zootoo.com
discover by
pet type

Birmingham Animal Control Faces Controversy

Browse News

BIRMINGHAM, Ala. – An animal control facility that’s paid for by the city of Birmingham and Jefferson County has come under fire in recent weeks over its role in the city, which it contends is to protect people from animals.

Local animal shelter workers want to see procedural changes pertaining to adoptions and the organization’s for-profit status.

It’s like any other shelter, filled nearly to the brim with all types of animals; of course most of them are dogs and cats.

But the Birmingham Jefferson Animal Control Service shelter operates by a different mantra than you might think.

“The purpose of any animal control program is to protect the public from nuisance animals, dangerous, diseased animals, that sort of thing,” said BJACS President Steve Smith. “The purpose of any humane organization is just the opposite. They’re there to protect pets from people.”

His opinion is not shared by shelter and rescue groups in the area. Specifically, rescue worker Jana Maynard who helps find forever homes through 2-by-2 Animal Rescue.

“My biggest concern of the BJC shelter is it is a for profit shelter and any time something is for profit, it is about making money and when you are trying to make money you’re putting that in front of the well-being of the animals coming through,” said Maynard.

But Smith contends that notions like Maynard’s are a misinterpretation of his program’s role.

“There’s just a misunderstanding,” he said. “A lot of people don’t know the difference between a humane society and an animal control program. And they expect control programs to operate like a humane society.”

Smith said the animals his group takes in are different from those taken in by humane societies.

“We get animals that are neglected, abused, abandoned, they’re sick, injured, they’re in every possible condition you can imagine, as to where most animals in a humane shelter are brought in sitting beside somebody in a car,” he said.

According to Smith, only five percent of the animals brought to his facility have any identification, and only half are adoptable.

“(There’s) no rabies tag, no ID tag, so that puts us at a severe handicap as far as getting it back to the owner,” he said.

As for the un-adoptable animals, “they’re sick, injured or they’re aggressive,” he explained.

Still, Maynard said she’d like to see improvements in the area of adoptions. Currently, only one employee is responsible for those services, and if she isn’t there no animals can be adopted.

“Whereas maybe another shelter or rescue would take more time with an animal, trying to find its home or owner, they’re trying to make money however they can with these animals,” Maynard said, also equating the shelter to a clearing house for animals.

“I would love to see their hours be increased and their adoption days increased,” Maynard said. “I would love to see them make an effort to update their facility so they have rooms where people could come in and meet the animals.”

But Smith said if there was a need for someone to be available during every hour the shelter was open, they’d hire someone.

“It’s just that there aren’t enough people that are interested in adopting a shelter pet,” said Smith. “We wish we didn’t have to euthanize a single animal.”

With a $1 million budget each year provided by the city and county, finances aren’t as big a problem as they are for other animal groups; they’re not rolling in excess cash either.

And, as Smith explained, the shelter has weekly TV and radio advertisements, a mobile adoption unit and low cost spay-neuter programs, all in the name of easing the adoption process for potential pet owners.

Still, the issue of how city and county run animal control facilities should be run – at least in Birmingham – centers on protecting people first. State law mandates that every city provide this service, so for now BJACS has its hands tied.

Mayor Larry Langford gave his opinion on the subject.

“Look, I’m a pet owner and I’m a pet lover,” he said. “But the fact of the matter is someone is going to have to be paid to maintain and operate this. Now if these groups are interested in doing it free, then bring them all together and let’s see how interested they really are.”

If you’d like to comment and see what others have to say, go to the news section of zootoo.com. Send us story ideas by e-mailing or calling us.

Matt Van Hoven is a reporter/editor for Pet Pulse on ZootooTV. He can be reached at news@zootoo.com or 201-210-5452, ext. 1019.



Tags


How do you like this article?

60%, 25 out of 41 users thumbed up.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down

Discuss this topic

Comments


977 comments found.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 17 Showing page of 17 Go
 
Katie M.
Katie M. (katielynn7)
4 months ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Everyone needs to work together
 
Erin H.
Erin H. (browniejoe2)
8 months ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Yes they should be able to work together but they are two different organizations and maybe some people don't understand that and they should be more informed.
 
barb  a.
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Humane society and animal control are two different organizations but they can work together
 
Cindy R.
Cindy R. (crzyblu)
8 months ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Everyone needs to work together.
 
jbobstep
jbobstep
8 months ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Local governments every where should be willing to work with rescue organizations.
 
Ethan W.
Ethan W. (wooday0691)
8 months ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Seems obvious there would be a difference. One serves the public, one serves pets.
 
Betty W.
Betty W. (BettyWood)
8 months ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
There's truth to his point that Animal Control is not the same thing as a Shelter. They get everything brought to them. They are not and can not be no kill shleters. The no-kill shleters could offer to take the healthy animals that are overloading the Animal control facility.
 
Geoff L.
Geoff L. (glcats)
9 months ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
There really is a lot of confusion about the animal welfare field.
 
L.H.S.
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
“A lot of people don’t know the difference between a humane society and an animal control program. And they expect control programs to operate like a humane society.”

Exactly. We are co-located next to our County Animal Control Office which is a kill facility. We are a no-kill facility and many people get the two organizations confused.
 
stewman
stewman
9 months ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Whatever will help the most animals is what we should strive for. Whether it is for profit or not is not important, but you really can see the difference, at least in Southwestern Connecticut. The not for profit, or volunteer shelters are way above the cith run pounds. The solution is for more people to volunteer.
 
Ann G.
Ann G. (amgfnyc)
9 months ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
The whole issue of animal control vs. animal shelter is very complicated, but I think that no matter what you call yourself, you can try to do as much as you possibly can to help the animals get adopted into homes.
 
debby r.
debby r. (debbyrich)
9 months ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I feel sorry for the animals, they deserve a chance. I hope the people demand a change.
 
Sherri R.
Sherri R. (sherri1019)
9 months ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
This AC should try and partner with some area shelters or rescues to help place at least some of these pets.
 
Ralph M.
Ralph M. (Ralph1)
9 months ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Animal Control kills countless dogs and cats each day. Very few of them are a danger to people. A better way would be to hand them over to a shelter after the 7 - 10 days is up so they can find homes.
 
bonzosmom
bonzosmom
9 months ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
This is a sad situation and the people of Birmingham will need to demand a change.
 
L.H.S.
Flag this | Good Point | 1 user liked it.
Reply
The Mayor has a very valid point. The Animal Control facility is there by law and it does it's job by law. The people who do not like it have two three choices. They can lobby to change the law, they can start a non-profit, no kill, rescue shelter and pull from the animal control office, or they continue to continue to sit back and complain. Only two of the three choices will bring change for the good of the animals.
 
Meryl O.
Meryl O. (OnealMeryl)
9 months ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
You hit the nail right on the head, Dawn!
 
DEREKDEMANE
DEREKDEMANE
9 months ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Mr Smith is clearly in it for the money. I feel so sorry for the animals at that facility.
 
DEREKDEMANE
DEREKDEMANE
9 months ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I like to clarify and add on to what I just wrote. Sound to me like Mr. Smith is talking out his a$$!
 
Andy K.
Andy K. (Krochalk)
11 months ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Like DDRau, I'm turned off by the tone of the us vs. them argument provided by Mr Smith. Part of an effective animal control program would seem to be getting animals into good homes. There is a lot of common ground and if the animal control facility is funded by citizen tax dollars he should realize the public's opinion of how he runs the facility is very important.
 
Meg S.
Meg S. (drambuie)
11 months ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Animal control and humane shelter is and should be one in the same. And to say that becuase a facility is for profit or not for profit would alter how it operates is hopefully not true. If it was true than the facility is not doing a good job.
Let's face it....for profit or not for profit...it is still a business that in order to keep operating must meet it's financial obligations.
 
Sarah  W.
Sarah W. (Roxymimi)
11 months ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Hmm, Interesting controversy.
 
DDRau
DDRau
11 months ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I think a quote like this just hits most people the wrong way: “The purpose of any animal control program is to protect the public from nuisance animals, dangerous, diseased animals, that sort of thing,” said BJACS President Steve Smith. “The purpose of any humane organization is just the opposite. They’re there to protect pets from people" This guy is pitting "us" against "them" when most want to seek common ground.
 
VKiggins
VKiggins
11 months ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Humane treatment of animals should not even be questioned in any facility....an animal control facility or humane society should be one in the same...housing, protecting, and treating animals in need.
 
lindsey c.
lindsey c. (SnushKid)
11 months ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Honestly, it IS a common problem.. other people cleaning up after someone else destroys/mistreats an animal.. at least they are trying to improve the situation.
 
Kate H.
Kate H. (dixiepets)
11 months ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
This is more common then people think
 
Morgan
Morgan (kcovey)
1 year ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
We don't live in a perfect society so these groups are needed to take over when irresponsible owners emerge
 
Nancy  H.
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
As they exist now, I think animal control facilities and humane societies have very different purposes. I wish the two could merge and lean in the way of humane societies. I wish that more people would step up and adopt animals and that we could make spaying and neutering a way of life. Then maybe we wouldn't have so many animals without homes.
 
Cindy W.
Cindy W. (cindy420)
1 year ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
something is terriable wrong with this picture
 
Christine H.
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I think a lot of this could be prevented simply by keeping collars and ID tags on your pets. That way, a lot of the pets would not even have to be near that place. Most people will try to return lost animals to their owners.
 
Sharon S.
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I don't agree with his reasoning. Sure he should be protecting the public from dangerous animals. But he should also be protecting the homeless and abused animals. They should be given more of a chance for adoption. A shelter should not be a for-profit entity. That's where the problem lies.
 
L.H.S.
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
The problem lies in that people do not understand that an animal control facility is not a shelter. It is a government office run by governmental laws established by the people by their representatives. It is unfortunate that, in this case, people are pointing fingers rather trying to find a middle ground solution.
 
Connie G.
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
It sounds like he doesn't want to take the time to learn how to be a real shelter. It's easier just to keep doing what hes doing even if it's not the best thing to do. I hope he gets a lot of pressure to change.
 
Norma B.
Norma B. (Norma123)
1 year ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply

The goal should be to protect the peopl and help the animals at the same time. Other local goverments do this - so can this one!
 
Michelle G.
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Obviously something is really messed up here. Helping BOTH animals and people would be best!!
 
Karen M.
Karen M. (Karemel)
1 year ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I think this guy has issues. Maybe let someone else take over while he goes away to figure them out.
 
Michelle H.
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
They should be concerned with protecting people and animals.
 
Sue R.
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
What kind of screwed up logic is going on here. Protecting the people from animals. Humane Societies only get those animals that are sitting by a care somewhere - not the injured, abused or ill. In what parallel universe are these people living in? Again, the major concern is making a profit - the business of business. Let's hope this guy doesn't get put in charge of a hospital or nursing home anytime soon. Humane societies and animal control work hand in hand - not on the opposite sides of the spectrum. Who is this person related to that they got this job?
 
andrew22
andrew22
1 year ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Unfortunately everything always comes down to money.
 
Kim
Kim (norswl1)
1 year ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
too bad there does not appear to be a good middle ground............
 
Janie
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
This is sure a double edged sword. Not sure what the answer to this is.
 
Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
This comment has been removed.
 
Jeanie F.
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Most animals who are sick, abused, or neglected make wonderful pets when they find an owner who cares for them.
 
martin s.
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
that is brutal
 
Ashlee S.
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
sad story
 
amy
amy (amycbh)
1 year ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Animal contol is important but so is caring for neglected animals.
 
Ashton B.
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
that's sad
 
Kris
Kris (tenlivesclub)
1 year ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Just because animals have been neglected, abused, abandoned, sick, or injured does not mean they are not adoptable. These animals need a another chance at life!
 
rszink77
rszink77
1 year ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
sad
 
Melanie V.
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I found this to be rather sad. I hate the thought of all those animals out there who have no one to love them! Like if my little kitty wasn't being loved, it would be so sad. If I had my own house, I would have a farmhouse of cats!
 
mARY ANN M.
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
So let me understand this. The City pays a group to run an animal control facility and in order to make money that control facility cut back on staff and means to adopt out adoptable animals but wants to find a way to make other local non profit shelters accept those animals so they can continue to make profits.

I do not find such a clear cut difference between animal control and shelter work. Yes, you have to delineate between animals that can be saved and adopted out and those that can not...a very hard thing to do. But to have only one staff member and few resources for adoption and control in the interest of cost cutting tells me the City should be looking into running the facility itself, taking the overhead and profit that company is taking and putting it into the services that are being cut in the name of profit.

Some things really should not be privatized.
 
L.H.S.
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
It is hard to understand because it is the non-profit organizations calling the animal control office a for profit organization. However, the very start of the article tells us that this is funded by the local government, most likely and legally, by the lowest bidding contractor. Not sure how this can be considered a "profit organization". They are under a specific contract as to the amount of money they are paid per year.

Indeed, they would make more money adopting out animals than euthanizing them if the truth was being fully told here.
 
Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago
This comment has been removed.
 
scoobs
scoobs
1 year ago
Flag this | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
wow
Zootoo pet news videos
A Voice for The Animals

A Voice for The Animals

If you are interested in donating to North Shore Animal League visit NSALAmerica.org.

A Diamond in The Valley

A Diamond in The Valley

"The Valley" has always been known for top of the line shopping, spas, and more... But now, you can share the best of the best with your pet.

New Developments in Pet Cancer Treatment

New Developments in Pet Cancer Treatment

Animal Cancer Foundation founder, Dr. Gerald S. Post, informs K9 in the City on the new breakthroughs in animal cancer treatment. There are more effec…

Fashion For all Dog Kind

Fashion For all Dog Kind

You may not dress your dog up every time you leave your house or perhaps you and "Tinker Bell" enjoy wearing the latest fashions together. Regardless,…

The Softer Side of Howard Stern

The Softer Side of Howard Stern

With the capacity to shelter 300 animals at any given time, North Shore Animal League is known to be the “largest no-kill animal rescue” in Americ…

Is Animal Cancer Treatable?

Is Animal Cancer Treatable?

In Brooklyn, Dr. Post, a veterinary oncologist explains that animal cancer is treatable but since cancer is the most common cause for death in older …

Some Run for The Gold; He Runs for The Goal

Some Run for The Gold; He Runs for The Goal

You may remember the New York City Marathon runner, Brayden Mathews, who ran to raise money for United Action for Animals, a long time promoter of the…

True Blue Yankees Fans

True Blue Yankees Fans

The New York Yankees celebrated their 27th victory in the MLB World Series. Devoted fans gathered in Manhattan's financial district on November 6th,…

A Whole Art Gallery, Gone to the Dogs?

A Whole Art Gallery, Gone to the Dogs?

Have you ever wondered what the world looked like to a dog? Well what if "Spot" could draw a picture for you? In New York's neighborhood of Chelsea, t…

Meet Munch: Star of Iams

Meet Munch: Star of Iams' 'Beautiful on the Inside' Ad

Big conventions can be great places to hobnob with celebrities, and the Meet The Breeds event at the Jacob Javits Convention Center in New York City w…


View all

News Archive