Ex-Mayor Ordered to Return Stolen Dog


McALLEN, Texas – In a case that drew worldwide attention, custody has been settled for the Texas Shih Tzu, named Puddles, or Panchito, depending on which owner is

calling the pooch.

One of those owners is Grace Saenz-Lopez, the former mayor of Alice, a southern Texas town of less than 20,000 residents.

But earlier this week, District Judge Richard Terrell ordered her to return “Panchito” to Rudy Gutierrez and Shelly Cavazos, who were determined to be the original owners of Puddles.

The story begins with Saenz-Lopez agreeing to pet-sit Puddles, late last year, while the couple vacationed. During their trip, Saenz-Lopez informed the neighbors that Puddles had died. However, three months later, a relative of the couple spotted Puddles being groomed at a local vendor.

That’s when the story hit the media circuit. At that time, Saenz-Lopez was the mayor of Alice, an office she had held since 2003. But with headlines like “Texas mayor steals dog” buffeting the tiny town, a recall petition began circulating.

Saenz-Lopez then resigned in February, about the same time she appeared on NBC’s “Today” show, where she said, “I didn’t steal the dog. I did not return him to save his life.”

As previously reported by Pet Pulse on Jan.2, Guitierrez and Cavazos admitted that the dog was deathly ill and in need of care when they went away. Puddles had gotten trapped under his home a few weeks earlier and when he finally surfaced, he had been almost eaten alive by fleas.

The mayor called the family a day after their departure to tell them that Puddles had died. Given his condition, the family believed the news and said they were very upset.

It still is not known how the dog got out from under the house, if his owners tried to help him, or why the family didn’t take Puddles to the vet before they went away.

Nevertheless, the judge heard from Dee Ann Torres, the couple’s attorney, her clients had cared for Puddles just as well as Saenz-Lopez.

“She is no way a humanitarian in taking this pet away from its owners,” Torres told The Associated Press. “They love that little dog.”

Despite being “broken-hearted,” Saenz-Lopez returned the dog Thursday afternoon, but still faces two felony counts of tampering with evidence and concealing evidence. A preliminary hearing on those charges is scheduled for Tuesday.

Tell us what you think about “Ex-Mayor Ordered to Return Stolen Dog” below. Share your favorite videos by clicking on the ZootooTV tab. Send us your story ideas by e-mailing us at news@zootoo.com or by calling us at 877-777-4204.

Bookmark & Share: Newsvine Newsvine  Digg Digg  Del.icio.us Del.icio.us  Reddit Reddit


Tags


How do you like this article?

62%, 5 out of 8 users thumbed up.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down

Discuss this topic

Comments



132 comments found.
 
patty78050
patty78050
3 weeks ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
i would like to hear a follow up on what happened before she took the dog, maybe both parties were in the wrong and the pet should be placed elsewhere, guess we may never know.
 
Liz
Liz (PurrPurrsMom)
1 month ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I can understand why the ex-mayor did what she did. But she souldn't have lied.
 
ChicoianVolenteer
ChicoianVolenteer
1 month ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
The ex-mayor had the right idea, but stealing it, lying about its death....that's wrong.
 
Brian D.
Brian D. (briannikki)
1 month ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Both the Ex-Mayor and the dog owners she be put in jail. the Ex-Mayor for stealing the day and the owners for neglicate
 
saddleup1003
saddleup1003
1 month ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Neither the Mayor nor the "owners" should have the dog. The Mayor was wrong in telling the owners the dog died. deceptive practices. The owners were negligent in leaving a dog while it was deathly ill without treatment. That smells like abuse to me. A reputable rescue should get the dog, so it can be put into a loving forever home.
 
Gail A.
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
And this is what our government is spending our hard earned money on!!!! Seems to me this could have been settled out of court with arbitration. Instead tax payers had to foot the bill! Insulting.
 
sheri
sheri (moonstardance)
1 month ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Strange not enough facts.The mayor handle it wrong.How can you go on vac with a sick animal.Hope the little guy gets better care.
 
To leave on vacation with a dog that was 'deathly ill' is unconscionable. The mayor's call to the owners, the day after they left and reporting something false, was wrong. Why didn't the mayor surrender the dog to a veterinarian and pay for its care until the owners' return. It seems this would have achieved the result of the dog living and regaining its health without a tussle over who owned it. Sigh ... the real criminal part is that the dog was saved, but now what will happen to it? Dogs are not pawns in some chess game!
 
annabellsmom
annabellsmom
1 month ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Poor dog. Had to go back to people who did not take care of him.
 
kittiesRsweet
kittiesRsweet
1 month ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
The owners definitely should have taken better care of the dog but stealing the dog wasn't the answer either.
 
wo
wo
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
the mayor i believe thought she was helping this dog. but, she was wrong in the way she handled it. and how could these owners love this dog and just leave it with a sitter and go on vacation. if they loved it they could of gone of vacation, after they took it to a vet, to make sure it would live. than just left it at the vet to take care and treat the dog why they were away. why would they not think to do that.
 
anne g.
anne g. (cuteambros15)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I feel bad for the dog he should be wherever he wants to be.
 
pitbullprincess777
pitbullprincess777
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
i'm glad the owners haver their dog back
 
Amy R.
Amy R. (herplace)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
i'm glad the real owners have their dog back, however if they didn not seek the medical treatment that their dog needed they may not deserve the dog back. It was uncalled for to have some one tell you the pet died and then just claim him for your own. If there are that many issues with it maybe ASPCA should have gotten involved.
 
Brenda
Brenda (BrendaM)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 1 user liked it.
Reply
Did she fix the dog up? If she did then the owers who refused to should not have gotten the dog back. The original owners don't sound too responsible if the dog was "deathly ill" and they did nothing to even check him out. I guess the money that they would have spent on the vet might have interferred with their vacation..... Why are so many pet ownders idiots?
 
Michael
Michael (Panther1)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 1 user liked it.
Reply
what is trulyastonding is how there is no standards for providing adequate care for pets...every city has its own rules..i read a different story about a man who took his 15 year old cat in to be euthanized was brought up on animal cruelty charges because he never took the cat to the vet at all (though the cat did develope sores on his feet towards the end)...these people lose a dog under their own house and leave it to die from fleas while they go on vacation...it seems charges should have been filed against them...we really need to develope a uniform standard
 
misty s.
misty s. (beesh3art)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
i dont think i would want a mayor like that....just thank thats a dog what else has he lied about
 
Tara C.
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
The mayor should have taken the dog to the vet and filed for abuse if he was going to throw those claims out there. Guess he won't be dog sitting for anyone anytime soon.
 
PartiPomMom
PartiPomMom
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I can't believe they were going to leave the dog and go on vacation, with Puddles being so sick. Doesn't sound like they deserve to have the dog back.
 
Ashley  H.
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Wow, if a mayor is going to lie about stealing someone's dog, then what else are they capable of. I hope they win in court, that is just ridiculous. Yes they are to blame for the animal's abuse, but they still did not deserve to be lied to.
 
ruthie
ruthie (ruthiegirl66)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I agree that I could not leave my pet while it was in medical distress and my vacation could wait, but this mayor had to have known to call animal services and have the case investigated. No matter who you are you have to go through due process and let the Humane investigators do their job. I have seen animal planet and there are cases there that seem to be blatant abuse but are proven otherwise and the whole time I watched in horror and frustration at how slowly they seemed to move on behalf of an animal, this is the law and the way it works, if everyone were allowed to do this anyone could just accuse another and take away a pet. These rules are made to protect everyone involved.
 
wendy T.
wendy T. (breeze35)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
This case has many unanswered questions/concerns.....I don't think we have seen or heard all of the facts.
 
Carly67
Carly67
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
They should have taken care of their dog before he went on vacation. I f you ask me... they do not deserve to have the dog given back.
 
Maryann B.
Maryann B. (maryannb)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Why would anyone go on vacation when their dog is sick then say they love their dog. At the same time, the ex-mayor went about things the wrong way. I think the judge should have ruled that the dog go up for adoption by people who would truly love and care for it.
 
Denise A.
Denise A. (izzybru)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I don't think the people deserve puddles back...What happened to him was deplorable.
 
selena s.
selena s. (sstarr79)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I agree, but I don't think the mayor went about obtaining the dog in an appropriate manner. I don't think either one of them deserve the dog.
 
Danielle W.
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
How could they go on vacation knowing their pet was sick. WHy didn't they take it to the vet when they found it. I can understand the lady wanting to take the dog but you have to do it legally.
 
Pat H.
Pat H. (LuvsDals)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Unfortunately, courts view animals as property, not a beings. The mayor's intentions may have been good, but the execution of her plan was poor. I just hope that the dog ends up with better treatment than it got...
 
you cant go around takeing peoples pets and animals ! if its that bad off call the police or animal control and let them handle it thats their job anyway ...
 
Angel L.
Angel L. (Etain)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
My question would be what is best for the dog.... I can't imagine leaving my deathly ill dog behind to go on a trip, especially unless it had been to the vet first. But what she did sounds cruel......
 
Kimberly B.
Kimberly B. (Kad46)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I think that she should take this to a higher court since the animal had been mistreated and not cared for
 
Kate H.
Kate H. (dixiepets)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
No one wins in this case. I just hope that whoever gets to keep the dog that he will be at least taking better care of
 
Teresa C.
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
The mayor was wrong to lie to them, and if the dog was in such bad condition, animal control should have taken up the case and charged the original owners with animal cruelty. Glad the dog recovered ... hope he stays in good health.
 
Elisha C.
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I guess the bottom line is whats best for the dog? I would not go on a trip and leave a ill animal. I would however probably steal and lie to save an animals life even if it was against the law. Can help it but its true.
 
Joanna
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Things like this are always hard. Who's to say the original owners took proper care of that dog? And who's to say this ex-mayor isn't lying because the dog is cute and she wanted it herself? Unless there's extensive proof either way - vet statements, photos, what have you - this is going to be a difficult case indeed.
 
I dont agree with stealing and lying to the owners. because that didnt help the dog because dogs have stress as well. But in the end the dog should be with whoever take the best care of it.
 
It's hard to comment without all the facts in front of us. But, I will say that it would have been a lot more cut and dry if the mayor had taken the dog to the vets and reported her allegations of neglect. It would have made her look a lot better and also backed her story. If what she said was true, then the owners would have faced neglect charges and would have probably lost ownership of the dog.
The mayor should certainly have had a better understanding of the law and known better. If the allegations are true and she was trying to protect the dog, she should have made a strong case for the dog's protection.
Based on what has now happened, the former owners now have the dog back so if the allegations are true, she didn't really help the dog and created more of a problem.
I guess we need all the facts to really know the whole story but it is certainly a mess.
 
Tracee G.
Tracee G. (tracee)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I agree
 
If the dog was so sick, then the Mayor should have some kind of vet records. She should have know what to do for records and evidences. I just wonder what is what here just like you.
 
Kim R.
Kim R. (kregan)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
The mayor should have gotten a third party involved to document the problems. And lying to the owners, that's just cowardly and SO politician-like. You can't teach if you don't preach!
 
Kelly
Kelly (KellyJedlicki)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
This case has many unanswered questions/concerns.....I don't think we have seen or heard all of the facts.
 
Beth I.
Beth I. (MEBI38)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I'm still hazy on the legality, but I still think the mayor was correct in her actions.
 
This was a wierd story. It did sound like the animal had medical issues that were not being properly addressed - but the mayor went about this in entirely the wrong way. She should have notified authorities if she felt there was a problem - and then attempted to adopt the dog if it were siezed.
 
terrae01
terrae01
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
There are always two sides to a story and I don't know that we are getting all of the facts. However I just can not believe the if you truly loved your dog you would leave on vacation after it had been trapped under your house and was deathly ill. It doesn't even sound like they gave the mayor instructions to take the dog to the vet and care for it while they were gone. If the dog was getting groomed when this whole ordeal was discovered then that means that the dog was getting cared for well while in the care of the mayor. I don't know that the right thing was done for the welfare of the dog.
 
Robin
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
What was legal or not shouldnt even matter in this case,, if they went out of town right after rescueing thier beloved dog,, they should have taken it to a vet and waited for healing before leaving on trip. I think the Mayor did the right thing in this case,, and i would hope anyone would.. YES the thing that matters here is the pain the dog went through,, and the suffering,, and the original owners didn't give a SHOOT!!

Robin
 
vellabelle
vellabelle
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I know someone right now who is faced with a similar problem. They have a neighbor who has two dogs tied up in the back yard that she doesnt take care of. They have called animal control several times and have even been able to get a blurb in the Kalamazoo Gazette about the lack of response. What are they supposed to do....continue feeding and watering the dogs forever !?
 
terrae01
terrae01
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
They should visit www.dogsdeservebetter.com. It is a group that advocates for dogs that are chained up outside. They could possibly help your friend.
 
Carol Ann
Carol Ann (camsolares)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Sounds like there is lots of deviousness on everyone's part. i don't agree with the Mayor lying about the dog's death, but at least it seems as though she is the only one who cares about Puddles.
 
BabyBlueEyes2883
BabyBlueEyes2883
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I honestly would have done something similar. I would have notified the ASPCA about the condition the owners left the dog in while they went away on a vacation. I would have then asked if it would be possible for me to obtain custody of the dog.
 
BarbBrezinski
BarbBrezinski
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Hopefully the owners will take better care of the dog. What the mayor did may not have been right but, she did take care of the dog.
 
Marie C.
Marie C. (mariepak32)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
If the dog was being abused or mistreated the ex-mayor should have taken him to the humane society. especially for someone who is in office, she should have known this instead of lying and taking the dog for herself.
 
Denise L.
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
If the dog was truly neglected and abused, I would be tempeted to steal the dog too, but I know that it's better to contact the police or ASPCA. I really hope that the owners take good care of this poor dog. I'm also shocked that the mayor didn't do the right & lawful thing instead of stealing the dog.
 
cupid
cupid
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
The mayor should have called the police than the original owners would have spend their vacation in jail were they belong. Not to take an animal to the Vet when it is so ill is against the law. I am wondering how this fact was overlooked in that courtroom.
 
John K.
John K. (hugebear)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 1 user liked it.
Reply
that should be a second case pending but i think all involved will let the matter drop now
 
Renee B.
Renee B. (reneebar)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
They should have taken Puddles to the Vets when they got it out from under their house knowing it was ill. I hope they take better care of him this time!
 
rjlupinskat
rjlupinskat
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
It seems that there does seem to be a bit more investigating that needs to be done. However, assuming the true owners have taken care of the dog and the 'under the house entrampent issue' was in no way their fault, then it is insane and sad that someone of such a high authority did something so cruel as to, in essence, steal the dog.