
Big Apple Protesters Fight for Feral Cats at Airport
Browse News
Feral cats at the JFK Airport have stirred a debate between transportation officials and cat lovers. (Pet Pulse Photo by Jose Alvarez, Illustration by Tim Mattston)
July 3, 2008
NEW YORK -- Demonstrators were outside the Port Authority headquarters last week, angry at how authorities were handling the issue of hundreds of feral cats living on the grounds of John F. Kennedy Airport.
The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey manages JFK Airport.
“The Humane Society and other rescue groups are baffled that the Port Authority and JFK suddenly said cats posed a problem, because they have been there for decades,” Patrick Kwan, New York state director of the Humane Society of the United States.
“There has never been an instance of a plane being brought down by a cat in the airport,” Kwan added.
Cats have not posed a significant problem to airplanes at Kennedy or any other airport nationwide, according to the Federal Aviation Administration. Of the 80,000 reported incidents of animals striking planes that have been studied for the past 18 years, less than one percent were cat related.
“In each of the 14 cases that were identified in our database there was no damage to the aircraft or any type of injuries associated to the event,” said Michael Brown, manager of Airport Safety at the FAA.
Of the estimated 300 to 500 cats and kittens living at Kennedy Airport, cat advocates say that no cats have been reported near the runway.
“The cats are the descendents of lost pets that have gone on to spawn a new generation,” said Valerie Sicignano, director of the New York City Feral Cat Initiative.
“For decades, many of the airport employees have been caring for the cats,” Kwan said. “Some have been working on programs to trap, neuter and return.”
Trap, neuter and return, also known as TNR, is considered the most humane approach in dealing with feral cats, unlike the airport’s current strategy of exterminating them altogether.
“They hired an exterminator in May to round up the cats, and a few months ago they promised us a ban on trapping, but they went back on their word,” Sicignano said.
“The humane society is asking for the Port Authority and JFK to work with local humane groups to implement a trap neuter return program,” Kwan said. “It is a proven method and the only recognized humane method for feral cat population control.”
A spokesperson for the Port Authority declined comment, saying any comment they have made in the past has been misinterpreted.
“With all due respect, I think they presented some very disingenuous arguments at the beginning, that it was about security, and that the food for the cats was attracting seagulls,” said Michael Phillips, president of the Urban Cat League.
“There are seagulls at JFK because JFK is on the sea. A few dishes of cat food is not driving seagulls into the carbines of engines.”
The cat advocates’ efforts may finally pay off. Officials at a recent Port Authority public board meeting were heard saying “If they have a pilot program that is not going to cost the Port Authority any money, why don’t we at least try it?”
Tell us what you think about “Big Apple Protesters Fight for Feral Cats at Airport” below. Share your favorite videos by clicking on the ZootooTV tab. Send us your story ideas by e-mailing us at news@zootoo.com or by calling us at 877-777-4204.

Comments
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
In this case, I think it seems odd that after decades of having feral cats, the authorities at JFK would suddenly decide to kill them all instead of first trying a less severe approach.
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
Here are some points to consider:
(1) There are an estimated 300-500 feral cats at JFK airport;
(2) "The cats are descendents of lost pets"; and,
(3) The problem has existed for decades
Knowing what I know about cat reproduction, 300-500 feral cats after DECADES is actually quite SMALL! That would lead me to consider the possibility--or probability--that many of the "lost pets" were already spayed/neutered!!! If this is true, then a TRN initiative on the part of the airline might not be nearly as expensive as originally thought. Granted, at least some of the feral cats are reproducing, but it doesn't sound like they have reproduced at an alarming rate since the 300-500 population (after "decades") is, in perspective, VERY SMALL.
IF the JFK officials at least TRY the TRN option, they may find that it is a viable option that everyone (and every cat) can live with.
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
Also, cats spread disease, many of which are dangerous to young children, babies and pregnant women.
The solution in addition to the TNR is to stop feeding the cats, as that perpetuates the problem. The cats will move elsewhere to find food as they are very resourceful. It isn't like they are going to all die if no one feeds them. They will instead become someone else's problem.
Personally my neighbor irritates me, but we are trying very hard to get the traps from the shelter to trap and then take the cats in to the shelter. Here where I live, there is a long waiting list for the traps, at least 2 months. I have no problem with the TNR as her cats have no collars and obviously are not spayed/neutered.
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
In regards to the amount of cat feces left behind, there are also probably numerous other animals--like opossums and skunks or whatever--who serve as vacuum cleaners! (Besides, most cats "cover up" their own messes!)
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
You would think that more businesses would see that animals lovers protest when problems like this aren't handled humanely, and try to find a solution that makes everyone happy.
1 month ago
Reply
[Why don't the airline passengers who had their cats "go missing" on a flight to/from JFK have a good idea of where to look for their lost cats??]
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
I am surprise.It is the Port Authority first need to ask to use only TNR.
Becouse "To kill' do not work and can not to work.It is without sense,without mind,not clever and unhuman and cruel.
On this place will come another new cats,population will be grow and again this story will be repeat and repeat and repeat .But people which agree to kill cats or kill them only will lose theirself souls.
Only need to use TNR.
Fix cats will be protect their territory of the Port and no problem.
Number of the fix cats become quickly small becouse no kittens but poor cats outside do not live long time.This quistion would be close forever.
And the Port authority and all people around only will win if to use TNR.
1 month ago
Reply
But the Port Authority need to remind that they are too people and need to be more human with the lifes of the another alive around them.
THe Port Authority need to help that to sterilisate feral cats.
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
Now that there are major Cat numbers,it's out of hand,so to speak.
It's not right to kill off cats just because they were placed in these situations,as they didn't have much say.
Okay,so there are a lot of cats,TNR is still the right thing to do to even begin to change the problem.You can kill them all off,but that only opens the doors for new animals to move in.
Someone wasn't being responsible pet owners and now countless cats are struggling to survive.They need our help,not a death sentence.It also comes up to make "dumping animals" a huge fine,adopting only spayed/neutered pets,etc.
We the people created this outrage,so it's up to us to help them.
Every time I turn around,I'm always hearing about so many stupid issues that our tax dollars are paying for.Let's get our priorities right,and start taking matters more seriously.There are free and low cost clinics all over.The Port Authority takes in tons of money and wastes tons.They should step up along with the City council and help come up with some funding.
This problem isn't going to disappear overnight.It was left to get completely out of control and now someone has to pay the consequences.Hopefully,it's not the poor defenseless cats.
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
The Port Authority with killing cats can not to change nothing in this situation only can to make more bad prestige of theirself,of their Port and of their company.
And first need to use only TNR of this cats.
1 month ago
Reply
On the other hand, those fighting for the cats also need to be willing to reevaluate the situation if seagulls continue to be a problem due to the cat food being provided to the feral cat population. Yes, I am inclined to believe that a small amount of cat food is not causing the seagulls to be near the airport, but I think airport authorities should objectively look into the matter. One bird can take down a plane. If flocks of birds are around the airport it can be dangerous for all. If the birds are proven to be a serious concern, not just a method for the airport to justify killing hundreds of cats, there is an option that should be considered by both sides. One idea would be to implement TNR, and ask airport workers to stop feeding the cats. Compromise people, are we not all adults?
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
Good thing there are many people willing to help these feral cats.
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
I hope the local groups can get through to the powers that be so those cats can be TNR'd rather than killed.
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply
1 month ago
Reply