
Congo Shocker: Owner Puts Down Freed Death Row Dog
Browse News
The German Shepherd Congo, who recently won a legal battle for his life, was put down by his owner after another incident. (Photo Courtesy of Guy James)
June 19, 2008
PRINCETON TOWNSHIP, N.J. -- “Congo,” the German Shepherd that gained international support when he was spared last April from a judge’s order of euthanization following a biting attack, was put down yesterday after being involved in another incident -- a decision made by the same owners who fought to save his life.
“We’re saddened, we’re grieving, it’s a hard thing to even think about,” a disraught Guy James, one of Congo's owners, told Pet Pulse of his dogs’ sudden demise. “I haven’t slept in two days.”
The shocking twist in Congo’s story follows an incident on Tuesday that occurred when Guy James and his wife, Elizabeth, were entertaining Elizabeth's mother, Constance Ladd, 75. Ladd was injured when Congo and three of the family’s other dogs inadvertently jumped on her, according to Guy James. Ladd opened a door to exit the Jameses house when the dogs rushed in, James says.
“They started jumping on her, no vicious manner, no barking, no growling,” James said. “It was just they were jumping. They like to jump. They were basically kind of greeting her.
“I guess when the dogs were jumping, and their paws and their nails hit her, it ripped her skin pretty bad on her arm.
“But unfortunately, her skin is very thin and I guess one of the dogs, all the dogs, made contact with her skin and ripped it.”
Ladd suffered lacerations to her head, chest and arm, caused by the dogs’ nails when they jumped on her, James said. He says Ladd was not bitten, and insists the dogs intended no harm.
“She has a laceration on her chest,” he said. “It needed three stitches. The most visible one was on her arm.”
Elizabeth James intervened, accidently causing her mother to fall, Guy James says, causing Ladd's most serious injury.
“Her mother fell backwards,” he said. “When she fell backwards she hit her elbow, and she fell on her side. She fractured her elbow and she has a fracture on her pelvic bone.”
Ladd remains hospitalized, unable to walk due to her broken pelvic bone, James says. When she was hospitalized, the hospital contacted Princeton Township Animal Control Officer Mark Johnson, who went to the hospital, where he questioned Guy James, James says.
“I can just tell in his eyes that he was going to do what he can to put these dogs down,” James said of Johnson.
Instead, the Jameses had all four dogs euthanized by the family’s veterinarian yesterday morning, James says. Put down were Congo and his mate, Lucia, both 3-and-a-half years old, and Shadow and Hunter, both age 2.
Johnson had ordered that Congo be euthanized last year after he and the three other dogs involved in Tuesday’s incident attacked two family landscapers. In that instance, Jameses argued that Congo was rightfully defending Elizabeth James, thinking the landscapers were attacking her. The more seriously injured of the two men attacked received a $250,000 insurance settlement from the family.
Congo's death sentence was upheld by a Princeton Township judge, but the Jameses appealed and a settlement reached in April spared the dog's life.
Guy James insisted his dogs again did nothing wrong in this latest incident.
“I can assure you this was not an attack,” he said.
James says he and his wife are convinced, however, that the dogs would again be ordered impounded by Johnson for an extended period, as they were after last year’s incident. James says Johnson would again have sought a death sentence to resolve this latest matter.
Johnson did not return a voice mail left by Pet Pulse seeking comment. He told the Trenton Times, however, that he would not have ordered the dogs euthanized this time.
"We couldn't prove which one had done the biting, so we would not have pushed for a vicious dog label," Johnson said. He says he maintains his belief that the original decision to euthanize Congo should never have been rescinded through a settlement between the Jameses and the Mercer County Prosecutor's Office.
"I prayed to God that (another dog attack involving Congo) never would happen, but in the back of my mind I knew it would," Johnson the Trenton Times. "It was just a matter of time."
Guy James says he does not believe Johnson's claim.
“If Mark Johnson was not involved in this whole thing I would have not put them down,” James said. “Our decision was based on really that Mark was going to come take the dogs and have them locked up for, God knows how long -- six months, eight months, however long it may be.
“And the final outcome would ultimately have been going (to be put) down. Honestly, I wasn’t going to do that to my dogs.
“So we figured we’d do the most humane thing we possibly could. And rather than them suffering through the next six to eight months in a shelter, and then be put down later, then we decided that we will put them down and we will do it ourselves.”
The dogs were euthanized yesterday morning, taken to the vet at 5:30 a.m. to have them put down before Johnson ordered their death, James says.
James says the rationale behind that decision was, “At least we’ll be there with them, so they don’t have to go through the whole ordeal, and we don’t have to go through the whole ordeal."
Congo’s plight last year sparked global media attention and support world-wide from animal lovers, including a protest outside the township's Municipal Court featuring chants of "Free Congo!" The Jameses say they received thousands of e-mails from people wanting Congo’s life spared.
As a result of the case, Union County Assemblyman Neil Cohen wrote a bill called “Congo’s Law,” aimed at making it tougher for dogs to be euthanized after a biting incident. It would also enable dogs to remain free, instead of being impounded, pending legal proceedings involving them.
The bill was passed by the State Assembly but was rejected by the State Senate. Until this latest incident, the Jameses said they planned to continue promoting the need for Congo's Law. They also spoke of starting a foundation to raise money to provide legal expenses and boarding fees for those whose dogs are involved in situations similar to Congo's initial case.
James says he has spoken with Cohen since this latest incident.
“After I explained to him what happened he really understood,” James said.
Since news of the dogs’ death surfaced, the Jameses have gotten many e-mails from sympathetic supporters, though Guy James is also aware of negative feedback that has appeared on the Internet, he says.
Asked what he would tell the throngs of people who have supported Congo and Congo’s Law, James said, “Nothing’s changed. Nothing’s changed about people’s support, and shouldn’t change people’s feelings supporting Congo in the past because he didn’t do anything wrong.
“He didn’t do anything wrong and none of the puppies did anything wrong. We appreciate all the support that we had in the first situation, and this should not at all change people’s minds as to their efforts from the first situation.”
Just recently, Congo, Lucia, Shadow and Hunter were playing ball in the family backyard with a large group of people, James says.
Now they are all gone.
“Probably one of the worst things, the hardest, hardest things that I could ever have to deal with, except for possibly losing a family member,” James said.
Tell us what you think about “Congo Shocker: Owner Puts Down Freed Death Row Dog” below. Share your favorite videos by clicking on the ZootooTV tab. Send us your story ideas by e-mailing us at news@zootoo.com or by calling us at 877-777-4204.

Comments
Page 1 of 3
Next3 days ago
Reply
1 week ago
Reply
2 weeks ago
Reply
2 weeks ago
Reply
3 days ago
Reply
3 weeks ago
Reply
4 weeks ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
After spending all of that money on attorney's fees and enduring so much heartache in the last few months, the decision to put these animals down does not make sense.
2 months ago
Reply
2 months ago
Reply
2 months ago
Reply
2 months ago
Reply
2 months ago
Reply
2 months ago
Reply
2 months ago
Reply
2 months ago
Reply
2 months ago
Reply
2 months ago
Reply
2 months ago
Reply
2 months ago
Reply
2 months ago
Reply
2 months ago
Reply
2 months ago
Reply
The sickening saga of Guy and Elizabeth James and their pack of five vicious German Shepherd dogs exemplify the horrifying and horrific results when misguided, fanatical special interest groups are allowed to manipulate, dictate our public safety policies.
After Congo's first vicious, unprovoked attack on an innocent landscaper, lower court Judge Russell Annich correctly ruled that Congo must be euthanized. This raised the ire, wrath and fury of special interest pet hobbyist and lobbyist into an irrational, illogical tirade to "save" Congo. They insisted Congo was inherently a good, loveable, "lick you to death" family member.
The James' children publicly cried - playing to the audience like a fine tuned fiddle. Animal lovers mourned Congo's fate. NJ Assemblyman, Neil Cohen, promptly came to rescue Congo with a revised (watered down) vicious dog law in hand - complete with photo ops! Cohen decried NJ's vicious dog law as unfair - it must be changed - dogs have "rights" he naively and foolishly demanded. Congo was just "protecting his family" was his mantra.
Almost a year later, Congo attacked again. This time, instead of "protecting his family" he attacked and mauled a family member. Not surprisingly, the vocal special interest groups that harassed, maligned and abused our justice system to "save" Congo remain eerily silent! They're praying this story won't awaken public safety advocates.
Every aspect of this second attack and the subsequent actions by the Jameses are suspect, worrisome, troubling and perhaps felonious.
The Jameses should have had their dogs muzzled, restrained and supervised whenever they were out of their mandated enclosure on the fenced property. It appears this was not the case. Violating this statue is a chargeable offense. If these dogs were to escape the yard, a neighborhood child could have easily been mauled or killed.
When a potentially dangerous dog attacks again, the owner must notify animal control. According to reports, this did not happen. This is another serious violation and chargeable offense. According to reports, the Jameses even refused to cooperate with authorities conducting an investigation of the attack.
Knowingly and willfully violating court orders, state statutes, obstructing justice, obstructing an investigation or destroying evidence and conspiracy are all very serious crimes that have serious criminal consequences.
The saga of the arrogant, scofflaw James family must not end here. The public listened to their outrageous rants and convoluted and misleading diatribes to "save" vicious Congo for over six months - while neighbors were forced to live in fear of another attack. Now, we are not only witnessing another display of conceit and deception by the Jameses but also their flagrant and diabolical disrespect for our laws, courts and public safety.
The duty of a public prosecutor is to seek justice, enforce criminal laws and work for the victims of crime. The dog attack victim is not the only victim here. The public - especially children - are also victims in this case.
The Mercer County prosecutor's office must launch a full and thorough investigation of this incident. No stone should go unturned. If any evidence is found that the james broke the law they must spend the maximum time allowable under the law in jail for their reckless, perilous and contemptuous behavior.
Judge Annich must quickly issue an order prohibiting the Jameses from ever owning or harboring any animals on their property. As it stands, there is nothing to prevent the irresponsible and dangerous James family from acquiring five more vicious dogs!
1 month ago
Reply
1. came to the property early
2. came into the property when they had been told to wait
3. Hit the puppies with a shovel so of course the parents came running
4. Screamed and threatened the dogs
5. Grabbed one of the owners for "safety" scaring her at the same time so she screamed(so the dogs thought that the worker was attacking her)
If that ever happened to me I hope my dog would try to help me/defend me! You sound ridiculously cruel and bitter in this comment. You personally attack the family; even the children!!! Are you suggesting their tears weren't genuine/real or are you suggesting that they should not have been allowed to show any emotion that a family pet was sentenced to death? If that's the case then you should be ashamed of yourself. Get your facts straight the article states that there was no malicious intent when the dogs jumped up on grandma. When people age they become more vulnerable to injury, in case you didn't know that already. As for jail time for these individuals it is the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard! Well let's hope that the children don't cry this time "playing to the audience like a fine tuned fiddle" (your quote, not mine).
1 month ago
Reply
2 months ago
Reply
2 months ago
Reply
2 months ago
Reply
It's sad for the dogs, who had no idea that their behavior was incorrect. They lost their lives because they were born into or purchased by owners who clearly had no idea what they were doing.
I can only hope that they decide not to get any more pets!
2 months ago
Reply
2 months ago
Reply
2 months ago
Reply
2 months ago
Reply
2 months ago
Reply
I also think its bad taste to make light of this news article with such comments and smily faces, if we can't discuss this intelligently then we need not comment at all. Everyone is allowed their opinion but lets not forget these dogs lost their lives due to simple human stupidity.
2 months ago
Reply
2 months ago
Reply
2 months ago
Reply
2 months ago
Reply
2 months ago
Reply
2 months ago
Reply
2 months ago
Reply
2 months ago
Reply
2 months ago
Reply
If we really do have the whole story of "the dogs jumped and scratched the lady" and that was all, then the dogs could not have been put down. And the proof would be in the "show me the bite mark".
And if they were so worried about a long trial and the dogs in kennels for a long time, if they really were in the wrong, then yes, put them down. But not for jumping and not being trained.
I also hope that any remaining dogs are taken away before he does sometime stupid to them. The other stories states 2 adults and 4 pups. So where were the other two dogs.
Also I do not believe Guy James and Family to be "for the animals" based on this story. I can not truly believe that he would have put them down because they jumped on somebody. Yes, the lady got hurt. But he should have already been working on preventing something like this with training.
What a complete loser.
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
True, they made mistakes. Sometimes people make poor and often rash decisions when they are weary and tired.
1 month ago
Reply
2 months ago
Reply
2 months ago
Reply
2 months ago
Reply
2 months ago
Reply
2 months ago
Reply
2 months ago
Reply
2 months ago
Reply
2 months ago
Reply
2 months ago
Reply
I am just beside myself and cannot understand why they would think this would be a humane solution to their problem. I feel for their loss but think it was totally unnecessary to do this.