Family Saves Dog from Death Row, Spurs 'Congo's Law'


SEACAUCUS, N.J. -- Congo will live after all. A Princeton, N.J., court ruling put the German Shepherd on death row for attacking a landscaper last June. But Congo’s owners appealed the case, and a settlement has now been reached – thus, removing that ominously ticking clock from over Congo’s head.

Eds. note: Pet Pulse first began coverage of this story Nov. 14, 2007, "Congo is Slated for Euthanization After Attacking a Man", and published additional updates on Nov. 16, 2007, "Congo is Now Home Awaiting Appeal" and Dec. 5, 2007, "Congo's Law". Please see these stories for additional details.

“I think the settlement itself is a good balance between the township, the state and our family,” owner Guy James said.

The dog’s owners, Guy and Elizabeth James, had contended that Congo acted in self-defense, thinking Mrs. James was being attacked.

In the settlement, the James’ meet their goal of not having Congo labeled dangerous. In exchange, they must maintain the fence around their property, post signs saying there are dogs present, muzzle their dogs when they’re off their property, and notify the township if any of the dogs are sold.

“The day that the judge said it’s over, we kind of walked out of the courtroom like, wow,” said Mrs. James, who now can fully enjoy playing with Congo without wondering if he is going to “be here tomorrow.”

“So the night before the Judge said that, there was always that chance,” Mrs. James said of Congo’s possibility of being euthanized. “So since that day, it’s been a lot easier to breathe and to sleep.”

As a result of the lawsuit and the family’s ordeal, New Jersey Assemblyman Neil Cohen has written pending legislation called Congo’s Law.

The bill would make it tougher for dogs to be impounded during legal proceedings against them, as Congo was for about five months. And animal control officers would no longer have the authority to order death sentences for dogs, as one did in Congo’s case.

“It’ll definitely benefit a lot of people -- I think we’re in a situation where a lot of families are really unable to fight to save their dogs,” Mr. James said. “So I think it’s really important that the law is put in place, so it can protect a lot of the individuals that need to be protected.”

Now that Congo’s life has been saved, the family’s new goal is being launched next week with the Web site Congoslaw.com. Through the site the family hopes to support the pending legislation, and to raise awareness and money for dogs facing a plight similar to Congo.

While the site is waiting to be launched, Congo has his own MySpace page. During the case, the James’ received thousands of supportive e-mails from as far as Africa, India and Australia.

“It opened my eyes to how many animal lovers there are and how they network,” said Mrs. James. “And just Congo’s MySpace page alone, it’s crazy, the people that you meet.”

As for Congo, he’s reunited with his mate, Lucia, and enjoying his freedom. No worse for the wear, or the settlement.

“He’s having fun, living life, enjoying himself with his siblings, Lucia (Congo’s mate),” said Mr. James. “It’s not changing anything in his life.”

Except now, he’s known world wide as a champion for animal rights.

Tell us what you think about “Family Saves Dog from Death Row, Spurs “Congo’s Law’ ” below, and be sure to watch the video of this story at the top of your page. Share your favorite videos by clicking on the ZootooTV tab. Send us your story ideas by e-mailing us at news@zootoo.com or by calling us at 877-777-4204.

Eds. note: Because the details of the specific events leading to today's news story are a story in and of itself, below is a re-posting of the original story as reported by Matt Van Hoven.

Congo is Slated for Euthanization After Attacking a Man

November 14, 2007

NEW JERSEY – A dog named Congo is slated for euthanization after attacking a man. His owners say he was only defending his master.

At 6:40 a.m. on June 5th of this year, Guy James looked out his bedroom window and noticed the landscapers he hired had arrived – albeit an hour early.

From his window, James instructed the workers to remain in their car until he gave further notice. That's because his six German Shepherds – two adults and four puppies – were outside, and he didn't want the dogs to frighten the workers.

Fifteen minutes later, the men got out of the car to begin working. Mrs. Elizabeth James had come outside with her son to look for one of the puppies who had not shown up for the morning feeding.

She noticed the men had exited their car, contrary to her husband's instructions. As Mrs. James neared the workers, the three six month-old puppies approached one of the men, who was holding a five-foot long metal rake.

The dogs began barking at the man, who was a stranger to them, at which point he hit them with a rake. By this point, Congo and Lucia (the adult female) had taken notice of the situation – likely because their pups were yelping in pain.

Another man, Mr. Giovanni Rivera, was standing near Mrs. James and Congo. Afraid of the large male dog, he grabbed Mrs. James' shoulders. She screamed, and that's when Congo jumped at Mr. Rivera's back.

In an attempt to diffuse the situation, Mrs. James led Mr. Rivera to her car, which was nearby, intending to separate the man from the dogs.

Before they got there, Mr. Rivera fell to the ground. In doing so, he grabbed Mrs. James, bringing her down with him.

And that's where it gets cloudy. The dogs began scratching and biting Mr. Rivera, in what the James' call defense of their master. Rivera's lawyer claims it was a mauling.

But neither Mr. Rivera nor Mrs. James could identify which dog inflicted the wounds – wounds that won Mr. Rivera $250,000. Mr. Rivera testified that his hands were covering his face during the attack. Mrs. James was also unable to identify the landscaper's attackers.

Bookmark & Share: Newsvine Newsvine  Digg Digg  Del.icio.us Del.icio.us  Reddit Reddit


Tags


How do you like this article?

100%, 5 out of 5 users thumbed up.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down

Discuss this topic

Comments



179 comments found.
 
klpowell2
klpowell2
1 day ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Wow these landscapers are the ones at fault! What idiots, when you come early and the person hiring you says stay in the car we have dogs you stay in the car! How hard is that! These dogs were not at all to blame especially when the older dogs heard their babies being hurt, and when they thought their owner was being attacked! These workers are idiots and the family should sue them for violating their orders!
 
ruthie
ruthie (ruthiegirl66)
4 weeks ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
This is so heartbreaking, to have survived all this time only to be taken in the wee hours of the morning to be euthanized by his owners for another incedent and the pups too. I still think there should be a Congo's law, just needs to be some responsible, decent people to take up the cause, these people were not.
 
What gave the ignorant landscaper the right to hit 3 puppies with a rake? That is crazy. So, glad Congo was saved and has returned to his mate.
 
patty
patty (mikkizmom)
1 month ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
So sad that after "fighting for his life" Congo's owner has now euthanized him and his siblings
 
klpowell2
klpowell2
1 day ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Ummm...It says that he was allowed to go home w/ certain regulations?
 
Did I miss another story? From this article, Congo survived. Do you now more of the tale? Thanks,
Sheila
 
Linda W.
Linda W. (Cateyes76)
1 month ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I am glad Congo will survive! I feel that the owners put up sufficient notice to be cautious of their dogs. It is hard to judge some cases due to one person's word being against another's. However, if you have all the warnings there, it is the person's poor judgement to go against the warnings.
 
This proves that truth is stranger than fiction. This story has more twists and turns than a mountain road! I am glad Congo is safe at last. Maybe Congo's owners should put up signs saying: "No landscapers allowed!"
 
pskrha
pskrha
1 month ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Just because a dog tries to protect his/her human and another pack member from someone who would hit a puppy with a rake, they got put on death row?
I am glad the judge looked at the circumstances and ruled accordingly.
 
I have raised and trained dogs all my life and sadly the events that happened would never have occurred if the dogs had been PROPERLY TRAINED. People fail to realize that these animals can become confused about situations - just as what happened here - the dogs became confused about what was going on, and if not properly trained this will occur every time. It is a safety for the dogs to be under control of good training waiting for commands to get involved and if necessary attack. I've had German Shepard's, Pit Bulls, Rotts and of course less aggressive dogs - all took training and time - never have I had an incident and I have had to call on my dogs for protection twice, luckily they only had to come to my side, that was all that was needed to deter the situation. Once I have them trained - they bite and attack only on command and via use of a certain word or phrase. Lack of good training really is a burden on these wonderful creatures. No doubt there are many killed each year for fiascoes such as this which go untold. It is worth the money to get them trained or structure training on your own. magi
 
wendy d.
wendy d. (wndydye)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
im glad that things worked out... but i beleive that if an animal kills some 1 that they do need punishment just like humans..... bless u all.....
 
Erin K.
Erin K. (soxtdog)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I am glad that it all worked out. I think that the landscapers also brought the attack on themselves, with their behavior, but the owners are also responsible.
 
KIM S.
KIM S. (PARTYPONY)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Thank God someone had some common sense to bring an end to what would have been a tragedy.Obviously the worker didn't possess any!!I wonder though...would same had occured if dog was a Pit Bull or Rottweiller??Should-but may not have!
 
patty
patty (mikkizmom)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Glad all has worked out for the dog, as for the muzzle, shame on them for making it part of the agreement. the dog shouldn't need a muzzle while out UNLESS the owners can't control him and I doubt that is the case. Am disappointed the man received such a large settlement. Guess it PAYS do ignore directions.
 
Wileydog
Wileydog
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
When are people going to get it. Instinct is going to take over when a dog thinks it or its pack are being threatened. To blame the dog for its actions is ridiculous. Personally I believe the old adage that there are no bad dogs, only bad dog owners. To go a step further if you are on someones property you had better do what they say because they know best what their dogs are capable of.
 
anne g.
anne g. (cuteambros15)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Dogs don't just attack for no reason.
 
I AM ABSOLUTELY THRILLED ABOUT THIS DECISION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Wendy S.
Wendy S. (sassysatin)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I'm glad that the dog's life was spared and he was returned to his owners. It's also a good thing about Congo's law.
 
Amy R.
Amy R. (herplace)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
glad there was a happy ending
 
canazziemt
canazziemt
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I was hoping this story would end this way! Glad that the dog was able to go home and wasn't blamed for ignorant people
 
Brenda
Brenda (BrendaM)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
From the original story the owners sound like idiots. And they are inbreeding dogs - brother and sister had pups. Sounds like your typical breeder.... Anyway I am glad that the dog is OK and will be saved from death because it was clearly not the dogs fault - but the owners.
 
Erin
Erin (EEF75)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 1 user liked it.
Reply
It's interesting how we interpret stories, possibly based on our past experiences. I read this and thought the landscapers sounded like the idiots. Illustrates exactly how there can be so much controversy!
 
PETPATIENCE
PETPATIENCE
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
sibblings mean brother & sister
 
Brenda
Brenda (BrendaM)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 1 user liked it.
Reply
Well the owner told them to stay in their car and then didn't even bother to give further instruction or come and greet the landscapers. 15 minutes went by and they were still sitting in their truck - and no sign of the owners still. So that is why the owners are idiots and rude to boot. I personally wouldn't have gotten out of the car myself - but would have driven away so as not to waste my time. The landscapers should have done the same. But they didn't.
 
PETPATIENCE
PETPATIENCE
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
If there in business you would think they would of heard of a cell phone. Had they been more patient this would never ever even been an issue
 
T R.
T R. (PartiPomMom)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Dogs will protect their property...
 
Brenda
Brenda (BrendaM)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
That is true - and their pups.
 
margo c.
margo c. (SliderIzzy)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
These people clearly told the men to wait in the car, and they disobeyed. These dogs were simply doing what they have been bred to do for the last hundreds of years. Thankgod Congo wasn't put to sleep, how sad that would have been.
 
Ashley  H.
Flag this comment | Good Point | 1 user liked it.
Reply
My german shepard attacked my neighbor when we were little playing in my backyard. He grabbed me and I started screaming and my dog Dusty jumped on him and pushed him over. This was simply to protect me. Whenever we were in the front yard he would watch us from the gate, and if my little sister started screaming or crying he would go crazy. He was simply protecting us. I do not think you or your dog should be held accountable if someone is on your property. These people clearly told the men to wait in the car, and they disobeyed. These dogs were simply doing what they have been bred to do for the last hundreds of years. Thankgod Congo wasn't put to sleep, how sad that would have been.
 
Stephanie W.
Flag this comment | Good Point | 2 users liked it.
Reply
Ok this is ridiculous. Im sorry but this muzzling dogs when they are out of your property and being told to keep a fence around your yard is just plain stupid. #1 who in there right mind will walk onto someones property when there is a noticiably big dog in the yard. It was his own stupidity. Dogs will protect whats theres including there owners as well as there yard. He shouldnt have one anything because it was his fault the dog attacked. Stay out of the yard next time and call the owner to come out before you enter. It doesnt take a genius.
 
PETPATIENCE
PETPATIENCE
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
You are absolutely right! what happens when they are walking their dogs & their about to be mugged or worse abducted the dogs are useless at this point as there dogs can only watch it happen to the ones they love
 
Tracee G.
Tracee G. (tracee)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I agree
 
mary d.
mary d. (frogbowler)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
i agree
 
wendy T.
wendy T. (breeze35)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I agree
 
Brian  K.
Brian K. (ntzr1972)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I think that the compromise from the local and state government as well as the family was great. I wish that all areas would be able to work things out and keep dogs alive.

I will try to remember to hit is MySpace page up. I am sure my dogs will like to be his friend too.
 
Carly67
Carly67
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
The dogs were protecting their puppies. I am glad they were not euthanized. I am happy this law is being passed.
 
jbean
jbean
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 1 user liked it.
Reply
We have 2 GSD and we picked this breed because of their size and loyalty. Anytime we have someone work on our house I crate them for everyone's safety. Even if he didn't speak English, if you see a large dog in someone's yard would you just take off walking into that yard without caution? I'm glad to see the dog at home with his family. It does seem to be a fair solution.
 
Maryann B.
Maryann B. (maryannb)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
sounds like a great solution, and a learning experience for all. I will be checking out the congos law website.
 
Deborah S.
Deborah S. (Debs)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 1 user liked it.
Reply
This is the first I've heard about this story. I'm glad to hear it worked out for the family and Congo. I too hope that this law works and that others will follow suit. I've known many dogs that have lost their lives due to similar cirumstances and also those who were falsely accused. A human being is innocent until proven guilty. The same should apply to animals.
 
selena s.
selena s. (sstarr79)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I agree
 
Kimberly B.
Kimberly B. (Kad46)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I'm glad everything turned out for this beautiful dog
 
Pat H.
Pat H. (LuvsDals)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I'm glad Congo is home... wish people would learn how to be around animals and not provoke them out of their own fear. They are a part of our world too. I had a GS and people would act in the stupidest ways around him even though he was just sitting at my feet.
 
Danielle W.
Flag this comment | Good Point | 1 user liked it.
Reply
I am the mother of a child who was attacked and injured on our property by a dog who was not contained or supervised by the owners. The owners refused to handle the dog in anyway. Animal control did pick up the dog and the owners refused to follow the dangerous dog laws in our county, sadly the dog was put down. My question is would this law keep animal control from picking up dogs that are not on the owners property and hurting someone?
 
good the dog was just doing what it was suppose to do!
 
Martha P.
Martha P. (damarpi)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
It's a good law, a good compromise -- protects outsiders from dangerous dogs and protects dogs from being too severely punished for misreading an outsider's intentions.
 
Kate H.
Kate H. (dixiepets)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
They probably didn't understand the owners becasue the workers didn't understand English. When I lived in FL I had some workers come to my house to do some painting. I went outside to tell them to stay in their van while I bring the dogs in. They didn't all 4 got out of the van and my dog Shelby came around the corner barking, they all jumped back into the van and shut the door. When I got the dogs in the house I had one of the workers show me his hand with only 3 fingers and speaking in Spanish I quess he was trying to tell me he was bitten by a dog at one time
 
dawn  h.
dawn h. (dawnt)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
good for Congo- I am glad he will be saved. These legal matters have become insane. Maybe if people tried helping each other instead of suing, we'd have a more peace on earth.
 
mary m.
mary m. (nuts4mutts)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
YES!!! I am so happy to hear of Congo`s good news. It`s too bad the family had to go through such an awful ordeal when the worker was completly at fault. I bet Congo is happy to be home where he belongs. :]
 
Elisha C.
Flag this comment | Good Point | 1 user liked it.
Reply
Its amazing that people can sue for every thing. You do not have rights anymore to your pets or property. Its sad that the law has come to this.
 
Kelly
Kelly (KellyJedlicki)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Good news for Congo.
Unfortunately the landscapers did not heed warnings from the owners and proper enclosure may have played a part in this but the bottom line is that hopefully there is greater awareness for all and that dogs/humans won't suffer.
 
Kim R.
Kim R. (kregan)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Sounds unprovoked, but maybe this will help the family understand the dogs should be kept confined properly and understand their power. We sometimes forget that when they are "pets". Many folks don't speak our language and we can't assume they know what we are saying, or heard us speaking to them.
 
Denise L.
Flag this comment | Good Point | 1 user liked it.
Reply
Congo WAS provoked. The landscaper hit him with a metal rake! Also, he grabbed the female owner & pulled her down in front of him...if that's not being provoked, than I don't know what is! I do agree that the owners should've had a fenced yard, but still, the landscaper did not listen to them, which is the landscaper's fault.
 
Beth I.
Beth I. (MEBI38)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Great news! I don't like the owners having to muzzle Congo when not contained, but I guess that's a small price to pay. What a huge relief. Also, it might send a signal to anyone that works on the James' property. Pay attention to what the owner is telling you. Don't assume you know what anyone is saying. Thanks for a wonderful happy follow up!
 
This can happen to anyone. Animals have an instinct to protect. Glad these owners did what they did - many dogs "bite" for a reason - most people don't care and want to overlook what that reason is.
 
I have known people who have gone through this same situation at the cost of thier dogs life when the whole situation could have been avoided. I am glad Congo returned home and that his family stood up for thier dogs right to protect thier home. That is one of the reasons people get dogs for protection.
 
momtojjl
momtojjl
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 2 users liked it.
Reply
It is so important that all the details be looked at before an animal is put to death. Dogs protect their owners and that should not put them in jeopardy of being killed.
 
kittypassion
kittypassion
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
This should have never gone this far, but I think it's wonderful Congo is saved and home again. I look forward to their website so we all can help people who fall into this situation. The law should be passed.
 
Carol Ann
Carol Ann (camsolares)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I remember this story and I am glad that Congo is finally home with his family where he should be.
 
suecase1948
suecase1948
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Congo Did What Congo was suppose to Do
Congo Is My Hero
 
Divaspaw
Divaspaw
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I hope they take the money back from Mr. Riveria. Way to go Congo's family!
 
tanyam
tanyam
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 1 user liked it.
Reply
im glad the dog was able to go home, the man he attacked was interfering with his family, maybe if they had listened to the husband no one would have been hurt. if its anyone fault its the workers and they should have been found at fault for what happened, not congo