Big Apple Protesters Fight for Feral Cats at Airport

Browse News

NEW YORK -- Demonstrators were outside the Port Authority headquarters last week, angry at how authorities were handling the issue of hundreds of feral cats living on the grounds of John F. Kennedy Airport.

The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey manages JFK Airport.

“The Humane Society and other rescue groups are baffled that the Port Authority and JFK suddenly said cats posed a problem, because they have been there for decades,” Patrick Kwan, New York state director of the Humane Society of the United States.

“There has never been an instance of a plane being brought down by a cat in the airport,” Kwan added.

Cats have not posed a significant problem to airplanes at Kennedy or any other airport nationwide, according to the Federal Aviation Administration. Of the 80,000 reported incidents of animals striking planes that have been studied for the past 18 years, less than one percent were cat related.

“In each of the 14 cases that were identified in our database there was no damage to the aircraft or any type of injuries associated to the event,” said Michael Brown, manager of Airport Safety at the FAA.

Of the estimated 300 to 500 cats and kittens living at Kennedy Airport, cat advocates say that no cats have been reported near the runway.

“The cats are the descendents of lost pets that have gone on to spawn a new generation,” said Valerie Sicignano, director of the New York City Feral Cat Initiative.

“For decades, many of the airport employees have been caring for the cats,” Kwan said. “Some have been working on programs to trap, neuter and return.”

Trap, neuter and return, also known as TNR, is considered the most humane approach in dealing with feral cats, unlike the airport’s current strategy of exterminating them altogether.

“They hired an exterminator in May to round up the cats, and a few months ago they promised us a ban on trapping, but they went back on their word,” Sicignano said.

“The humane society is asking for the Port Authority and JFK to work with local humane groups to implement a trap neuter return program,” Kwan said. “It is a proven method and the only recognized humane method for feral cat population control.”

A spokesperson for the Port Authority declined comment, saying any comment they have made in the past has been misinterpreted.

“With all due respect, I think they presented some very disingenuous arguments at the beginning, that it was about security, and that the food for the cats was attracting seagulls,” said Michael Phillips, president of the Urban Cat League.

“There are seagulls at JFK because JFK is on the sea. A few dishes of cat food is not driving seagulls into the carbines of engines.”

The cat advocates’ efforts may finally pay off. Officials at a recent Port Authority public board meeting were heard saying “If they have a pilot program that is not going to cost the Port Authority any money, why don’t we at least try it?”

Tell us what you think about “Big Apple Protesters Fight for Feral Cats at Airport” below. Share your favorite videos by clicking on the ZootooTV tab. Send us your story ideas by e-mailing us at news@zootoo.com or by calling us at 877-777-4204.

Bookmark & Share: Newsvine Newsvine  Digg Digg  Del.icio.us Del.icio.us  Reddit Reddit


Tags


How do you like this article?

100%, 6 out of 6 users thumbed up.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down

Discuss this topic

Comments



61 comments found.
Show: 50 100 200 Per Page
 
B. E.
B. E. (Daytona43)
1 month ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
this is a terrible thing the way they went back on their word! they must spay neuter & return. KUDOS to all the folks over the years who have helped care for these precious creatures.
 
It makes me sad to think of innocent kitties being "exterminated" when there is such a more humane way to deal with the problem.
 
Sydney  S.
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I hope that they choose the TNR way. That is how my town handles our feral cat problem. It really is the only way.
 
Jill
Jill (Jiller)
1 month ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Where I work, A major horse racing track, a lot of people come in and just dump their unwanted cats in the parking lot. They think they can live off the mice in the barns. For a number of years we had a TNR program in effect and it worked wonderfully, our population was controlled and everyone was happy. Then we got new management whose decision it was to trap all the cats, even rumors they were shooting them, and have them put to sleep. No matter who we contacted or how much noise we made they managed to trap most of them and get rid of them. It is a sad state of affairs now, because the people involved with the TNR were warned not to feed the cats or TNR any longer or they would be removed from the grounds. Now the population has exploded again and more cats are being trapped and taken to be put to sleep. If they had allowed the continuation of the TNR we wouldn't be having the problems we are today.
 
terrae01
terrae01
1 month ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
It only seems logical that TNR should be used in this case and that it would work.
 
californiabeagles
californiabeagles
1 month ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
While I agree that TNR is the most human approach and it is the one that I would prefer, it is not always the best option. Feral cats can have disastrous effects on natural fauna and the wellbeing of all animals should be taken into account in situations like this.
In this case, I think it seems odd that after decades of having feral cats, the authorities at JFK would suddenly decide to kill them all instead of first trying a less severe approach.
 
Sarah B.
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
TNR works & should be used in this case. When they are released they don't necessarily have to be released @ the airport even. Why kill them when they have other options.
 
Christine
Christine (kikgirl2)
1 month ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
People always look for an excuse for a problem, why blame cats that have been there for decades? Now I am all for the trap, neuter and return, that's 100% got my support, but other than that, leave them alone!!!! If they are not causing a problem then leave them be, there will always be some freak accident involving whatever, but that doesn't mean it's the ultimate problem.
 
Sandy F.
Sandy F. (jfbass)
1 month ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I cannot imagine that many cats there, but I think they should have done something years ago.
 
acedogg2001
acedogg2001
1 month ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I think people try to exterminate just because they don't like animals. As the reports show the cats have nothing to do with harming the airport. Tnr works just fine.
 
Mike H.
Mike H. (mphjan)
1 month ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I agree with TNR
 
Beth I.
Beth I. (MEBI38)
1 month ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I can't imagine how hard that orginazation worked to make the Port Authority listen to them. The dedication and efforts are very commendable
 
Julie
Julie (TTFifi)
1 month ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
exterminating all these cat because they create a security risk? come on. someone there doesn't like cat. At least give TNR a try.
 
Michele
Michele (MicheleZ)
1 month ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 1 user liked it.
Reply
Many of the opinions thus far seem to be concentrated on either advocating TNR or pointing out how expensive TNR would be at this point. I would support the former (a TNR effort) and seriously question if it would be as costly as some seem to think it would be.

Here are some points to consider:

(1) There are an estimated 300-500 feral cats at JFK airport;
(2) "The cats are descendents of lost pets"; and,
(3) The problem has existed for decades

Knowing what I know about cat reproduction, 300-500 feral cats after DECADES is actually quite SMALL! That would lead me to consider the possibility--or probability--that many of the "lost pets" were already spayed/neutered!!! If this is true, then a TRN initiative on the part of the airline might not be nearly as expensive as originally thought. Granted, at least some of the feral cats are reproducing, but it doesn't sound like they have reproduced at an alarming rate since the 300-500 population (after "decades") is, in perspective, VERY SMALL.

IF the JFK officials at least TRY the TRN option, they may find that it is a viable option that everyone (and every cat) can live with.

 
Michele
Michele (MicheleZ)
1 month ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I guess I should have mentioned that an alternative explanation for why the feral cat population at JFK has remained so low over the decades is that someone HAS been taking offensive measures to control the population (e.g., poison)!!
 
Corey A.
Corey A. (corey240)
1 month ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 1 user liked it.
Reply
I guess I have mixed feelings on the subject of feral cats. The number of feral cats seems to be a problem. Sure a few cats isn't that bad, but try thinking about the number of cats they are talking about. That is a lot of cat feces lying around that no one is picking up. Do the employees that feed the cats also clean up after them? Probably not, as most cat owners who let their cats roam can also attest to. It is someone else's problem. Would you be willing to pick up at least 500 piles of cat poop a day? I get annoyed picking up three piles a week from the cat hoarder that lives across the street with her dozen or so cats (many with kittens). It is so much more offensive than dog poop. Can you imagine how much poop is lying around with no one to clean it up? That in itself is a huge problem.

Also, cats spread disease, many of which are dangerous to young children, babies and pregnant women.

The solution in addition to the TNR is to stop feeding the cats, as that perpetuates the problem. The cats will move elsewhere to find food as they are very resourceful. It isn't like they are going to all die if no one feeds them. They will instead become someone else's problem.

Personally my neighbor irritates me, but we are trying very hard to get the traps from the shelter to trap and then take the cats in to the shelter. Here where I live, there is a long waiting list for the traps, at least 2 months. I have no problem with the TNR as her cats have no collars and obviously are not spayed/neutered.
 
I am with you on the poop thing! I hate it when my neighbors dog comes over & poops in my yard. One of us seem to always find it when it is on the bottom of our shoe! Dont get me wronge! I love Poo (ironically the dog's name),but i dont like his poop in my yard. As far as the cats are conserned, i like TNR re-release idea. i wonder if they could release some of them somewhere else though.
 
patty
patty (mikkizmom)
1 month ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
You discuss your "hoarder" neighbor and how unhappy the situation has made you but yet you suggest the cats become "someone else's problem". Obviously you are not happy that your neighbors cats have become your problem so why would you suggest this? Michelle is correct, they may already have a source of food in addition to what the airline staff may be providing. TNR is part of the solution, prosecuting when there are "drop offs" will also help to deter adding to the population.
 
Michele
Michele (MicheleZ)
1 month ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 2 users liked it.
Reply
Suggesting that the airline employees stop feeding the feral cats does NOT offer any longterm solution. What you are proposing is a displacement of the cats--"The cats will move elsewhere to find food... They will instead become someone else's problem." This may not be true since the cats may already have an ample supply of mice and other rodents in and around the airport area. Moreover, the airline officials are obligated to deal with THEIR own problem--and that would not entail merely passing it on to others who did not help create it. Sure, some officials are quick to "pass it on" and let others address the problem, but it is well overdue that they step up to the plate and resolve the problem.

In regards to the amount of cat feces left behind, there are also probably numerous other animals--like opossums and skunks or whatever--who serve as vacuum cleaners! (Besides, most cats "cover up" their own messes!)
 
Desiree A.
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I take it you're not a cat lover
 
ChicoianVolenteer
ChicoianVolenteer
1 month ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Should have dealt with this decades ago....
 
Janet V.
Janet V. (janeyv)
1 month ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Sounds to me like someone in authority doesn't like cats! People need to learn to live alongside God's creatures.
 
Beth  R.
Beth R. (BRiegert)
1 month ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
That is an overwhelming number. I am not confident that they can get all of them, but I would certainly like them make an effort for these cats.

You would think that more businesses would see that animals lovers protest when problems like this aren't handled humanely, and try to find a solution that makes everyone happy.
 
Michele
Michele (MicheleZ)
1 month ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 2 users liked it.
Reply
I think they waited way too long to address the issue. Had airport officials taken action decades ago, they would not be dealing with the magnitude of the problem today--or looking for a "quick cure" (e.g., extermination). Considering that "For decades, many of the airport employees have been caring for the cats", it is not fair to the cats--who were at least somewhat "invited" to stay--to now tell them they are no longer welcome and may be facing a death sentence. The airline CEOs (Cat Extermination Officers?) need to place the blame where it belongs: On allowing the problem to get out of hand--and THEY are responsible for it, not the cats. Therefore, they are obligated to take humane action at their own expense. I hope their CFO (Cat Financial Officer!) rejuggles the figures to come up enough money to do the right thing.

[Why don't the airline passengers who had their cats "go missing" on a flight to/from JFK have a good idea of where to look for their lost cats??]
 
Cheryl
Cheryl (cherries33)
1 month ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
You're right. They only had to lose a few cats decades ago to end up with this kind of problem.
 
Irineyuma
Irineyuma
1 month ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Ofcouse,in so situation only can to help ussing TNR.
I am surprise.It is the Port Authority first need to ask to use only TNR.
Becouse "To kill' do not work and can not to work.It is without sense,without mind,not clever and unhuman and cruel.
On this place will come another new cats,population will be grow and again this story will be repeat and repeat and repeat .But people which agree to kill cats or kill them only will lose theirself souls.
Only need to use TNR.
Fix cats will be protect their territory of the Port and no problem.
Number of the fix cats become quickly small becouse no kittens but poor cats outside do not live long time.This quistion would be close forever.
And the Port authority and all people around only will win if to use TNR.
 
Irineyuma
Irineyuma
1 month ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Only can and need to use THR-spay/neuter of all cats in the Airport.
But the Port Authority need to remind that they are too people and need to be more human with the lifes of the another alive around them.
THe Port Authority need to help that to sterilisate feral cats.

 
Brian D.
Brian D. (briannikki)
1 month ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Thats inhumane tnr them that way the population slowly goes down.
 
sharon d.
Flag this comment | Good Point | 1 user liked it.
Reply
This problem became a problem because no one tried to prevent it from happening to begin with.
Now that there are major Cat numbers,it's out of hand,so to speak.
It's not right to kill off cats just because they were placed in these situations,as they didn't have much say.
Okay,so there are a lot of cats,TNR is still the right thing to do to even begin to change the problem.You can kill them all off,but that only opens the doors for new animals to move in.
Someone wasn't being responsible pet owners and now countless cats are struggling to survive.They need our help,not a death sentence.It also comes up to make "dumping animals" a huge fine,adopting only spayed/neutered pets,etc.
We the people created this outrage,so it's up to us to help them.
Every time I turn around,I'm always hearing about so many stupid issues that our tax dollars are paying for.Let's get our priorities right,and start taking matters more seriously.There are free and low cost clinics all over.The Port Authority takes in tons of money and wastes tons.They should step up along with the City council and help come up with some funding.
This problem isn't going to disappear overnight.It was left to get completely out of control and now someone has to pay the consequences.Hopefully,it's not the poor defenseless cats.
 
Irineyuma
Irineyuma
1 month ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I agree with you, 3devinecats.
 
Irineyuma
Irineyuma
1 month ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I agree with you 3devinecats.
The Port Authority with killing cats can not to change nothing in this situation only can to make more bad prestige of theirself,of their Port and of their company.
And first need to use only TNR of this cats.
 
I am all for the TNR program. I do, however, understand that this can be difficult financially. With all of the people concerned about these animals, hopefully, raising funds will not much of a problem. I don't see why the airport authorities wouldn't at least give such a program a chance to work.

On the other hand, those fighting for the cats also need to be willing to reevaluate the situation if seagulls continue to be a problem due to the cat food being provided to the feral cat population. Yes, I am inclined to believe that a small amount of cat food is not causing the seagulls to be near the airport, but I think airport authorities should objectively look into the matter. One bird can take down a plane. If flocks of birds are around the airport it can be dangerous for all. If the birds are proven to be a serious concern, not just a method for the airport to justify killing hundreds of cats, there is an option that should be considered by both sides. One idea would be to implement TNR, and ask airport workers to stop feeding the cats. Compromise people, are we not all adults?
 
Pat H.
Pat H. (LuvsDals)
1 month ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
TNR the adults & turn kittens over to rescues! It is the only way to handle this problem.
 
Sue G.
Sue G. (wingett)
1 month ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
TNR is the best possible solution for their problem. They are not going to destroy them all and it's horrible that they would try this. The cats will just multiply again and then they will have to kill again. I just wonder how many rats and mice they would have if it wasn't for the cats.
 
Merissa
Merissa
1 month ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I agree that the cats should not be destroyed. It looks like this is a problem that was ignored and now it has gotten out of hand. The Port Authority's "solution" of extermination is probably because it is more economical. In the long run it probably would not solve anything either.
 
Carly T.
Carly T. (Carly67)
1 month ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Exterminating feral cats should result in criminal action. If someone started killing cats in there yard, they would get a fine and/or jail time. The same should apply here.

Good thing there are many people willing to help these feral cats.
 
We all know that TNR works, but does take time. And if the cats are no problem with causing accidents, then why not try and TNR them. Plus I am sure they care keeping the rodents under control.
 
ourstaff
ourstaff
1 month ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I can see a reduction in the population but only if it is done slowly by a trap and release program. The location sounds like it will always attact feral cats so killing the current population won't help. It may just allow the bird and rodent population to increase. A well managed feral cat program could control all three populations.
 
KELEZ
KELEZ
1 month ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
At least try to save these cats! remeber they didn't ask to be feral, or homeless, or UNWANTED. I'm sure all they want is to be loved!
 
Debbie
Debbie (Shortcircuit)
1 month ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
There has to be a good solution.
 
Brea
Brea (Brea1)
1 month ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
It's awful when feral cats are treated as pests. I don't understand why they'd want to spend money on an exterminator rather than allow the free TNR program to work. Feral cats only have a life expectancy of about 5 years and they'll feed on the mice and rats that the food vendors attract.
 
sheri
sheri (moonstardance)
1 month ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
They should at least try.They should of along time back.That is alot of kittys.
 
Liz
Liz (PurrPurrsMom)
1 month ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
It can't hurt to try.
 
kadiquilts
kadiquilts
1 month ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Why not at least try it? I wish people would stop dumping animals!
 
TNR and if they are kittens and if possible adopt.
 
I agree with TNR. I don't know why the airport doesn't want to even try it.
 
sheila f.
Flag this comment | Good Point | 1 user liked it.
Reply
I am in favor of TNR.....and, I agree with Julie, the airport should be investigating why there are so many cats being "lost"
 
If the feral cat population at this location is descended from lost pets ... as long as pets are "lost" by baggage handlers, the cat population will be fed new cats into its number. Perhaps a longer, harder look at the Swiss cheese holes in handling cats being shipped, should be taken. TNR is great, but the problem appears to originate with the "lost" pets that were actually mishandled by baggage handlers.
 
patty
patty (mikkizmom)
1 month ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Well before they jump the "gun" they should at least give TNR a chance.
 
Cheryl
Cheryl (cherries33)
1 month ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I'm for TNR too. There are a lot of cats but with time the population will go down. In the mean time I'm sure they are taking care of rodents in the area and maybe those seagulls the airport is so concerned about will provide a few meals too.
 
Mary T.
Mary T. (marytorio)
1 month ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 1 user liked it.
Reply
How wonderful to see TNR in a front page news story!! The pres of our rescue just had a letter-to-the-editor in our local paper about the importance of TNR programs. TNR is one of the cornerstones of our rescue.

I hope the local groups can get through to the powers that be so those cats can be TNR'd rather than killed.
 
deedee
deedee
1 month ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
ALOT of thought needs to go into this.............it's a rough call.
 
ilovedogs3772
ilovedogs3772
1 month ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I def think that TNR is the best way to get them under control for now and then maybe start finding them homes away from the city, because I don't think the airport is the best environment for them.
 
Nancy W.
Nancy W. (kc2la)
1 month ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
I hope that the Port Authorit follows through with the humane TNR program. There is no reason to treat the feral cats like a rodent infestation. They aren't harming the property or the people by being there. It makes much more sense to just get the population under control so it stops growing.
 
Dreamwisher
Dreamwisher
1 month ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
My my my I wonder are the cats a security risk? More birds fly into the engine of a plane than a cat. If you don't own it don't know it don't care about it, well then I gusee they decided to kill it. What a pity this world is turning into. Not everyone just those we read about and those we don't.
 
deedee
deedee
1 month ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
"They hired an exterminator".............Huh......
 
donteatlipglozz
donteatlipglozz
1 month ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
The definetly don't need to harm these cats & kittens! The TNR program needs to focus on keeping the population at a stand still. That way the ones who are already born can live out there life, but do not produce anymore. But don't hurt them!
 
Gail A.
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
That is a lot of cats!!!! I agree with the authority.
 
Nelson
Nelson (shadrack)
1 month ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 1 user liked it.
Reply
TNR for 300 to 500 cats... the authority has a point here... I am sure that there is a happy medium somewhere, but I cannot see all 300 - 500 cats being released onto the property. It's another sad example of animals suffering because of irresponsible pet owners.
 
Desiree A.
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
Implementing a TNR program for 500 cats will be a major effort, but it can be done. I care for a feral colony and it is true that once you start a TNR program the numbers in the colony start diminishing rapidly. Some feral cats live for many years, but most only live a few years. They are frequently the victims of accidents, illness and violence. I just had a cat die from an abdominal abcess and she was only three years old.
 
Carly T.
Carly T. (Carly67)
1 month ago
Flag this comment | Good Point | 0 users voted.
Reply
It is alot of cats, but there are probably alot of kittens that could eventually be put up for adoption. Also, feral cats don't live for too many years so after a year or two the population will probably have decreased by about a hundred.