zootoo.com
discover by
pet type

Gray Wolves No Longer Protected, Again

Browse News

NEW YORK -- Gray wolves in the Rocky Mountain region of the United States will once again be lifted from the Endangered Species Act, the federal Department of Interior said Wednesday.

Wolves in Montana and Idaho, as well as parts of Oregon, Utah and Washington, will be affected by this ruling. Federal protection will remain for wolves in Wyoming.

This marks the third, and likely final, time the Bush administration has tried to de-list the wolf as an endangered species. Now, just days before he leaves the White House, President George W. Bush has succeeded in following through on his plan, which environmentalists have argued against for years.

The wolf population in the Rocky Mountain region, some environmental organizations say, are not fully sustained, and could be severely diminished by removing the species from federal protection.

The rule will be published Jan. 27 and take effect 30 days later. It is unclear whether the measure's life will span that long, however, as environmental groups are pushing for President-elect Barack Obama to reverse the rule shortly after his inauguration.

Obama has not spoken directly to the measure, but will "review all 11th-hour regulations and will address them once he is president," said Obama spokesman Nick Shapiro, according to The Hartford Courant.

Whether Obama takes fast action or not, environmentalists are likely to move quickly on filing a lawsuit to overturn the measure, said Jim Unsworth, deputy director of the Idaho Department of Fish and Game.

The gray wolves' endangered status has sparked contentious debate in the Rocky Mountain region throughout the course of the Bush presidency.

They were last placed on the Endangered Species Act in March, then again removed in July. Since then, the wolves' population has spiked, bringing the animals away from rural areas and more toward residential ones, according to the Idaho Department of Fish and Game.

"You can't just keep stuffing wolves on top of each other," said Steve Nadeau, the large carnivore coordinator oft he Idaho Department of Fish and Game, remarking on how the wolves have nowhere else to go.

The increasing number of wolves in town caused a jump in pet and farm animal deaths across Wyoming, Idaho and Montana.

Three hundred and twenty five farm animals in Idaho were killed in November, marking a sharp increase from the mere 47 recorded deaths in 2007, according to The Associated Press.

The Idaho Department of Fish and Game noted the wolves were visiting more private properties than usual, according to Steve Nadeau, the department's large carnivore coordinator.

The wolves' shifting legal status has been particularly controversial in Wyoming, where state officials are pitted against federal ones over responsibility in handling the wolf population. Internal political tiffs have now led the Fish and Wildlife Service to shun Wyoming and focus only on Idaho and Montana, claims Wyoming Gov. Dave Freudenthal's office.

"In the strongest possible terms, the state urges the service to end its practice of allowing politics and public relations concerns to drive the decision-making process for the new de-listing rule," wrote Ryan Lance, Freudenthal's deputy chief of staff.

Wyoming's plan to combat the wolf population would list the animals as predators, which could be shot on sight. It was sentiments like these that led environmental groups to take the issue to federal courts in the late spring, and what contributed to U.S. District Judge Donald Molloy's decision to reinstate the federal protection.

This trend might shift again, though, if federal wildlife has its way. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is now lobbying the Bush administration to remove the wolves from the Endangered Species Act list, citing a need to curb the wolf population and balance the ecosystem.

More than 1,000 wolves in the region would be affected by the police shift.

Protection of the wolves was lifted in March by U.S. courts, but then was again restored in July, prompted by the U.S. courts' ruling that responded to environmental agencies' lawsuit. Environmental groups, like the Natural Resources Defense Council, thought the wolves weren't adequately protected by the states' laws.

They then criticized the recent push to re-list the wolves as not endangered creatures.

While it is not clear how low a species' numbers have to dip before it is placed on the ESA, according to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, issues like threats of destruction of a habitat, disease and predation can lend to a species' enlistment.

Tell us what you think about "Gray Wolves No Longer Protected, Again" below. Share your favorite videos by clicking on the ZootooTV tab. Send us your story ideas by e-mailing us at news@zootoo.com or by calling us at 877-777-4204.

The New York Times, The Hartford Courant and The Associated Press contributed to this article.



Tags


How do you like this article?

68%, 33 out of 48 users thumbed up.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down

Discuss this topic

Comments


638 comments found.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 10 Showing page of 10 Go
 
Kim B.
Kim B. (KimMB)
9 months ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
It seems like whenever I hear a story about wolves, both sides give numbers to support their own believe. It is hard to discern the real truth. I wish all agencies could work together and come up with a plan to protect wolves and manage their population without killing them.
 
Amanda S.
Amanda S. (aomanda)
8 months ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I agree completely!
 
Lisa C.
Lisa C. (ljcclark)
9 months ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Why are politicians alllowed to make these decisions. Why can't we get an Environmental oversight board in place that doesn't kowtow to lobbyists with other agendas.
 
Terri M.
Terri M. (tbarrel3)
9 months ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
These animals still need protecting. I hope that someone realizes this before it's too late.
 
kaye m.
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
man has certainly done our share of imbalancing the environment
 
Karen
Karen (Nonnie96)
9 months ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I agree.
 
Anthony C.
Anthony C. (DragonMan)
9 months ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Go to eyeonpalin.com and see what this crazed woman is doing and do all you can to petition what she is doing and stop her madness.
 
marc h.
marc h. (Holtz128)
9 months ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Sarah Palin's loading her rifles and hopping in her helicopter as i type.
 
Helena P.
Helena P. (monarcbfly)
9 months ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I am hoping that with the new administration we get back all (I know, wishful thinking!) the protection the previous administration has stripped away. Sorry, but Mr. Bush & his crew are not known for protecting anything that doesn't affect their cozy little world. And why is it that animals are put on an endangered list then taken off? This doesn't make sense. Anything endangered needs strong numbers & adequate habitat before this should even be considered!
 
Hooray for The Defenders of Wildlife and Ashley Judd...new video to stop the killing of wolves in Alaska!! The wolves are in the news if it involves Sarah Palin, and so, more people read about wolves. Education!
 
JessieAPJ
JessieAPJ
9 months ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I think that once an animal is places on the protected list, they should always stay on there. There is always a chance of them becoming endangered again. I think it would be better just to keep them on the list and keep an eye on the population to watch for declines.
 
Kristin C.
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
So sad that lives and history are political tools and even the agencies supposed to watch, maintain and do what is best for them is paid off at every chance.. No way to tell what the real story is..
 
Suzanne L.
Suzanne L. (CandysMom)
9 months ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
They should stay on the list, at least for another year or so. They did not invite us into their territory so that we could drive them into extinction.
 
liberalizzy
liberalizzy
9 months ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
We do need to protect our wildlife.
 
Kristen F.
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Wolves are the best!!! They need to be put back on the list!
 
Dorothy D.
Dorothy D. (ABusyLady)
9 months ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
And stay there
 
MillerJ
MillerJ
9 months ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
they should protect theses guys, even if they are wolves
 
Tom F.
Tom F. (TZF)
9 months ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
From the Environment News Service

"Obama Freezes Pending Federal Rules, Wolves May Benefit"

"WASHINGTON, DC, January 21, 2009 (ENS) - In one of his first presidential acts, President Barack Obama has ordered federal agencies to halt all pending regulations until his administration can review them...." For the rest of the story, go to: www.ens-newswire.com
 
JessieAPJ
JessieAPJ
9 months ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Sweet! Thanks for posting this!
 
Julia C.
Julia C. (Jules1GSU)
9 months ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Great looking out for other updates to this article!
 
kyle c.
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
thats good
 
Mercades P.
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
they should be back on the ist.
 
courtney s.
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
wolves are my favorite animal. they should be back on the list!!
 
Dr. Joyce B.
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
We are looking to the new administration for help with wildlife protection.
 
conni F.
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Oh, I just read the earlier version of this. That did not take long to amend. Couldn't they maybe tag some of the wolves for protection's sake? Maybe the vegetarian wolves could be protected :)
 
Meredith  L.
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
It's sad that there are so many people as human population grows exponentially, that these wolves have no choice but to infringe on "our" space. Really, it's their space that WE have taken over, but that's kind of a moot point. The bottom line is that we have to find some sort of balance... Hopefully Pres. Obama will re-list them soon.
 
Anonymous
Anonymous
9 months ago
This comment has been removed.
 
mark
mark (bundy)
9 months ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
now they are going to be hunted and be protected again its a never ending cycle.
 
JessieAPJ
JessieAPJ
9 months ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Exactly. That's why I think that once an animal goes on the protected list, they should stay on there forever.
 
Em C.
Em C. (ghosthunter13)
9 months ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Bush ruins everything. I think that the wolves should be protected cause now a bunch of hunters will probably go out and hunt them again. I love wolves so much, I want one as a pet when I get older but I understand they need to be wild. Hopeful some one will stop this mess and make up there mind.
 
N. Cathy S.
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I'm struggling with this story as I understand both sides. I just don't know what the right answer is. It is not a clear-cut path.
 
Jake B.
Jake B. (QUINCY95)
9 months ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
SAVE THE WOLVES.
 
Jennifer H.
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Why does man always have to play God
 
Carolyn C.
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Nature is only in balance when there are predators and prey.
 
Jamie A.
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Hopefully Obama will reverse this one as soon as possible.
 
Gabbs528
Gabbs528
9 months ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Bush Should have made a better decison.
 
Lisa
Lisa (lizab)
9 months ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
It is a shame that Bush would make such a decision. Hopefully Obama will do the right thing.
 
359doran
359doran
9 months ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Sigh.......................
 
Christine C.
Christine C. (z1ppy)
9 months ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Shame on Bush!
 
Lisa
Lisa (cpmatt)
10 months ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Co-existence is a tough thing and we don't do a good job of it.
 
R.T. F.
R.T. F. (rtfitch)
10 months ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Here's some more current information on the situation:

"A stay for wolves as Obama stops last-minute Bush rules"

January 21st, 2009
By Barbara Kessler
Green Right Now
www.greenrightnow.com

"Amid the fanfare of the inauguration, President Barack Obama went to work on Tuesday, and among his first acts was to stop pending last-minute regulation changes by his predecessor.

The move gave the endangered Rocky Mountain Gray Wolves yet another reprieve in the arduous, years-long battle over whether or not they should continue to receive federal protection.

In recent months, the Bush Administration has pushed through a succession of new rules and regulations, many aimed at environmental projects, trying to beat the clock on its expiring reign. (It’s not an unusual game. Bill Clinton also made many last minute changes - that were later stopped by Bush.)

These Bush Administration tinkerings aimed to keep some of Bush’s and Vice President Dick Cheney’s pet ideas alive by empowering federal agencies to bypass certain scientific review requirements for developments in forests, near power plants and dams; conscripting the Endangered Species Act so it cannot be used to fight global warming and overturning a ban on loaded firearms in national parks.

On Jan. 14, the Bush Administration started the process (for the second time within a year) to remove federal protections for the gray wolves that populate the Northern Rocky Mountains.

But the Obama action temporarily halts any change in the wolves’ status by derailing those last-minute regulations that have not yet been published in the Federal Register, a requirement for activation.

The move gives the new administration time to review the situation - a temporary reprieve, says Andrew Wetzler, a wildlife expert with the Natural Resources Defense Council.

“It thus falls to conservationists to convince the President that wolves still need protection. I’m confident that this is an argument we can win,” Wetzler writes in his blog. “The new Secretary of Interior, Ken Salazar, has already publicly committed that the Administration will rely on sound science when managing wildlife…”

In spring 2008, the Bush Administation successfully delisted the wolves from the Endangered Species Act protections. But a consortium of environmental groups sued and won a reprieve, putting the issue back in the hands of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Department in the fall.

The recovering gray wolves, which number an estimated 1,500 in the upper Rocky Mountain region of the United States, were brought back from virtual extinction with a recovery plan that began in 1995. Many wolf experts worry that they would not survive the sport hunting and predator “control” measures planned in Idaho, Montana and Wyoming if federal protections are removed.

“Rather than remove protections from wolves in a piecemeal fashion, in the isolated locations where they have finally begun to recover from past persecution, the Obama administration should develop and implement a national gray-wolf recovery plan that will ensure the survival of these magnificent animals, ” said Michael Robinson, an advocate with the Center for Biological Diversity.

The reprieve also applies to wolves in the Great Lakes region, which were part of the Bush delisting, though those wolves are more plentiful. They are considered “threatened,” a lesser level of protection than afforded those animals considered to be “endangered.” "


 
Gretchen S.
Gretchen S. (gbste)
9 months ago
Flag this | Good Point | 1 user liked it.
Reply
Obama's action is an encouraging sign. Maybe he really will bring positive change. I'm keeping my fingers crossed.
 
Kelly C.
Kelly C. (czekel)
9 months ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
maybe it will take someone's young child to be attacked by the wolves before people will realize that when their numbers increase, they can become dangerous. The number of attacks on livestock more than tripled in a year... but I guess we as a nation shouldn't focus on that... we should just criticize Mr. Bush over and over again, no matter what he decides. I'm sure the gaming and wildlife organization knows more about what is going on with the wolves than any of us. How juvenile for any of us to start pointing fingers and calling names when we obviously don't know the whole story.
 
clarsax
clarsax
10 months ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
It's hard for me to choose a side on this. On the one had I understand that people want to protect their livestock, but on the other I love wolves and I don't want to see farmers going back to hunting them and poisoning their young.
 
omie
omie
10 months ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Poisoning any animal should be punishable by jail time and/or fines.
 
Lee M.
Lee M. (gridmonkey13)
10 months ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
While both sides have very valid points, I think it is important to remember that we have created this imbalance and this problem. I think there needs to be a clear goal set before any more regulation is set. I agree with SusanLG, farmers need to protect their farm, yet the wolf population needs to be protected as well. A controlled hunt seems to be a reasonable compromise. Though, I'm not sure there is a "right" answer here. We as humans have made decisions effecting the wolf's population and territory that we can not go back on.
 
Amanda C.
Amanda C. (13Alffiegirl)
10 months ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
The wolves, along with other types of animals, are just following their instincts. Even though they can be pests to farmers, we have to think about how when we build farms and such, we're cutting into their homes. What would you expect?
 
omie
omie
10 months ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
When you say, "when we build farms" and "we're cutting into their homes," can I assume, then, that you live on a farm that is affected and you are willing to move so the land can be returned to the wolves? I think that is amazingly big of you to be willing to sacrifice your family's way of life.
 
omie
omie
10 months ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I am pleased to see that the majority of the comments here now are at least admitting that none of us has a workable answer to this issue. Some have mentioned ideas, such as case by case regulations, that are probably getting closer to a solution.
As rowdysdad said, wolves are very prolific and seem to have no natural predators. That may be why they become a danger to surrounding areas so quickly. We used to hear the coyotes yipping and howling at night all around our place, but I have not noticed that since we saw the wolf in our pasture. The coyotes did a good job of cleanup without threatening healthy calves or our pets.
I would hate to see the wolves treated as they were “in the old days.” I have heard some of the "older folk" discussing it. It seems the government actually had hired bounty hunters to go after the wolves and they did not stop until they had about decimated the population. Thankfully, that is certainly not what anyone would do nowadays.
I think the biggest problem here is in looking at it as too black and white – on or off the list. People, mostly, do not care to hunt wolves – unless the government allows payment for the hides. It should not be allowed as a sport, but people should be allowed to protect their territory – just as you would have the wolves protect theirs. And don’t tell me that our ranch belongs to the wolves – it has been here since the homestead days. If ours belongs to them - so does your place. Wolves, cougars, rattlesnakes, gophers, etc. - maybe a few of each should be reintroduced into your neighborhoods...
 
Anonymous
Anonymous
10 months ago
This comment has been removed.
 
Corinne B.
Corinne B. (Murphy24)
10 months ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
There has to be a way to for both sides to come to an agreement.
 
mansion
mansion
10 months ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
This is a hard topic. I can see the point on both sides. I wouldn't want to see the wolves become endangered but i also wouldn't want to lose my pets/livestock to them either.
 
shelbykellam
shelbykellam
10 months ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Wolves can be dangerous around people and animals. I know I would hate to lose a pet to one.
 
ShellyGas
ShellyGas
10 months ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Again! I know they are pests to some farmers, but it will get out of hand.
 
Erin M.
Erin M. (w0277146)
10 months ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Not sure why they are taken off the list if they have been taken off and on a couple other times...
 
Ric O.
Ric O. (rowdysdad)
10 months ago
Flag this | Good Point | 1 user liked it.
Reply
This really has nothing to do with human hunting or shooting sport. Hunters do not consider wolves any sort of game or trophy animal. They are very prolific producers as well as hunters. As the packs expand they need food and range area, they do not share their pack area with others. They deserve to stay, but NOT at the expense of humans.
 
Cassy C.
Cassy C. (Chessie44)
10 months ago
Flag this | Good Point | 1 user liked it.
Reply
It's good that they are nolonger considered endangered, but what about another fall? It has already happened what, 2 or 3 times before, so more then likely it will happen again. They should stay protected longer, but with certain stipulations. If they are threatening livestock it should be ok, or to protect yourself, but then you should have to call it in, to possibly cut down on the shooting for sport.
 
Kelly C.
Kelly C. (czekel)
10 months ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
when i was in kansas, a very good friend of mine told me a story about when she was out trailriding with her dog and young horse. a pack of wolves actually came up and surrounded them. the wolves kept "calling" her dog to follow them...it was their way of trying to isolate my friend and her dog so that they would be easier targets. Luckily her dog was smart enough to stay at her side and get out of there asap! Pretty scary when you think about it like that.
 
sheri
sheri (moonstardance)
10 months ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Well this isn't good news.How long before the are down in numbers again?I'm sure it will be in no time.
 
Gail B.
Gail B. (gailinot)
10 months ago
Flag this | Good Point | 1 user liked it.
Reply
This is a hard call. Maybe it could be looked at on a county by county basis if there is an area where they are being more problematic.
 
Kait
Kait (aradiay6)
10 months ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I really don't like this but I don't know enough to really say anything... =/
Zootoo pet news videos
Giving Thanks With Our Furry Friends

Giving Thanks With Our Furry Friends

Although, many countries world wide celebrate after a fruitful harvest season, in America, Thanksgiving is more than a feast. It is being in the compa…

A Voice for The Animals

A Voice for The Animals

If you are interested in donating to North Shore Animal League visit NSALAmerica.org.

A Diamond in The Valley

A Diamond in The Valley

"The Valley" has always been known for top of the line shopping, spas, and more... But now, you can share the best of the best with your pet.

New Developments in Pet Cancer Treatment

New Developments in Pet Cancer Treatment

Animal Cancer Foundation founder, Dr. Gerald S. Post, informs K9 in the City on the new breakthroughs in animal cancer treatment. There are more effec…

Fashion For all Dog Kind

Fashion For all Dog Kind

You may not dress your dog up every time you leave your house or perhaps you and "Tinker Bell" enjoy wearing the latest fashions together. Regardless,…

The Softer Side of Howard Stern

The Softer Side of Howard Stern

With the capacity to shelter 300 animals at any given time, North Shore Animal League is known to be the “largest no-kill animal rescue” in Americ…

Is Animal Cancer Treatable?

Is Animal Cancer Treatable?

In Brooklyn, Dr. Post, a veterinary oncologist explains that animal cancer is treatable but since cancer is the most common cause for death in older …

Some Run for The Gold; He Runs for The Goal

Some Run for The Gold; He Runs for The Goal

You may remember the New York City Marathon runner, Brayden Mathews, who ran to raise money for United Action for Animals, a long time promoter of the…

True Blue Yankees Fans

True Blue Yankees Fans

The New York Yankees celebrated their 27th victory in the MLB World Series. Devoted fans gathered in Manhattan's financial district on November 6th,…

A Whole Art Gallery, Gone to the Dogs?

A Whole Art Gallery, Gone to the Dogs?

Have you ever wondered what the world looked like to a dog? Well what if "Spot" could draw a picture for you? In New York's neighborhood of Chelsea, t…


View all

Other news of the day

News Archive