reached, and Kuma returned home to owner Maria Papacharalambos March 17. When the incident occurred, Kuma was living with Papacharalambos’ stepfather, who was charged in the case. Under the settlement, he pled guilty and paid fines for having his dog off a leash and failing to register him.

Once before, Kuma had been taken from his home while living with Papacharalambos’ stepbrother. When he broke up with his girlfriend, his ex took the dog. Thereafter though, she changed her mind about keeping Kuma, and dropped him off, unannounced, tying him up outside Papacharalambos’ stepdad’s home.

Even the day Papacharalambos finally picked Kuma up from the pound, their adventure wasn’t over. While bringing him home, her vehicle broke down on the highway.

“This poor dog has been through so much,” Papacharalambos said. “I felt terrible. He was shaking from all the commotion with the cars and trucks. And when the tow truck came he didn’t want to get out of the car.

“But we finally got Kuma to a good home.”

Under the settlement, Kuma is not labeled dangerous, but Papacharalambos had to adopt him and take him to live with her in Denville, N.J. The settlement stipulates that Kuma be muzzled whenever he’s outside.

Even had the case gone to trial with Kuma labeled dangerous, the dog could’ve stayed in Sayreville, according to Papacharalambos’ attorney, Gina Calogero.

“So this way the neighbors got the peace of mind of knowing they didn’t have to run into him,” Calogero said.

Pet Pulse first reported on Kuma’s case last year, when Papacharalambos became teary-eyed while visiting him at the pound.

That day, Papacharalambos said, “I just break down in tears because it’s so upsetting to see that he’s just waiting behind those bars. He’s like, ‘Oh, you’re here to come get me and take me home.’

“And I’m not, and I can’t bear to leave him.”

“Even violent criminals are allowed out on bail pending trial,” Calogero said at the time, calling for new legislation to prohibit animals from being impounded while court cases involving them are pending.

“Even if this dog were convicted, the sentence for a potentially dangerous dog is to go back home with his owners, under certain restrictions,” Calogero said.

New Jersey Assemblyman Neil Cohen agrees. Last year he introduced Congo’s Law, which would enable animals to remain free while cases are pending, provided the public’s safety can be ensured. The bill would also place new restrictions on municipalities when sentencing an animal to death.

Cohen’s legislation died in committee, however.

Congo’s Law was named for Congo, a New Jersey dog that was sentenced to death in Princeton Township for biting a landscaper last year. Congo’s owners settled that case out of court, but in the meantime Congo was impounded for months.

“Dogs have already been labeled and imprisoned even before it set its paw into court,” Cohen told Pet Pulse last year.

“There’s fencing,” he added. “You can keep the dog within the house. There are a number of things that can be done without keeping a dog impounded.”

The Kuma case was made more complex, Calogero says, because a Sayreville Health Department official, and not its Animal Control Officer, labeled the dog and had him impounded.

“This case underscores the need for legislative changes,” Calogero said. “Because for one thing, there was great confusion over who had authority to impound the dog, or to bring these charges.

“And my client had to pay for six months of impound fees, when this could have, and should have been resolved a lot earlier.”

Their drama behind them, Kuma and Papacharalambos are now happily reunited.

“He was abandoned once,” she said. “I’m not going to let him be abandoned again.”

Tell us what you think about “Impounded 6 Months, Accused Dog Back Home” below. Share your favorite videos by clicking on the ZootooTV tab. Send us your story ideas by e-mailing us at news@zootoo.com or by calling us at 877-777-4204.

Bookmark & Share: Newsvine Newsvine  Digg Digg  Del.icio.us Del.icio.us  Reddit Reddit


Tags


How do you like this article?

83%, 5 out of 6 users thumbed up.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down

Discuss this topic

Comments



102 comments found.
 
Update on Congo: Congo's owner had him put to sleep (along with their other three dogs), so the world didn't get any better for him or their other pets. It's a shame that pets get the fallout from things that happen in the lives of their people, whether through poor decisions on the personal, business or other fronts.
 
wo
wo
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
i assume no one reads any of the comments from other zootoo people!! if you did you would read webterannes' comment about this dog and maria since she is one of the owners. you will see the dog is now loved very much and taken care of. what is all this fuss due to? is it the two passersby trying to intervenele?. if so that is a choice they made. i realize it was about the other dog being hurt, and that should of been the case. the dog had no other issues against him. nor did the poor dog who bit the landscaper. was he hurt so bad that they had to kill the dog!! i wonder if jersey is so fast in punishing their human beings this fast? NOT! they seem to get a slap on the wrist atleast for their first offense. or there no animals lovers in jersey that the people allow animals to be treated this badly? PLEASE CHANGE YOUR LAWS IN NEW JERSEY, i guess they don't have any dog hotels at the jersey shores!
 
ctrygg
ctrygg
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I am so glad to hear this dog is not being punished for acting naturally. Poor thing I hope it finds lots of love.
 
Char F.
Char F. (chared49)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
We should have better legislation for bad pet owners.
 
This poor dog appears to have lived with far too many uncertainties and changes. I'm sure he has no clue who his master is, as I'm rather confused about the multitudes of living arangements in this story. He needs some consistant love & attention, the same set of walls as his home, and the same master. A dog with this many changes can become very insecure.
 
gracie6351
gracie6351
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Im glad to hear the dog is finally home. 6 months is a long time to be gone
 
Erin K.
Erin K. (soxtdog)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
That dog has been through so much, I hope he has better luck in the future
 
LILDAGO
LILDAGO
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
The fact that the owner did not just abonded the dog proves the animal is loved.Im glad it is home.
 
Lauren D.
Lauren D. (lauren7g)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Dogs don't understand jail. It doesn't make any sense to keep a dog locked up, rather than make her pay impound fees, they should have mandated she take him to behavioral training so he'd be under control. Come to think of it, that makes more sense than jail for people, too. Being locked up just encourages more behavior problems.
 
wilmacam
wilmacam
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
how sad....
 
Brenda
Brenda (BrendaM)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Sad. I am glad that the dog is Ok and now home. I don't understand this labeling dogs as dangerous and making them wear a muzzle. That is just not fair - one incident does not make a dog dangerous. And let me tell you - technically any dog off of a leash is dangerous. So everyone has to keep their dogs leashed. It is safer for your dog as well.
 
judy b.
judy b. (jbonz)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
This story was very confusing and gave me a headache. I'm still not really sure who owned the dog but I'm glad he was released. Dog fights happen daily. It's part of their nature. Does this make them vicious or just in need of some tighter home constrictions. 6 months seems like a very long time for this
 
Janet V.
Janet V. (janeyv)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I'm glad the dog is finally free.
 
Marie C.
Marie C. (mariepak32)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
why in the world would these two people who got bite trying to get in the middle of a dog fight??? no brains between the two of them.
 
I have two issues with this story.

#1 If the dog was not labeled as a potentially dangerous dog, why the requirement for a muzzle (something usually specified for potentially-dangerous dogs)?

#2 Why, if the dog belongs to this woman, was the dog living with her step-brother, his ex-girlfriend, and eventually her step-father? Why was he not at home with his owner this whole time? Does she not realize that swapping homes like this is very stressful to a dog?
 
Patricia  C.
Flag this comment | Good Point | 1 user liked it.
Reply
At least she is currently being responsible for her dog and has him home with her.
 
kittypassion
kittypassion
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Congo's Law needs to become a federal law. No animal should be imprisioned before any trial has taken place. Also, it should be left up to animal experts as to whether an animal is dangerous, not some government official.
 
animallover95
animallover95
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Poor dog, hope he is home for good!
 
rena t.
rena t. (rena28614)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Glad he is finally at home where he belongs!
 
Amy R.
Amy R. (herplace)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
what a complicated topic
 
rjlupinskat
rjlupinskat
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
If the general gist of 'punishment' for a dog found potentially dangerous is still to go back home (though under restrictions), then why did it take so long keeping him impounded? He could have been home awaiting 'trial.'
 
Christine
Christine (kikgirl2)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Strange to keep him locked up for so long. Poor poor dog, I truly hope he has a much happier and better life now. People can't just treat their animals like things, makes me shake my head.
 
Denise  O.
Denise O. (Deebob)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Sounds like the poor dog went through enough just trying to figure out which home was his...heck, he probably thougth the "pound" was his home to. Poor dog. I am glad he is home...Let's just hope the owner...whoever it is, actually takes the proper care and the dog never finds hiself in the situation again.
 
glad the dogs home
 
Mary G.
Mary G. (Norton)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
This is a very convoluted story. Who did Kuma originally belong to? There is Maria, a stepfather, a stepbrother, a girlfriend???I don't necessarily agree, but do know why he was impounded after his "altercation" with another dog, why for such a long period of time, and why was he "jailed" the other time. Also, why did the chief Health Department official of the town have the authority to have him locked up? Many questions indeed, but Maria seems to care very deeply about him and I hope he is home safe and sound for good.
 
Debbie
Debbie (Shortcircuit)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Glad he got to go home.
 
Angel L.
Angel L. (Etain)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
it is sad that some of these animals can be labelled dangerous when things are not always clear and they do not get a "fair trial"

We recently had a dog that was drowning in the lake, a boy went to pull her out and she bit him, didn't break the skin.... she was terrified and was possibly trying to pull herself out using the only thing available, his arm..... plus she has previously been abused and is afraid of men... now she has a "bite" on her record.... a second bite could cause the state to put her down.... to me this is unfair. I doubt she'd ever bite again, it's not in her temperment, but still.....
 
Brandie A.
Brandie A. (hnddg221)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I hope that kuma is safe now...it sounds like the step dad and all the other people who had him before were not being very responsible.
 
5ineveryroom
5ineveryroom
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I'm glad the dog is safe and happy at home now. I can understand why they held him at first, but why did they hold him for so long?
 
websteranne
websteranne
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Because the town kept postponing his court date...
 
roberta m.
roberta m. (meanwife)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
people should be more carefull
 
Kari H.
Kari H. (Pawwa)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I'm glad he got to go home <3
 
Teresa C.
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Hopefully, Kuma will be in a safe and loving environment now and can settle down and enjoy his life.
 
websteranne
websteranne
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 2 users liked it.
Reply
Hi everyone! My name is Anne. Maria, the owner of Kuma, is my room mate. She and Kuma live with me. Judging by some of the comments I have read it seems some of the facts of the story are being misunderstood. It's a pretty confusing story and I just wanted to clarify a couple things that were bothering me... First Maria never abandoned Kuma. He was abandoned by someone else and Maria and her family took him in. He stayed there in her parent's house for only a few weeks until he was impounded. He was not passed around after he was left with them. Second, he was not left to roam the neighborhood. He was playing in a fenced in yard and jumped over the fence. They would never let the dog run loose intentionally. I could go on for pages explaining the whole story... I just thought people should know all the effort Maria went through. Six months of court and all the costs and heartache. All for a dog that was never really hers. She didn't have to do any of it. She could have just pawned it off on the owner who abandoned him in the first place. Would you trust him in the care of someone who would just leave him tied to a porch with strangers though? Maria thought the owner was clearly not responsible enough to handle it. She never asked for this. She never asked for the dog but she loved him anyway. I don't know a lot of people who would go through all that for someone else's dog. Following Kuma's release Maria and I are now officially Kuma's owners. He has adjusted well to his new home and we are very happy to have him! I can also assure you we take very good care of him. We are responsible owners and it makes me sad to see people think otherwise... For those of you who have been following our case, thank you for your support. I know they have to keep these stories short and they just give you the basics. I would be glad to answer any questions or explain anything that is unclear because I know if people knew all the facts they would feel differently about everything... Thanks for reading though and hearing my piece!
 
D. Rene
D. Rene (mooredr3)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Thanks for the clarification.
 
5ineveryroom
5ineveryroom
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Thanks for the clarification. These zootoo stories do seem to be shortened so much that they leave out alot of info.
 
bell o.
bell o. (lala14)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
sadsadsa dont know what to say only that i glad the dog is in a good home
 
sunnyranch
sunnyranch
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I'm glad he is finally home.....
 
Kathleen
Kathleen (mewlkitten)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
poor dog, none of this was his fault.
 
Marta J.
Marta J. (2pitpuppies)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
If dog owners would be more careful about keeping their dogs under control, the dogs and owner would not be put through these terrible ordeals.
 
Dreamwisher
Dreamwisher
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 2 users liked it.
Reply
It upsets me for people to juge anything or anyone! First off everyone should know you'll get bit breaking up a fight. 2nd why lock the dog up so long. Anyone that has animals,even the Humane Society he was in KNOW what mental problems they develope. WAKE UP people!!
 
Carly67
Carly67
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Poor doogy... Once again an animal is being punished for having irresponsible owners.
 
Tara C.
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Poor dog. It's not his fault. Hopefully that owner is on a list never to have animals again.
 
websteranne
websteranne
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Are you referring to the irresponsible owner who originally abandoned him or Maria who took him in?
 
Lisa
Lisa (Puparazzi)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I wish that not all potentially dangerous animals had to stay impounded, but I can see the potential need if it was the owner's negligence that led to the "dangerous" situation. Obviously, someone who allows an aggressive dog to have the run of the neighborhood, free to terrorize other people & animals would not be a good bet for doggy "bail".

Pity that common sense has to be legislated.
 
Why are many of the laws that exist today so wrong, and many that need to exist do not. Are the law makers we elect just that daft? This makes you wonder. I also wonder what this dogs owner was thinking? Why leave him ... twice?
 
websteranne
websteranne
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
No one left him twice. The original owner did abandon him. Since that time however she has not been involved in the dog's life. Maria, who was featured in this story, never abandoned him. I know this story was confusing...
 
donteatlipglozz
donteatlipglozz
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I also wonder why she decided to leave him with different members of her family, twice, instead of taking him home... I don't understand that. But... atleast hes home now and doing good.
 
Cassie3
Cassie3
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Congo's Law died in legislation? Congo's Law needs federal approval. It burns me up that a stranger can drive up to my house while I'm sitting on the porch and even though I tell him to stay inside the car, he can get out, push me down, and my dogs will be the ones put down. Plus I'll have to pay an enormous settlement to the man who pushed me down because he was afraid of my dogs after ignoring my warnings? Well, you know, that just says all the more for the "Make My Day" Law in Colorado. It would be better for me to sit on the porch with a gun, I guess. How ridiculous.
 
PJ W.
PJ W. (pj0908)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I hope the third time's the charm. Sounds like some irresponsibility going on here and the animal always has to pay for the "crimes of humans".
 
terrae01
terrae01
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I kind of wonder if Kuma's owner is really that good of an owner. Her dog has been left with irresponsible people twice now. I hope things go well for them!
 
Terrae, I was just thinking the same thing. Not sure if that is the best place for the dog.
 
sheri
sheri (moonstardance)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Oh it be great for him to go home
 
bryar g.
bryar g. (bdgill)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
It's sad that kuma had to be impounded, but I can understand the reasons behind it, if he was dangerous to people, i can understand why they wanted to wait.
 
Joette B.
Joette B. (joettem)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I agree that Kuma, and other dogs, should be allowed to stay at home with it's owner IF the owner is responsible and follows all the rules of keeping the dog out of situations which could harm any other animal or person.
 
chris s.
chris s. (scs061107)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
It's sad that the dog had to go through this ordeal...it's the owner's responsibility to keep the dog from situations where he may be dangerous. The owner didn't have to spend any time behind bars!
 
Beaglepawz
Beaglepawz
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 2 users liked it.
Reply
With all th eattention this is getting I would hope that Legislator Neil Cohen would try and get the bill reintroduced. For thos of you on Zootoo in New Jersey, why don't you drop you representative a line about this?
 
Good ideal. Maybe we need to work on one for here in Ohio.