zootoo.com
discover by
pet type

Family Saves Dog from Death Row, Spurs 'Congo's Law'

Browse News

SEACAUCUS, N.J. -- Congo will live after all. A Princeton, N.J., court ruling put the German Shepherd on death row for attacking a landscaper last June. But Congo’s owners appealed the case, and a settlement has now been reached – thus, removing that ominously ticking clock from over Congo’s head.

Eds. note: Pet Pulse first began coverage of this story Nov. 14, 2007, "Congo is Slated for Euthanization After Attacking a Man", and published additional updates on Nov. 16, 2007, "Congo is Now Home Awaiting Appeal" and Dec. 5, 2007, "Congo's Law". Please see these stories for additional details.

“I think the settlement itself is a good balance between the township, the state and our family,” owner Guy James said.

The dog’s owners, Guy and Elizabeth James, had contended that Congo acted in self-defense, thinking Mrs. James was being attacked.

In the settlement, the James’ meet their goal of not having Congo labeled dangerous. In exchange, they must maintain the fence around their property, post signs saying there are dogs present, muzzle their dogs when they’re off their property, and notify the township if any of the dogs are sold.

“The day that the judge said it’s over, we kind of walked out of the courtroom like, wow,” said Mrs. James, who now can fully enjoy playing with Congo without wondering if he is going to “be here tomorrow.”

“So the night before the Judge said that, there was always that chance,” Mrs. James said of Congo’s possibility of being euthanized. “So since that day, it’s been a lot easier to breathe and to sleep.”

As a result of the lawsuit and the family’s ordeal, New Jersey Assemblyman Neil Cohen has written pending legislation called Congo’s Law.

The bill would make it tougher for dogs to be impounded during legal proceedings against them, as Congo was for about five months. And animal control officers would no longer have the authority to order death sentences for dogs, as one did in Congo’s case.

“It’ll definitely benefit a lot of people -- I think we’re in a situation where a lot of families are really unable to fight to save their dogs,” Mr. James said. “So I think it’s really important that the law is put in place, so it can protect a lot of the individuals that need to be protected.”

Now that Congo’s life has been saved, the family’s new goal is being launched next week with the Web site Congoslaw.com. Through the site the family hopes to support the pending legislation, and to raise awareness and money for dogs facing a plight similar to Congo.

While the site is waiting to be launched, Congo has his own MySpace page. During the case, the James’ received thousands of supportive e-mails from as far as Africa, India and Australia.

“It opened my eyes to how many animal lovers there are and how they network,” said Mrs. James. “And just Congo’s MySpace page alone, it’s crazy, the people that you meet.”

As for Congo, he’s reunited with his mate, Lucia, and enjoying his freedom. No worse for the wear, or the settlement.

“He’s having fun, living life, enjoying himself with his siblings, Lucia (Congo’s mate),” said Mr. James. “It’s not changing anything in his life.”

Except now, he’s known world wide as a champion for animal rights.

Tell us what you think about “Family Saves Dog from Death Row, Spurs “Congo’s Law’ ” below, and be sure to watch the video of this story at the top of your page. Share your favorite videos by clicking on the ZootooTV tab. Send us your story ideas by e-mailing us at news@zootoo.com or by calling us at 877-777-4204.

Eds. note: Because the details of the specific events leading to today's news story are a story in and of itself, below is a re-posting of the original story as reported by Matt Van Hoven.

Congo is Slated for Euthanization After Attacking a Man

November 14, 2007

NEW JERSEY – A dog named Congo is slated for euthanization after attacking a man. His owners say he was only defending his master.

At 6:40 a.m. on June 5th of this year, Guy James looked out his bedroom window and noticed the landscapers he hired had arrived – albeit an hour early.

From his window, James instructed the workers to remain in their car until he gave further notice. That's because his six German Shepherds – two adults and four puppies – were outside, and he didn't want the dogs to frighten the workers.

Fifteen minutes later, the men got out of the car to begin working. Mrs. Elizabeth James had come outside with her son to look for one of the puppies who had not shown up for the morning feeding.

She noticed the men had exited their car, contrary to her husband's instructions. As Mrs. James neared the workers, the three six month-old puppies approached one of the men, who was holding a five-foot long metal rake.

The dogs began barking at the man, who was a stranger to them, at which point he hit them with a rake. By this point, Congo and Lucia (the adult female) had taken notice of the situation – likely because their pups were yelping in pain.

Another man, Mr. Giovanni Rivera, was standing near Mrs. James and Congo. Afraid of the large male dog, he grabbed Mrs. James' shoulders. She screamed, and that's when Congo jumped at Mr. Rivera's back.

In an attempt to diffuse the situation, Mrs. James led Mr. Rivera to her car, which was nearby, intending to separate the man from the dogs.

Before they got there, Mr. Rivera fell to the ground. In doing so, he grabbed Mrs. James, bringing her down with him.

And that's where it gets cloudy. The dogs began scratching and biting Mr. Rivera, in what the James' call defense of their master. Rivera's lawyer claims it was a mauling.

But neither Mr. Rivera nor Mrs. James could identify which dog inflicted the wounds – wounds that won Mr. Rivera $250,000. Mr. Rivera testified that his hands were covering his face during the attack. Mrs. James was also unable to identify the landscaper's attackers.



Tags


How do you like this article?

95%, 40 out of 42 users thumbed up.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down

Discuss this topic

Comments


548 comments found.
1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Showing page of 10 Go
 
Gina N.
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Congo lives!
 
Saskia M.
Saskia M. (saskia)
1 year ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I would be interested in an update as well.
 
Sandy F.
Sandy F. (sfurnbac)
1 year ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Agreed! Where is the update?
 
Karen H.
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
This is a case of everyone was wrong. Glad the dog was not put to sleep and hopefully they won't need anymore work done.
 
Jamie M.
Jamie M. (jamiedee)
1 year ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Well I am glad to hear that Congo was spared. This whole situation could have been avoided if the landscaper had stayed in their car - but they probably did not realized the dogs were out there. But, the owners should not have left the dogs outside knowing that the landscapers had arrived. Anyway, I believe that 6 dogs is too many for any family and a group like that does begin to develop a pack mentality.
 
LoriHill123
LoriHill123
1 year ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
It has been 5 months, you would think there would be an update
 
Julie
Julie (zipnjulie)
1 year ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
It certainly appears that Congo was given a rough sentence for protecting his master. I am glad that they gave the dog another chance, as it appears that the judge believed that Congo and Lucia were acting in defense of their owner and their puppies. If the man hadn't hit the puppies with a rake, it seems they would never have been attacked, and Congo wouldn't have spent 5 months in solitary confinement.
 
dena  w.
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
the jerks shouldnt have hit a puppy with a rake anyway. if he hit my dog with one id bit him
 
mike z.
mike z. (mzev)
1 year ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
This article is from April. Since then I believe there has been another incident with Congo..
 
pahokee
pahokee
1 year ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Glad to hear Congo is going to be ok. Normally I dont think attacking dogs should be out, but it sounds like the family was trying to protect the gardeners and they didnt listen to the family and that the dogs didnt just attack for no reason.
 
Melissa
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
That is sad that people are so quick to judge. That could easily be me, as I have a protective large dog. He was doing what dogs are suppose to do. And him having to be muzzled while are gone - is cruel. Plain and simple.
 
Sarann T.
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I think that should not change the law.
 
Tara
Tara (taracallahan)
1 year ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
"And animal control officers would no longer have the authority to order death sentences for dogs, as one did in Congo’s case." Since when were they given this authority? Who f*cked up there?
 
Lisa
Lisa (Scorpio1030)
1 year ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Something happened like this here in Denver/Arvada, and they same settlement was given. I don't think there was a law placed, but the woman was given her German Shepard back. I am glad to see that the judge saw it as defending the woman and not just an aggressive dog.
 
angela t.
angela t. (alt1163)
1 year ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
This dog was just protecting his family as he was trained to do.
 
nancy2cats
nancy2cats
1 year ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Happy news that the dog's life has been spared. A good example of what can go wrong when owners don't take steps to prepare / protect their pets and visitors. There are lessons to be learned by all who read this.
 
kaytei b.
kaytei b. (kaytei3)
1 year ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Its so sad to hear these stories where the animal is blamed. Every time it is the fault of the owner or the person that gets attacked! These poor animals usually end up dead because their mistakes. Its nice to hear one story where the dog is actually concidered to have feelings.
 
Jamie
Jamie (jamiepchs)
1 year ago
Flag this | Good Point | 1 user liked it.
Reply
The landscapers are at falt here. They should have done what they were told to do . If they had stayed in the car like they were asked to do this would never have happened. I am happy to read that the dog gets to live with his family. He was just doing what they are sepost to do. Protect their familys.
 
wpras
wpras
1 year ago
Flag this | Good Point | 1 user liked it.
Reply
Most dogs would respond the same way if they have bonded with their owners. My little dog barks each and everytime someone comes to our door.She is only trying to protect the family she loves.
 
Rachel  R.
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I'm glad that the case had a good outcome, this is a big step forward for dogs. I always think that it's a shame for dogs to be put down because they bite, or have bitten someone. Most dogs can be retrained, and become productive canine members of society.

And looking at that story, I could see how the dog would think it's family was in danger. My Australian Shepherd probably would have reacted the same way in that situation.
 
Sarah  W.
Sarah W. (Roxymimi)
1 year ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I'm happy there was a godo Outcome to this story, I would hate for a GSD be put to sleep because he was protecting his family
 
mike o.
mike o. (petdude)
1 year ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Touchy subject, the landscapers are at fault for not waiting to come in and for hitting the puppie with a rake. But the owners should of had the dogs locked up early that morning preparing for the landscapers arrival.
 
JadeGreenKitty
JadeGreenKitty
1 year ago
Flag this | Good Point | 3 users liked it.
Reply
I wonder what part of "stay in your car" they misunderstood? On top of the fact they were an hour early. And !! hitting one of the pups with a rake in front of its canine parents. Sorry, thumbs down to the landscapers and thumbs up to Congo and his family for doing their job.
 
Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
This comment has been removed.
 
Kelly
Kelly (nitewisp)
1 year ago
Flag this | Good Point | 2 users liked it.
Reply
Congo was doing what he was supposed to do. He was protecting his people & his yard. The landscaper should have listened & done what he was told.
 
gavynscott01
gavynscott01
1 year ago
Flag this | Good Point | 1 user liked it.
Reply
I used to walk a german shepard all the time. They are known to be protective of their owners. They workers should have listened and stayed in the car until they were told otherwise. Not to mention if they would have showed up later like they were scheduled to the dogs probably would have already been in the house...
 
Carol L.
Flag this | Good Point | 1 user liked it.
Reply
I as so happy this had a great outcome. This was a beautiful animal who was protecting his owners. If the landscapers had acted as they had been told this would not have happened. -
 
Tessa
Tessa (celtiycknot)
1 year ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
actually in the long run it had an extremely bad outcome. Just read my previous post. Both Congo and 3 of their other dogs were euthanized after attacking an elderly lady on their property.
 
Dakota87112
Dakota87112
1 year ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
What a complete idiot, if he had just followed directions this whole thing would have never happened. The dogs did exactly what they were supposed to protect their owners, my two German Shepards are the same way. I also believe that this Rivera guy saw an opporunity to make some money, because 250,000 is a lot just because he was attacked for his own stupidity.
 
grlsci
grlsci
1 year ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I wholeheartly agree with you. I know my german shepard wouldn't let anyone I did not know within 3 feet of me. They are well known for following commands but if you seem stressed around someone then they try to protect you against them. I believe this would have never happened if the landscapers 1) showed up at the appointed time 2) followed the instructions of the homeowner 3) followed animal safety rules - stay away from animals you do not know or if an animal looks agressive then remove yourself calmly from the situation.
 
Tessa
Tessa (celtiycknot)
1 year ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
PRINCETON TOWNSHIP (WABC) -- Congo the German shepherd attacked again -- this time a member of his owners' family. As a result, the local couple who fought a successful high-profile campaign to spare their beloved Congo from a death sentence after he mauled a landscaper on their property last year had Congo and three of their other dogs euthanized Wednesday morning after the dogs attacked a relative visiting their home Tuesday.
In the latest incident, Congo was one of four dogs that attacked 75-year-old Constance Ladd, the mother of one of the dogs' owners.
Ladd had puncture wounds and lacerations to the top of her head, chest and right forearm and injured her hip when she fell to the ground as the dogs pounced on her, The attack occurred when Ladd walked out her daughter's Stuart Road West house into the yard&. Patrolman Chris King was the first responder on the scene and administered first aid before the Princeton First Aid and Rescue Squad rushed Ladd, who lives in Branchburg, to the University Medical Center at Princeton hospital.
Although police said it wasn't immediately clear what sparked the attack or which of the dogs owned by Guy James and his wife Elizabeth actually bit Ladd. The other three dogs involved in Tuesday's attack and euthanized were Lucia, Hunter and Bear, all German shepherds, according to police.
 
Linda A.
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Something just does not sit right about this second incident. I do not believe that the owner's mother just "walked out into the yard," and did nothing. German Shepherds do not attack for no reason at all. The woman HAD to have done something...like hit or kick one of the dogs for them to attack her like that. She will never tell the truth though, you can bet on that. She was there for a visit...wouldn't it make sense for her to have been "introduced" to the dogs ? This is so tragic...cases like this are almost always because the owner has NOT raised the dog or dogs correctly, and people who get bit have almost always done something stupid or cruel to bring on an attack.
 
Heather
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Since when are owners at fault when people are told to stay off the property and ignore them. The stupid landscapers are hitting the puppies and walking around like they own the place. GSD's are going to react to that, that's their job! It frustrates me that people think it's always the dog (people out in the world, not dog people). This was a case of dumb guy v smart dog. Smart dog wins every time, unfortunately that means the poor dog gets the shaft!
 
Vicki T.
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
This story may be from April, but I'm glad I saw it. How on earth could it every be allowed that an animal control officer would give a death sentence to a dog. I'm glad this situation turned out well, and it's terrific that the legislator got "Congo's Law" passed. That dog was obviously defending his master and how dare those worker's hit the puppies with a rake!
 
alysha  a.
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
the workers should have listened! maybe now they will have learned they lesson the idiots...and to blame the dogs....its their own fault!
 
klpowell2
klpowell2
1 year ago
Flag this | Good Point | 1 user liked it.
Reply
Wow these landscapers are the ones at fault! What idiots, when you come early and the person hiring you says stay in the car we have dogs you stay in the car! How hard is that! These dogs were not at all to blame especially when the older dogs heard their babies being hurt, and when they thought their owner was being attacked! These workers are idiots and the family should sue them for violating their orders!
 
ruthie
Flag this | Good Point | 1 user liked it.
Reply
This is so heartbreaking, to have survived all this time only to be taken in the wee hours of the morning to be euthanized by his owners for another incedent and the pups too. I still think there should be a Congo's law, just needs to be some responsible, decent people to take up the cause, these people were not.
 
Samantha N.
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I agree completely. If the owners were responsible dog owners they would have taken the dogs to training classes. And shouldve realized the already edgy dogs were in the pack attack mentallity. I feel bad for the dogs.
 
Carol L.
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I agree Samantha, how many animals will be destroyed before owners take responsibility, I hate to hear stories like this one.
 
sheila f.
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
What gave the ignorant landscaper the right to hit 3 puppies with a rake? That is crazy. So, glad Congo was saved and has returned to his mate.
 
patty
patty (mikkizmom)
1 year ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
So sad that after "fighting for his life" Congo's owner has now euthanized him and his siblings
 
sheila f.
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Did I miss another story? From this article, Congo survived. Do you now more of the tale? Thanks,
Sheila
 
grlsci
grlsci
1 year ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Yes, there is another story. Apparently in June, Congo attacked or bite again. This time it was the mother-in law of their family. The family then had Congo and his pups put down. Why the pups, I don't know.
 
sheila f.
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Thanks...I later caught that story too. It is just crazy.
 
klpowell2
klpowell2
1 year ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Ummm...It says that he was allowed to go home w/ certain regulations?
 
Linda W.
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I am glad Congo will survive! I feel that the owners put up sufficient notice to be cautious of their dogs. It is hard to judge some cases due to one person's word being against another's. However, if you have all the warnings there, it is the person's poor judgement to go against the warnings.
 
This proves that truth is stranger than fiction. This story has more twists and turns than a mountain road! I am glad Congo is safe at last. Maybe Congo's owners should put up signs saying: "No landscapers allowed!"
 
pskrha
pskrha
1 year ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Just because a dog tries to protect his/her human and another pack member from someone who would hit a puppy with a rake, they got put on death row?
I am glad the judge looked at the circumstances and ruled accordingly.
 
magimae12000
magimae12000
1 year ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I have raised and trained dogs all my life and sadly the events that happened would never have occurred if the dogs had been PROPERLY TRAINED. People fail to realize that these animals can become confused about situations - just as what happened here - the dogs became confused about what was going on, and if not properly trained this will occur every time. It is a safety for the dogs to be under control of good training waiting for commands to get involved and if necessary attack. I've had German Shepard's, Pit Bulls, Rotts and of course less aggressive dogs - all took training and time - never have I had an incident and I have had to call on my dogs for protection twice, luckily they only had to come to my side, that was all that was needed to deter the situation. Once I have them trained - they bite and attack only on command and via use of a certain word or phrase. Lack of good training really is a burden on these wonderful creatures. No doubt there are many killed each year for fiascoes such as this which go untold. It is worth the money to get them trained or structure training on your own. magi
 
wendy d.
wendy d. (wndydye)
1 year ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
im glad that things worked out... but i beleive that if an animal kills some 1 that they do need punishment just like humans..... bless u all.....
 
Erin K.
Erin K. (soxtdog)
1 year ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I am glad that it all worked out. I think that the landscapers also brought the attack on themselves, with their behavior, but the owners are also responsible.
 
KIM S.
KIM S. (PARTYPONY)
1 year ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Thank God someone had some common sense to bring an end to what would have been a tragedy.Obviously the worker didn't possess any!!I wonder though...would same had occured if dog was a Pit Bull or Rottweiller??Should-but may not have!
 
patty
patty (mikkizmom)
1 year ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Glad all has worked out for the dog, as for the muzzle, shame on them for making it part of the agreement. the dog shouldn't need a muzzle while out UNLESS the owners can't control him and I doubt that is the case. Am disappointed the man received such a large settlement. Guess it PAYS do ignore directions.
 
Wileydog
Wileydog
1 year ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
When are people going to get it. Instinct is going to take over when a dog thinks it or its pack are being threatened. To blame the dog for its actions is ridiculous. Personally I believe the old adage that there are no bad dogs, only bad dog owners. To go a step further if you are on someones property you had better do what they say because they know best what their dogs are capable of.
 
anne g.
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Dogs don't just attack for no reason.
 
Janie
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I AM ABSOLUTELY THRILLED ABOUT THIS DECISION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Wendy S.
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I'm glad that the dog's life was spared and he was returned to his owners. It's also a good thing about Congo's law.
 
Amy R.
Amy R. (herplace)
1 year ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
glad there was a happy ending
 
canazziemt
canazziemt
1 year ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I was hoping this story would end this way! Glad that the dog was able to go home and wasn't blamed for ignorant people
 
Brenda
Brenda (BrendaM)
1 year ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
From the original story the owners sound like idiots. And they are inbreeding dogs - brother and sister had pups. Sounds like your typical breeder.... Anyway I am glad that the dog is OK and will be saved from death because it was clearly not the dogs fault - but the owners.
 
Erin
Erin (EEF75)
1 year ago
Flag this | Good Point | 1 user liked it.
Reply
It's interesting how we interpret stories, possibly based on our past experiences. I read this and thought the landscapers sounded like the idiots. Illustrates exactly how there can be so much controversy!
 
Brenda
Brenda (BrendaM)
1 year ago
Flag this | Good Point | 1 user liked it.
Reply
Well the owner told them to stay in their car and then didn't even bother to give further instruction or come and greet the landscapers. 15 minutes went by and they were still sitting in their truck - and no sign of the owners still. So that is why the owners are idiots and rude to boot. I personally wouldn't have gotten out of the car myself - but would have driven away so as not to waste my time. The landscapers should have done the same. But they didn't.
 
PETPATIENCE
PETPATIENCE
1 year ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
If there in business you would think they would of heard of a cell phone. Had they been more patient this would never ever even been an issue
 
PETPATIENCE
PETPATIENCE
1 year ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
sibblings mean brother & sister
Zootoo pet news videos
Giving Thanks With Our Furry Friends

Giving Thanks With Our Furry Friends

Although, many countries world wide celebrate after a fruitful harvest season, in America, Thanksgiving is more than a feast. It is being in the compa…

A Voice for The Animals

A Voice for The Animals

If you are interested in donating to North Shore Animal League visit NSALAmerica.org.

A Diamond in The Valley

A Diamond in The Valley

"The Valley" has always been known for top of the line shopping, spas, and more... But now, you can share the best of the best with your pet.

New Developments in Pet Cancer Treatment

New Developments in Pet Cancer Treatment

Animal Cancer Foundation founder, Dr. Gerald S. Post, informs K9 in the City on the new breakthroughs in animal cancer treatment. There are more effec…

Fashion For all Dog Kind

Fashion For all Dog Kind

You may not dress your dog up every time you leave your house or perhaps you and "Tinker Bell" enjoy wearing the latest fashions together. Regardless,…

The Softer Side of Howard Stern

The Softer Side of Howard Stern

With the capacity to shelter 300 animals at any given time, North Shore Animal League is known to be the “largest no-kill animal rescue” in Americ…

Is Animal Cancer Treatable?

Is Animal Cancer Treatable?

In Brooklyn, Dr. Post, a veterinary oncologist explains that animal cancer is treatable but since cancer is the most common cause for death in older …

Some Run for The Gold; He Runs for The Goal

Some Run for The Gold; He Runs for The Goal

You may remember the New York City Marathon runner, Brayden Mathews, who ran to raise money for United Action for Animals, a long time promoter of the…

True Blue Yankees Fans

True Blue Yankees Fans

The New York Yankees celebrated their 27th victory in the MLB World Series. Devoted fans gathered in Manhattan's financial district on November 6th,…

A Whole Art Gallery, Gone to the Dogs?

A Whole Art Gallery, Gone to the Dogs?

Have you ever wondered what the world looked like to a dog? Well what if "Spot" could draw a picture for you? In New York's neighborhood of Chelsea, t…


View all

News Archive