Congo Shocker: Owner Puts Down Freed Death Row Dog

Browse News

PRINCETON TOWNSHIP, N.J. -- “Congo,” the German Shepherd that gained international support when he was spared last April from a judge’s order of euthanization following a biting attack, was put down yesterday after being involved in another incident -- a decision made by the same owners who fought to save his life.

“We’re saddened, we’re grieving, it’s a hard thing to even think about,” a disraught Guy James, one of Congo's owners, told Pet Pulse of his dogs’ sudden demise. “I haven’t slept in two days.”

The shocking twist in Congo’s story follows an incident on Tuesday that occurred when Guy James and his wife, Elizabeth, were entertaining Elizabeth's mother, Constance Ladd, 75. Ladd was injured when Congo and three of the family’s other dogs inadvertently jumped on her, according to Guy James. Ladd opened a door to exit the Jameses house when the dogs rushed in, James says.

“They started jumping on her, no vicious manner, no barking, no growling,” James said. “It was just they were jumping. They like to jump. They were basically kind of greeting her.

“I guess when the dogs were jumping, and their paws and their nails hit her, it ripped her skin pretty bad on her arm.

“But unfortunately, her skin is very thin and I guess one of the dogs, all the dogs, made contact with her skin and ripped it.”

Ladd suffered lacerations to her head, chest and arm, caused by the dogs’ nails when they jumped on her, James said. He says Ladd was not bitten, and insists the dogs intended no harm.

“She has a laceration on her chest,” he said. “It needed three stitches. The most visible one was on her arm.”

Elizabeth James intervened, accidently causing her mother to fall, Guy James says, causing Ladd's most serious injury.

“Her mother fell backwards,” he said. “When she fell backwards she hit her elbow, and she fell on her side. She fractured her elbow and she has a fracture on her pelvic bone.”

Ladd remains hospitalized, unable to walk due to her broken pelvic bone, James says. When she was hospitalized, the hospital contacted Princeton Township Animal Control Officer Mark Johnson, who went to the hospital, where he questioned Guy James, James says.

“I can just tell in his eyes that he was going to do what he can to put these dogs down,” James said of Johnson.

Instead, the Jameses had all four dogs euthanized by the family’s veterinarian yesterday morning, James says. Put down were Congo and his mate, Lucia, both 3-and-a-half years old, and Shadow and Hunter, both age 2.

Johnson had ordered that Congo be euthanized last year after he and the three other dogs involved in Tuesday’s incident attacked two family landscapers. In that instance, Jameses argued that Congo was rightfully defending Elizabeth James, thinking the landscapers were attacking her. The more seriously injured of the two men attacked received a $250,000 insurance settlement from the family.

Congo's death sentence was upheld by a Princeton Township judge, but the Jameses appealed and a settlement reached in April spared the dog's life.

Guy James insisted his dogs again did nothing wrong in this latest incident.

“I can assure you this was not an attack,” he said.

James says he and his wife are convinced, however, that the dogs would again be ordered impounded by Johnson for an extended period, as they were after last year’s incident. James says Johnson would again have sought a death sentence to resolve this latest matter.

Johnson did not return a voice mail left by Pet Pulse seeking comment. He told the Trenton Times, however, that he would not have ordered the dogs euthanized this time.

"We couldn't prove which one had done the biting, so we would not have pushed for a vicious dog label," Johnson said. He says he maintains his belief that the original decision to euthanize Congo should never have been rescinded through a settlement between the Jameses and the Mercer County Prosecutor's Office.

"I prayed to God that (another dog attack involving Congo) never would happen, but in the back of my mind I knew it would," Johnson the Trenton Times. "It was just a matter of time."

Guy James says he does not believe Johnson's claim.

“If Mark Johnson was not involved in this whole thing I would have not put them down,” James said. “Our decision was based on really that Mark was going to come take the dogs and have them locked up for, God knows how long -- six months, eight months, however long it may be.

“And the final outcome would ultimately have been going (to be put) down. Honestly, I wasn’t going to do that to my dogs.

“So we figured we’d do the most humane thing we possibly could. And rather than them suffering through the next six to eight months in a shelter, and then be put down later, then we decided that we will put them down and we will do it ourselves.”

The dogs were euthanized yesterday morning, taken to the vet at 5:30 a.m. to have them put down before Johnson ordered their death, James says.

James says the rationale behind that decision was, “At least we’ll be there with them, so they don’t have to go through the whole ordeal, and we don’t have to go through the whole ordeal."

Congo’s plight last year sparked global media attention and support world-wide from animal lovers, including a protest outside the township's Municipal Court featuring chants of "Free Congo!" The Jameses say they received thousands of e-mails from people wanting Congo’s life spared.

As a result of the case, Union County Assemblyman Neil Cohen wrote a bill called “Congo’s Law,” aimed at making it tougher for dogs to be euthanized after a biting incident. It would also enable dogs to remain free, instead of being impounded, pending legal proceedings involving them.

The bill was passed by the State Assembly but was rejected by the State Senate. Until this latest incident, the Jameses said they planned to continue promoting the need for Congo's Law. They also spoke of starting a foundation to raise money to provide legal expenses and boarding fees for those whose dogs are involved in situations similar to Congo's initial case.

James says he has spoken with Cohen since this latest incident.

“After I explained to him what happened he really understood,” James said.

Since news of the dogs’ death surfaced, the Jameses have gotten many e-mails from sympathetic supporters, though Guy James is also aware of negative feedback that has appeared on the Internet, he says.

Asked what he would tell the throngs of people who have supported Congo and Congo’s Law, James said, “Nothing’s changed. Nothing’s changed about people’s support, and shouldn’t change people’s feelings supporting Congo in the past because he didn’t do anything wrong.

“He didn’t do anything wrong and none of the puppies did anything wrong. We appreciate all the support that we had in the first situation, and this should not at all change people’s minds as to their efforts from the first situation.”

Just recently, Congo, Lucia, Shadow and Hunter were playing ball in the family backyard with a large group of people, James says.

Now they are all gone.

“Probably one of the worst things, the hardest, hardest things that I could ever have to deal with, except for possibly losing a family member,” James said.

Tell us what you think about “Congo Shocker: Owner Puts Down Freed Death Row Dog” below. Share your favorite videos by clicking on the ZootooTV tab. Send us your story ideas by e-mailing us at news@zootoo.com or by calling us at 877-777-4204.

Bookmark & Share: Newsvine Newsvine  Digg Digg  Del.icio.us Del.icio.us  Reddit Reddit


Tags


How do you like this article?

70%, 7 out of 10 users thumbed up.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down

Discuss this topic

Comments



147 comments found.
Show: 50 100 200 Per Page
 
This is a crock. I just don't understand this @ all. Train the people.
 
Why in the world can't people just train their dogs? There has to be something else going on - why fight so hard to save the dog only to put all four to sleep for a behavioral problem that is easy to fix. This is murder.
 
This is why all dogs, no matter who has them or what their purpose in the family, should be trained. Sadly these owners had dogs that were allowed to misbehave and act out - they could have saved so much heart ache and sorrow by taking the time to train the dogs. It takes just a little extra time, a little extra love and patience - the reward is not having the sorrow of this story happening, as it does over and over. Magi
 
Carol A.
Carol A. (FeesMom)
2 weeks ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I must be missing something? Why would you put down 4 dogs because they jumped? My dogs jump, well, 3 of the 4 do and I know they jump. Why not keep them away from people that they may accidentally hurt? I do, what's wrong with these people? That's a high price to pay for being their dogs. Personally I find it a load of crap to do that to the dogs. I hope these people never get another dog again.
 
You said it all.
 
I'm sorry but I think that the dogs did attack. Would you put down all of your animals (OMG I couldn't imagine!) at the same time for an accident. If it was decieded that your dog(s) were going to be taken to a shelter again that is when you could opt for euthanasia. Law enforcement would not stop you from going to your own vet. As long as the dog(s) were put down in the end. May they all rest in peace.
 
Vicki T.
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I just commented on the story about "Congo's Law". Now, I see this article about how the dogs had to be put down. This is just heartbreaking. Thank god the hospital didn't call animal control when my dog accidentally bit my eye. I know I scared him and the look on his face after he did it... well, you could just tell he felt terrible. I love my little dog and the thought of him being in a cage for months would destroy me. I don't have that kind of money to fight a situation like this and, surely, little Blazer would have lost the battle with the law in the end. My condolences to the Guy James & his wife, the guardians of Congo, Lucia, Shadow & Hunter. May they rest in peace.
 
klpowell2
klpowell2
1 month ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Okay I agree that there may be more to this story then what is told, but this family had just been through the trauma of Congo's battle. It must have been horrible for them to know there dog was locked up for trying to protect them. I do not believe that the animal control officer would not have gone for putting all the dogs down. It sounds like there is a lot of bad blood there, and obviously if he came to the hospital to ask them about he must have given some indication of what he was going to do. I can understand them not wanting to put their dogs through that, but there still were other options than putting all of them down. It was a decision that was made far to quickly in my opinion. I can understand wanting to spare the dogs the pain of being locked up but they should have at least given it a little time/talked to a lawyer/etc... before coming to the decision they did. It's very sad that these dogs were put down I wish there could have been a different ending to this story.
 
ruthie
ruthie (ruthiegirl66)
1 month ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Do you notice when the owners are asked to relate what happened they say "I guess" they jumped up, "I guess" they must have scratched. If something like this happens and you had already been through this with another dog you wouldn't "Guess" anything, you were there and you KNOW what happened you just don't want to disclose what happened. These people should NEVER and I mean NEVER be allowed to have dogs again, they can't be responsible for them and they apparently create misbehaving monsters of them. My advice is still, get someone else to represent the Congo's Law issue because it has merit, but these people need to stay as far away from it as humanly possible.
 
Tobybones
Tobybones
1 month ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I think there is more to this than they are telling. WHY would you put dogs down for jumping on people. My dogs jumped on people too, until I trained them NOT to, and I have two, both over 90 lbs. I think this is more the owners fault, than the dogs. I hope they do not get any more "big" dogs that they cannot handle. What a shame.
 
kclementz
kclementz
1 month ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I agree that there has to be more to the story...Are we sure that the grandmother wasn't bitten? If the doctor at ER didn't feel that she was "attacked" would animal control have even been called? Lots of questions...Weird.
 
brooke p.
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
they euthanized all 4 dogs because they couldn't be bothered to train them not to jump? wow.
 
Nelson
Nelson (shadrack)
1 month ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 1 user liked it.
Reply
There is more to this story that we're not getting...

After spending all of that money on attorney's fees and enduring so much heartache in the last few months, the decision to put these animals down does not make sense.
 
ComicKitty
ComicKitty
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
This is very sad. If they just would have hired a trainer or called the dog whisper they might have been able to avoid this
 
Ferretessa
Ferretessa
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
These people should never be allowed to own a dog again. After all Congo had been through at the minimum they should of contacted a trainer and had ALL the dogs and more importantly themselves trained. They may of loved their dogs like they say but they did not care enough to do what was really needed, train and contain. So now all the dogs are gone for something their owners did not do.

 
masihkap
masihkap
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
What was the point of that? That is the worst decision I have ever seen. I can't believe they did that. Honestly, these people don't seem like responsible pet owners at all and I hope for the sake of animals that none find their way into their home again. Obviously, they don't know how to handle large dogs.
 
tanyam
tanyam
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
thats just wrong none of the dogs bit anyone the do what dogs do and jump when the greet you, they could not have been put down for that. thats just a cop out
 
Sonn P.
Sonn P. (Sonn84)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
That is beyond messed up. These dogs weren't at fault. My grandmother has been scratched by my dogs and cut pretty bad know what she does when she comes over? Brings them treats and toys! People like this shouldn't be allowed to own dogs period. I am thrilled he hasn't slept in two nights!
 
Alina r.
Alina r. (rdreams)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
These dogs were not at fault, these people should no better then to allow large animals around an elderly person, true their skin is so fragile and they will bleed easily. These poor dogs payed the ultimate price for somoneone's stupidity.
 
What? This story just doesn't sound right. These people obviously aren't responsible enough to be pet owners. I hope they are not allowed to own any more pets. They received worldwide support in saving Congos' life....well, now the world should rally against them being pet owners. Shame on them. Personally, I am glad he said he hasn't slept in two nights....I hope those dogs haunt him for the rest of his life!
 
moore4dogs
moore4dogs
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
The owners of these dogs seem disturbed to me. I would hope that they are never allowed to have any more pets. This story wreaks of ignorance on the owners part.
 
judy b.
judy b. (jbonz)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Something just doesn't seem right to me about this whole story and this article.
 
BETH  S.
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
THAT IS TERRIBLE.
 
april s.
april s. (april2007)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Wow, what a mixed feeling article... not sure what to think, sad for the dogs, but glad they didnt have to be pinned in at a shelter for god knows how long. Tough decision either way.
 
Kathleen
Kathleen (mewlkitten)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
wow thats just crazy
 
I don't know what to think of this. Seems like maybe some of the dogs could have been spared had they just been split up and had some obedience training. My dogs are jumpers and if they were bigger, they could easily harm someone too; but they jump out of excitement of meeting someone new, no reason to be punished or euthanized.
 
Cindy
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Below is a reasonable & rationally stated arguement from someone obviously close to the initial Congo situation (without Wizard of Oz tunes). Ironically, since most of us on this site are not close to this event, we must rely on information in the written or news video arena. However, isn't it interesting that in the end most of us agree that the common factor in both of these unfortunate events is unfit dog ownership? The lack of appropriate behavior training has been the focus of a great number of the comments. Certainly, noone wants to see people hurt by our pets. It is irresponsibility like this that makes it difficult (but not yet impossible) for me to get an affordable homeowner's policy, and believe me, that makes me a bit angry since my dogs have never bitten anyone!!!!! Many zootoo members have casted some doubt on the family's version of events on this last event- frankly, I don't know. Hopefully, they have learned a lesson from this extremely sorry chapter-- If you want to own large & powerful dogs, then BE RESPONSIBLE and commit to TRAINING THEM!
 
stopcongoslaw
stopcongoslaw
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 1 user liked it.
Reply
Sensible, rational people understood it wasn't a question of "if" but "when" Congo, the vicious dog from Princeton, would attack again.

The sickening saga of Guy and Elizabeth James and their pack of five vicious German Shepherd dogs exemplify the horrifying and horrific results when misguided, fanatical special interest groups are allowed to manipulate, dictate our public safety policies.

After Congo's first vicious, unprovoked attack on an innocent landscaper, lower court Judge Russell Annich correctly ruled that Congo must be euthanized. This raised the ire, wrath and fury of special interest pet hobbyist and lobbyist into an irrational, illogical tirade to "save" Congo. They insisted Congo was inherently a good, loveable, "lick you to death" family member.

The James' children publicly cried - playing to the audience like a fine tuned fiddle. Animal lovers mourned Congo's fate. NJ Assemblyman, Neil Cohen, promptly came to rescue Congo with a revised (watered down) vicious dog law in hand - complete with photo ops! Cohen decried NJ's vicious dog law as unfair - it must be changed - dogs have "rights" he naively and foolishly demanded. Congo was just "protecting his family" was his mantra.

Almost a year later, Congo attacked again. This time, instead of "protecting his family" he attacked and mauled a family member. Not surprisingly, the vocal special interest groups that harassed, maligned and abused our justice system to "save" Congo remain eerily silent! They're praying this story won't awaken public safety advocates.

Every aspect of this second attack and the subsequent actions by the Jameses are suspect, worrisome, troubling and perhaps felonious.

The Jameses should have had their dogs muzzled, restrained and supervised whenever they were out of their mandated enclosure on the fenced property. It appears this was not the case. Violating this statue is a chargeable offense. If these dogs were to escape the yard, a neighborhood child could have easily been mauled or killed.

When a potentially dangerous dog attacks again, the owner must notify animal control. According to reports, this did not happen. This is another serious violation and chargeable offense. According to reports, the Jameses even refused to cooperate with authorities conducting an investigation of the attack.

Knowingly and willfully violating court orders, state statutes, obstructing justice, obstructing an investigation or destroying evidence and conspiracy are all very serious crimes that have serious criminal consequences.

The saga of the arrogant, scofflaw James family must not end here. The public listened to their outrageous rants and convoluted and misleading diatribes to "save" vicious Congo for over six months - while neighbors were forced to live in fear of another attack. Now, we are not only witnessing another display of conceit and deception by the Jameses but also their flagrant and diabolical disrespect for our laws, courts and public safety.

The duty of a public prosecutor is to seek justice, enforce criminal laws and work for the victims of crime. The dog attack victim is not the only victim here. The public - especially children - are also victims in this case.

The Mercer County prosecutor's office must launch a full and thorough investigation of this incident. No stone should go unturned. If any evidence is found that the james broke the law they must spend the maximum time allowable under the law in jail for their reckless, perilous and contemptuous behavior.

Judge Annich must quickly issue an order prohibiting the Jameses from ever owning or harboring any animals on their property. As it stands, there is nothing to prevent the irresponsible and dangerous James family from acquiring five more vicious dogs!

 
klpowell2
klpowell2
1 month ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Okay it sounds like you def. have a personal dislike of this family. I'm guessing that you were somehow involved in all of this because you knew that the children cried, and no wonder! One of their beloved pets was taken from them, locked away and sentenced to death. Wow you sound like a heartless fiend in this comment. In the first place when congo defended his family it was b/c the workers:
1. came to the property early
2. came into the property when they had been told to wait
3. Hit the puppies with a shovel so of course the parents came running
4. Screamed and threatened the dogs
5. Grabbed one of the owners for "safety" scaring her at the same time so she screamed(so the dogs thought that the worker was attacking her)
If that ever happened to me I hope my dog would try to help me/defend me! You sound ridiculously cruel and bitter in this comment. You personally attack the family; even the children!!! Are you suggesting their tears weren't genuine/real or are you suggesting that they should not have been allowed to show any emotion that a family pet was sentenced to death? If that's the case then you should be ashamed of yourself. Get your facts straight the article states that there was no malicious intent when the dogs jumped up on grandma. When people age they become more vulnerable to injury, in case you didn't know that already. As for jail time for these individuals it is the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard! Well let's hope that the children don't cry this time "playing to the audience like a fine tuned fiddle" (your quote, not mine).
 
JOMAMA1
JOMAMA1
1 month ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Gee,you are scary!!I would rather wretch a food bowl away from a "vicious" dog than mess with the likes of you!How sad that your comments sound more vicious than any dog!
 
april s.
april s. (april2007)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
wow, after reading your comment, I am really glad your not my neighbor...seems you know (or think) you know more than the actual owners. Scary!
 
masihkap
masihkap
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Yeah, I agree. I don't like when uneducated people open their mouths, but they tend to be the first ones to do so.
 
As I recall from the first two stories, Congo and Lucia are unaltered, and the other two are their puppies from a previous litter. These people are not only irresponsible owners (in my opinion), but they are breeders as well. You'd think they'd know enough about their breed to give them proper training, especially after the incident with Congo and all the court run-around.

It's sad for the dogs, who had no idea that their behavior was incorrect. They lost their lives because they were born into or purchased by owners who clearly had no idea what they were doing.

I can only hope that they decide not to get any more pets!
 
amyc32
amyc32
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
All 4 dogs were put to sleep because they jumped up and scratched someone?? Give me a break! If these dogs had been trained NOT to jump on someone, then this whole situation could have been adverted. It seems that they did not have much control over the dogs anyway. I agree with others that these owners were very irresponsible and the only ones who really suffered were the dogs.
 
canazziemt
canazziemt
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I find this very disturbing! I would not put a dog to sleep because they jump. The public stood by these owners and then they turn around and do this? i believe that the judge would have not ordered euthanasia for Congo and especially not the other dogs..They did not bite. This is very disturbing and saddening. Irresponsible owners strike again and the dogs have to face the consequences...
 
Cindy
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Yes, ruthie is right. It appears to be a large majority consensus that Congo's troubles are a product of poor or absent training. Another comment alluded to the fact that the dog had been trained by it's breeder. After training my dog, it is very apparent that the result of any training is directly related to the time the owner is willing to devote to ongoing reinforcement. Going to an obedience training course means nothing if the owner does nothing to support the training on an ongoing & consistent manner. So once again, I strongly feel that these dogs were victims of very poorly trained & motivated owners. I do feel that there was more to these stories than is presented, but I cannot help but feel some pity for any pets who are not sternly taught the acceptable limits of behavior. Upon reading the first report about Congo, I sincerely felt that both Congo & the landscapers were victims of this owners' failures. The comment posted below from "PoorGrandma" (let your imagination run wild!) makes me rather angry that someone is accually gloating publicly about this situation- where the punished dog was annointed as the sacrificial lamb. Did the dog do the deed??- Absolutely!! Did the dog know any better, or have the ability to reason beyond whatever minimal training may have been provided?? NO!! I find that in these stories, so many of them consistently go back to ONE theme- - - OWNER RESPONSIBILTY! It is easy enough to explain one bad event, but TWO?? Enough said. . . . .
 
acedogg2001
acedogg2001
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 1 user liked it.
Reply
In my opinion, the owners should not have had the opportunity to do this. The dogs did not do anything terrible. They obviously needed better training. If they new the elderly lady was coming they should have put the dogs in another place where they could not get around her. OWNER RESPONSIBILITY!!!! Why should Congo and his pals be the ones to suffer? They didn't know any better becouse their onwers didn't train them properly.
 
ruthie
ruthie (ruthiegirl66)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I think someone else needs to take up the cause of Congo's law because these people just lost all credibility in my opinion. These dogs and owners needed training obviously, if the breeder trained them then they did a darn poor job and look at who suffers the ill fate.
I also think its bad taste to make light of this news article with such comments and smily faces, if we can't discuss this intelligently then we need not comment at all. Everyone is allowed their opinion but lets not forget these dogs lost their lives due to simple human stupidity.
 
Larissa O.
Larissa O. (Larissa)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 2 users liked it.
Reply
This story is all too sad. I was at Congo's "freedom rally" and from what I remember, all their dogs had been trained by their breeder. Perhaps their rush to a decision on putting the dogs down was the result of the mental and financial stress from last year's incident. In the end, I feel sorry for the entire family, especially their children who adored them, and their dogs which are but now a memory. I just hope that they continue with their pursuit of Congo's Law, needed by everyone.
 
Stephanie B.
Flag this comment | Good Point | 1 user liked it.
Reply
If I had gone through the legal battles they had, I would be emotionally exhausted with the whole situation and the thought of going through it again would be devastating. I think the dogs should have found separate homes apart from one another. Five is too many dogs for anyone to handle, especially big dogs with a history of aggression.
 
Janet V.
Janet V. (janeyv)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
So sad! The owners should have kept the dogs away from people if they were uncontrollable.
 
Such a sad story, for both parts. The dogs and the loss for the owners.
 
How terrible that these dogs were euthanized just because their owner didn't properly train them!
 
roberta m.
roberta m. (meanwife)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
i agreaa, this is a matter of the owners not teaching manners. especially if they have older guests coming to visit. this is just horrible. shame on them
 
angel7774xx
angel7774xx
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
These dogs shouldn't have been put down.it's too bad the owners did not teach them how to act around guests.These dogs were innocent creatures and did not deserve to die.At most,the owners of the dogs should have been fined and made to train their dogs.
 
Anonymous
Anonymous
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
this comment has been removed from the system
 
betty p.
Flag this comment | Good Point | 1 user liked it.
Reply
The James family are really bad pet owners as far as I am concerned. First the dogs need trained. You can not own four large dogs and not train them. You can not own any dog and not train them. Dogs do not come pre-programmed with manners.

If we really do have the whole story of "the dogs jumped and scratched the lady" and that was all, then the dogs could not have been put down. And the proof would be in the "show me the bite mark".

And if they were so worried about a long trial and the dogs in kennels for a long time, if they really were in the wrong, then yes, put them down. But not for jumping and not being trained.

I also hope that any remaining dogs are taken away before he does sometime stupid to them. The other stories states 2 adults and 4 pups. So where were the other two dogs.

Also I do not believe Guy James and Family to be "for the animals" based on this story. I can not truly believe that he would have put them down because they jumped on somebody. Yes, the lady got hurt. But he should have already been working on preventing something like this with training.

What a complete loser.
 
deedee
deedee
1 month ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
You're right Betty.
 
Cassie3
Cassie3
1 month ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
This family fought hard and spent a considerable amount of money to save Congo. I believe Johnson would put them through hell over and over again IF given the chances. I also believe that Johnson broke down this family. Granted, he presents himself now as a "Why, I wouldn't have done anything." Would you believe that, if you had gone through what they went through with this tenacious man?

True, they made mistakes. Sometimes people make poor and often rash decisions when they are weary and tired.
 
deedee
deedee
1 month ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
It's baffling........simply baffling. What are we missing here??????
 
Danielle W.
Flag this comment | Good Point | 1 user liked it.
Reply
If the dogs did nothing wrong why put them down? Why in the world put down your family, take them to training classes. Man!!!!!
 
ourstaff
ourstaff
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 1 user liked it.
Reply
I get the impression that there is more to this then a short story can tell. There may have been some neglect or elder abuse issues and putting the dogs to sleep was one way of protecting the woman in the future.
 
Carryl D.
Carryl D. (carryld)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 1 user liked it.
Reply
Absurd..putting down 4 dogs basically due to lack of training!!!!!!!!!
 
Lisa
Lisa (Spaceylisa)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 1 user liked it.
Reply
This still could have been prevented if they had just kept the dogs in a fence in yard. Poor dogs. I really don't understand these owners. They had gotton a second chance with their dogs and they didn't act on it
 
Gaye H.
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
These dogs were not viscious, just not properly trained. If the owners had taken the proper time to train them then this whole situation might have been avoided. That being said, as a dog owner myself, I would have put them down myself also so that they wouldn't die at a shelter with unknown people.
 
Carol Ann
Carol Ann (camsolares)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 1 user liked it.
Reply
Maybe if the dogs had been properly trained in the first place this needless killing wouldn't have happened. Dogs don't great people by jumping up on them. i felt sorry for these people before but now I know they are really bad owners and shouldn't have dogs!
 
DONNA A.
Flag this comment | Good Point | 2 users liked it.
Reply
Those dogs did not have to die,they needed some training. This story does not make any sense. Didn't the wife cause the most serious injury. They had no idea what the judge was going to say. They jumped real fast to euthanize their pets. They should not have had 4 German Shepherds if they could not train them properly, they are real smart dogs. That is a terrible shame that they died because of their owners. Another case of bad owners.
 
samsamjr2
samsamjr2
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 1 user liked it.
Reply
This story is so messed up. They didn't need to be put down. They just need training, and they were all young so they could learn quickly. And the are shepherds so they are smart and they want to learn.
 
ruthie
ruthie (ruthiegirl66)
2 months ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I think something is incredibly wrong with this story, why would they sneak out at 5:30 in the morning to euthanize 4 dogs. If you really believed they didn't do anything wrong you would fight for them as well. With all the commotion raised over Congo why would you kill all four of your pets???
I am just beside myself and cannot understand why they would think this would be a humane solution to their problem. I feel for their loss but think it was totally unnecessary to do this.