
March 5, 2008
BIRMINGHAM, Ala. – An animal control facility that’s paid for by the city of Birmingham and Jefferson County has come under fire in recent weeks over its role in the city, which it contends is to protect people from animals.
Local animal shelter workers want to see procedural changes pertaining to adoptions and the organization’s for-profit status.
It’s like any other shelter, filled nearly to the brim with all types of animals; of course most of them are dogs and cats.
But the Birmingham Jefferson Animal Control Service shelter operates by a different mantra than you might think.
“The purpose of any animal control program is to protect the public from nuisance animals, dangerous, diseased animals, that sort of thing,” said BJACS President Steve Smith. “The purpose of any humane organization is just the opposite. They’re there to protect pets from people.”
His opinion is not shared by shelter and rescue groups in the area. Specifically, rescue worker Jana Maynard who helps find forever homes through 2-by-2 Animal Rescue.
“My biggest concern of the BJC shelter is it is a for profit shelter and any time something is for profit, it is about making money and when you are trying to make money you’re putting that in front of the well-being of the animals coming through,” said Maynard.
But Smith contends that notions like Maynard’s are a misinterpretation of his program’s role.
“There’s just a misunderstanding,” he said. “A lot of people don’t know the difference between a humane society and an animal control program. And they expect control programs to operate like a humane society.”
Smith said the animals his group takes in are different from those taken in by humane societies.
“We get animals that are neglected, abused, abandoned, they’re sick, injured, they’re in every possible condition you can imagine, as to where most animals in a humane shelter are brought in sitting beside somebody in a car,” he said.
According to Smith, only five percent of the animals brought to his facility have any identification, and only half are adoptable.
“(There’s) no rabies tag, no ID tag, so that puts us at a severe handicap as far as getting it back to the owner,” he said.
As for the un-adoptable animals, “they’re sick, injured or they’re aggressive,” he explained.
Still, Maynard said she’d like to see improvements in the area of adoptions. Currently, only one employee is responsible for those services, and if she isn’t there no animals can be adopted.
“Whereas maybe another shelter or rescue would take more time with an animal, trying to find its home or owner, they’re trying to make money however they can with these animals,” Maynard said, also equating the shelter to a clearing house for animals.
“I would love to see their hours be increased and their adoption days increased,” Maynard said. “I would love to see them make an effort to update their facility so they have rooms where people could come in and meet the animals.”
But Smith said if there was a need for someone to be available during every hour the shelter was open, they’d hire someone.
“It’s just that there aren’t enough people that are interested in adopting a shelter pet,” said Smith. “We wish we didn’t have to euthanize a single animal.”
With a $1 million budget each year provided by the city and county, finances aren’t as big a problem as they are for other animal groups; they’re not rolling in excess cash either.
And, as Smith explained, the shelter has weekly TV and radio advertisements, a mobile adoption unit and low cost spay-neuter programs, all in the name of easing the adoption process for potential pet owners.
Still, the issue of how city and county run animal control facilities should be run – at least in Birmingham – centers on protecting people first. State law mandates that every city provide this service, so for now BJACS has its hands tied.
Mayor Larry Langford gave his opinion on the subject.
“Look, I’m a pet owner and I’m a pet lover,” he said. “But the fact of the matter is someone is going to have to be paid to maintain and operate this. Now if these groups are interested in doing it free, then bring them all together and let’s see how interested they really are.”
If you’d like to comment and see what others have to say, go to the news section of zootoo.com. Send us story ideas by e-mailing or calling us.
Matt Van Hoven is a reporter/editor for Pet Pulse on ZootooTV. He can be reached at news@zootoo.com or 201-210-5452, ext. 1019.
Cockfighting Ring Busted, 25 Birds Found
PHILADELPHIA -- Animal cruelty offi...
U.S. Rabies Warning Linked to Baghdad Pups
SECAUCUS, N.J. -– The Center for D...
Mushrooms Turn Dogs' Backyards Deadly
CHARLOTTE, N.C. -- Toxic mushrooms h...
Community Comes Together for Kidnapped Goat
KINGS PARK, N.Y. -- The traumatic de...
Pa. Puppy Mill Busted, 800 Animals to be Freed
EMMAUS, Pa. -– At least 52 animal...

Comments
Page 1 of 17
Next5 months ago
Reply
6 months ago
Reply
6 months ago
Reply
6 months ago
Reply
6 months ago
Reply
6 months ago
Reply
6 months ago
Reply
The goal should be to protect the peopl and help the animals at the same time. Other local goverments do this - so can this one!
6 months ago
Reply
6 months ago
Reply
6 months ago
Reply
6 months ago
Reply
6 months ago
Reply
6 months ago
Reply
6 months ago
Reply
6 months ago
Reply
6 months ago
Reply
6 months ago
Reply
6 months ago
Reply
6 months ago
Reply
6 months ago
Reply
6 months ago
Reply
6 months ago
Reply
6 months ago
Reply
6 months ago
Reply
I do not find such a clear cut difference between animal control and shelter work. Yes, you have to delineate between animals that can be saved and adopted out and those that can not...a very hard thing to do. But to have only one staff member and few resources for adoption and control in the interest of cost cutting tells me the City should be looking into running the facility itself, taking the overhead and profit that company is taking and putting it into the services that are being cut in the name of profit.
Some things really should not be privatized.
6 months ago
Reply
6 months ago
Reply
6 months ago
Reply
6 months ago
Reply
6 months ago
Reply
6 months ago
Reply
6 months ago
Reply
It has to revolve around money.
6 months ago
Reply
6 months ago
Reply
6 months ago
Reply
6 months ago
Reply
6 months ago
Reply
6 months ago
Reply
Man himself, would perhaps have not survived the many travails he faced, nor the threats to his existence, were it not for his evolving relationship with the wolf, who would ultimately become the dog. The bond between the two was one of both convenience and necessity, providing both with the rewards of social networking or "packing". Man was fairly adept at hunting prey and leaving significant remnants or leftovers, which were easy pickings for the wolf. The wolf’s keen sense of sight, smell, and sound provided vital protection and security alerting man to marauders or dangerous predators. It was by all accounts, a relationship based upon mutual respect and admiration for the skills each possessed.
As man evolved, so too did his needs, and the wolf or dog, became more and more specialized at providing necessary skill sets such as hunting, herding, retrieving, security, etc. Equal to the evolution of man's survival and subsistence needs were his social needs; some of those needs were positive, and some were not so, at least for some. The pleasure of dog companionship apart from merely a working relationship began to develop as a significant aspect for many due to the simple, unconditional, and selfless loyalty the canine is famous for.
As pack animals, canines understood well (due to their descendency from the wolf), the importance of social networking and bonding based upon a hierarchy grounded in trust, stability, mutual respect, and undying loyalty to the pack, or family. They also understood the importance of reinforcing those bonds continually through demonstrations of loyalty, affection, and respect. Thus we began to bond ever more with the canine.
There are however, those among us who have simply never understood the significant role the canine has played in our survival and evolution, or the importance of their social networking which serves as a testament to their enduring legacy as pack animals. It is beyond remarkable to watch a pack of canines interact with one another, creating a network with a hierarchy based up balance, survival, stability, and above all else, longevity of the pack. There are no lies, no deception, no misinformation, and no selfishness practiced nor allowed within the pack, as its very existence is dependent upon stability and balance.
All decisions made by the pack leaders (Alpha male and Alpha female) must be made with the best interests of all pack members in mind or the pack will quickly turn on its leaders and replace them. The pack cannot survive with unstable or selfish pack leaders and that system has allowed canine packs to evolve and survive some of the harshest conditions on earth. It has also allowed them to adapt their skill sets to various needs and demands and equally has allowed them to work closely and affectionately with man as a pack member.
What an incredible gift and responsibility they have entrusted us with, their very souls and lives; and all too often, we betray that trust. How very disheartening a thought that is. I am a firm believer that a human being who does not respect an animal, particularly one who has been so instrumental to our survival, is truly a human being who does not, despite any appearance to the contrary, respect human beings as a whole either.
Someone once told me, "if your dog doesn't like somebody, maybe you shouldn't either".
6 months ago
Reply
6 months ago
Reply
6 months ago
Reply
6 months ago
Reply
6 months ago
Reply
Yes, I know the difference and yes I do expect them to operate the same. Anything else is neglectful, abusive and sheer laziness.
6 months ago
Reply
6 months ago
Reply
6 months ago
Reply
could cut down on the population?
6 months ago
Reply
6 months ago
Reply
6 months ago
Reply
6 months ago
Reply
6 months ago
Reply
6 months ago
Reply
6 months ago
Reply
Page 1 of 17
Next